Search: condonation of delay

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 164clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 12A9 Section 118 Addition to Income7 Section 153C6 Section 143(3)5 Section 54 Condonation of Delay4 Section 143(1)3 Section 12

DIPIKA AQUA FARM,OLPAD vs. ADDL JCIT (A)-11, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 948/SRT/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat03 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: Shri Bhavesh Saraiya, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Jain, Sr. DR

Section 143(1)Section 5

164/- instead of net business income claimed by the assessee at Rs. 98,595/-. Hence, CPC made addition by disallowing expense of Rs. 9,56,569/-. 4. In appeal, Ld. CIT(A) observed that there an inordinate delay of 3018 days i.e. more than eight years’ delay in filing of appeal before CIT(A). Before Ld. CIT(A) the assessee

KESHRI EXPORT,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(3)(3), SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

DIPIKA AQUA FARM,OLPAD vs. ADDL JCIT (A)-11, MUMBAI

KESHRI EXPORT,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(3)(3), SURAT

DIPIKA AQUA FARM,OLPAD vs. ADDL JCIT (A)-11, MUMBAI

KESHRI EXPORT,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(3)(3), SURAT

VIJAYBHAI MALABHAI BHARWAD,SURAT vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR.,-1(2), SURAT

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR.,2, SURAT vs. VIJAYBHAI MALABHAI BHARWAD, SURAT

JAYSHRI GOPALLAL MAHARAJSHRINI SURAT SRUSTI TRUST,SURAT vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

SHREE SUIGAM KHODADHOR PANJARA POLE,SURAT vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

VRUNDAVAN RESTAURANT,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(2)(1) (NEW) WARD-1(2)(5), VADODARA (OLD), SURAT

NA vs. ARI MALESAR BEHDIN ANJUMAN,NAVSARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT