BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

206 results for “condonation of delay”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai675Delhi508Chennai487Pune396Ahmedabad393Jaipur338Kolkata292Hyderabad254Bangalore231Surat206Indore171Chandigarh170Raipur145Rajkot133Nagpur132Lucknow128Cochin125Visakhapatnam105Cuttack95Amritsar74Patna72Agra57Guwahati40Ranchi30Panaji26Dehradun24Jabalpur23Jodhpur19Allahabad15Varanasi5

Key Topics

Penalty86Section 271(1)(b)83Addition to Income75Section 143(3)59Section 271(1)(c)49Section 142(1)48Section 14846Section 14445Section 14741

AIRLINK COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS-1), SURAT, SURAT

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 66/SRT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.53 To 57/Srt/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Physical Court Hearing) Airlink Communication Pvt. Ltd. Asst./Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, Tds, Aaykar Bhavan, 1-2, Annapurna Shopping Centre, Vs. Surat-395001 1St Floor Aadajan Patia, Surat- 395009 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaufr 6898 R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

Section 200A

penalty under section 200A of the Income Tax Act and when the assessee carried the matter in appeal before ld CIT(A), the Ld. CIT(A) has not condoned the delay

AIRLINK COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED,SURAT vs. ASST./ DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE TDS, , SURAT

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 56/SRT/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat

Showing 1–20 of 206 · Page 1 of 11

...
Section 25036
Condonation of Delay31
Limitation/Time-bar24
21 Apr 2023
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.53 To 57/Srt/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Physical Court Hearing) Airlink Communication Pvt. Ltd. Asst./Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, Tds, Aaykar Bhavan, 1-2, Annapurna Shopping Centre, Vs. Surat-395001 1St Floor Aadajan Patia, Surat- 395009 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaufr 6898 R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

Section 200A

penalty under section 200A of the Income Tax Act and when the assessee carried the matter in appeal before ld CIT(A), the Ld. CIT(A) has not condoned the delay

AIRLINK COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED,SURAT vs. ASST./ DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE TDS, , SURAT

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 53/SRT/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.53 To 57/Srt/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Physical Court Hearing) Airlink Communication Pvt. Ltd. Asst./Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, Tds, Aaykar Bhavan, 1-2, Annapurna Shopping Centre, Vs. Surat-395001 1St Floor Aadajan Patia, Surat- 395009 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaufr 6898 R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

Section 200A

penalty under section 200A of the Income Tax Act and when the assessee carried the matter in appeal before ld CIT(A), the Ld. CIT(A) has not condoned the delay

AIRLINK COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED,SURAT vs. ASST./ DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE TDS, , SURAT

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 55/SRT/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.53 To 57/Srt/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Physical Court Hearing) Airlink Communication Pvt. Ltd. Asst./Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, Tds, Aaykar Bhavan, 1-2, Annapurna Shopping Centre, Vs. Surat-395001 1St Floor Aadajan Patia, Surat- 395009 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaufr 6898 R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

Section 200A

penalty under section 200A of the Income Tax Act and when the assessee carried the matter in appeal before ld CIT(A), the Ld. CIT(A) has not condoned the delay

AIRLINK COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED,SURAT vs. ASST./ DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE TDS, , SURAT

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 57/SRT/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.53 To 57/Srt/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Physical Court Hearing) Airlink Communication Pvt. Ltd. Asst./Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, Tds, Aaykar Bhavan, 1-2, Annapurna Shopping Centre, Vs. Surat-395001 1St Floor Aadajan Patia, Surat- 395009 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaufr 6898 R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

Section 200A

penalty under section 200A of the Income Tax Act and when the assessee carried the matter in appeal before ld CIT(A), the Ld. CIT(A) has not condoned the delay

AIRLINK COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED,SURAT vs. ASST./ DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE TDS, , SURAT

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 54/SRT/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.53 To 57/Srt/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Physical Court Hearing) Airlink Communication Pvt. Ltd. Asst./Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, Tds, Aaykar Bhavan, 1-2, Annapurna Shopping Centre, Vs. Surat-395001 1St Floor Aadajan Patia, Surat- 395009 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaufr 6898 R (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

Section 200A

penalty under section 200A of the Income Tax Act and when the assessee carried the matter in appeal before ld CIT(A), the Ld. CIT(A) has not condoned the delay

BASANT SEKHANI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 585/SRT/2023[2010-11]Status: HeardITAT Surat01 Nov 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 144Section 254(1)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 69

condoned the delay, resultantly the appeal was not admitted and dismissed in limine. Similarly, there was a delay in filing appeal in penalty

BASANT SEKHANI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 584/SRT/2023[2010-11]Status: HeardITAT Surat01 Nov 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 144Section 254(1)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 69

condoned the delay, resultantly the appeal was not admitted and dismissed in limine. Similarly, there was a delay in filing appeal in penalty

BHARATBHAI NAGINBHAI PATEL,ANKLESHWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(4), BHARUCH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 393/SRT/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Dr. A. L. Sainiआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.393/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Physical Hearing) Bharatbhai Nagjibhai Patel, Vs. The Ito, 392, Nishal Faliu, Nava Haripura, Ward- 2(4), Sajod, Ankleshwar, Bharuch, Bharuch, Gujarat – 393020. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bpppp4227M (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Ashutosh P. Nanavaty, Ca Appellant By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Respondent By Date Of Hearing 16/10/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 30/10/2023

Section 143(3)Section 249(3)

Condonation of Delay and such miscellaneous application and affidavit is being filed before Hon'ble Surat for the first time. 5.It is also submitted that appellant being agriculturist having no other economic activity or business and residing at village has added to the fact of lack of experience as to functioning of income-tax proceedings and also fact that such

KIRTI KARSANDAS NAYAK,UMBERGAON vs. ITO WARD-5, VAPI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for peal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 659/SRT/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Oct 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Assessment Year: 2011-2012 Kirti Karsandas Nayak, Ito Ward-5, Plot No. 244/28, Gidc, Fortune Square, Chala Road, Umbergaon-396171. Vs. Vapi-396191. Pan No. Abbpn 3355 M Appellant Respondent

For Respondent: Mr. Parin Shah, CA
Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

penalty u/s u/s u/s 271(1)(c) 271(1)(c) 271(1)(c) of of of the the the Act is is unjustified. 2. At the very threshold, the learned Counsel for the assessee At the very threshold, the learned Counsel for the assessee At the very threshold, the learned Counsel for the assessee drew our attention to the delay

MUKHTAR RAMZAN SHAIKH,VAPI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6, VAPI, VAPI

In the result, assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 628/SRT/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat12 Dec 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Dr. A. L. Sainiआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.628 & 629/Srt/2023 Assessment Years: (2010-11 & 2011-12) (Physical Hearing) Mukhtar Ramzan Shaikh Income Tax Officer, 303, Imran Mension, Opp. Vs. Ward-6, Vapi, Income Tax Office, Suman Auto, Godal Nagar, Room No.808, Fortune Saquare- Vapi-396191 Ii, Daman Road, Chala Vapi- 396191 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Awlps 0991 F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

Section 139Section 143(3)Section 148Section 69ASection 80C

penalty etc., on my shoulders. This affidavit is prepared to file in the office of the Hon’ble ITAT, Surat Bench, Surat in the matter of condonation of delay

MUKHTAR RAMZAN SHAIKH,VAPI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6, VAPI, VAPI

In the result, assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 629/SRT/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat12 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Dr. A. L. Sainiआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.628 & 629/Srt/2023 Assessment Years: (2010-11 & 2011-12) (Physical Hearing) Mukhtar Ramzan Shaikh Income Tax Officer, 303, Imran Mension, Opp. Vs. Ward-6, Vapi, Income Tax Office, Suman Auto, Godal Nagar, Room No.808, Fortune Saquare- Vapi-396191 Ii, Daman Road, Chala Vapi- 396191 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Awlps 0991 F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

Section 139Section 143(3)Section 148Section 69ASection 80C

penalty etc., on my shoulders. This affidavit is prepared to file in the office of the Hon’ble ITAT, Surat Bench, Surat in the matter of condonation of delay

RAMESHCHANDRA BUDHIYABHAI AHIR,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, BARDOLI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 621/SRT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Oct 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Dr. A. L. Sainiआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.621/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Physical Hearing) Rameshchandra Budhiyabhai Ahir, Income Tax Officer, Vs. Pilutha Faliyu, At & Post – Ward-1, Bardoli, Income Tax Office, 2Nd Floor, Siyalaj, Tal – Magrol, Dist – Surat, Surat – 394110 Bsnl Building, Station Road, Bardoli-394601 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Alfpa7625Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 144Section 51

Penalty etc. on my shoulders. 6. Honorable Apex Court in the case of Commissioner land Acquisition Ms Katiji 167 ITR 471 SC has held as “The Legislature has conferred the power to condone delay

RAGHUNANDAN IMPEX PVT LTD,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WD-2(1)(1), SURAT, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 641/SRT/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Oct 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Assessment Year: 2012-2013 Raghunandan Impex Pvt. Ltd., Ito Ward 2(1)(1), 6/2037, Office No. 205, 2Nd Floor, Room No. 222, Papadwala Building, Bhoja Bhai Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Ni Sheri, Mahidharpura, Majura Gate, Surat-395003. Surat-395001. Pan No. Aaecr 5688 Q Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Prakash Jhunjhunwala, CAFor Respondent: Mr. J.K. Chandnani, Sr. DR
Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 68

penalty has been passed. Accordingly, I immediately appointed M/s. Prakash Jhunjhunwala & immediately appointed M/s. Prakash Jhunjhunwala & immediately appointed M/s. Prakash Jhunjhunwala & Co. LLP, Chartered Accountant and filed the 2 ^ (nd) appeal with a LLP, Chartered Accountant and filed the 2 ^ (nd) appeal with a LLP, Chartered Accountant and filed the 2 ^ (nd) appeal with a prayer for condonation of delay

GAHNSHYAM K KEVADIYA HUF,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1(3)(6), SURAT

In the result, the ground of appeal raised in this\nappeal is allowed

ITA 1030/SRT/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat22 Jan 2025AY 2010-11
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 254(1)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty. There was a delay in filing the appeals before the Tribunal, attributed to the migration to a faceless regime and oversight by the previous consultant. The assessee claimed the delay was not intentional.", "held": "The Tribunal condoned

SHRI ANURAGRAIJI V. GOSWAMI,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(1),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed

ITA 1331/AHD/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Feb 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.1331/Ahd/2015 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2006-07 Anuragraji V. Goswami, Vs. Income Tax Officer, C/O. Yogesh B. Shah, Ward-5(1), Surat. 5/458, Haripura, Kaljug Street, Surat-395003 [Pan: Aajpt 4629 F] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""थ"/Respondent

delay is condoned. Ground no. 1,2 & 3 relates to sustaining of Rs.3,05,200/- and 5. Rs.1,15,390 being income in the hands of the appellant. Though the gift of Rs.3,05,200/- gift worth of Rs.3,00,000/- is received through cheque from Anuragraji V. Goswami v. ITO, Ward-5(1),Surat/ITA. 1331/AHD/2017/A.Y.2006-07 Page

SAROJ TILAKRAJ JUNEJA,SURAT vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1(1)(1), SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 1048/SRT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1048/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2014-15) (Physical Hearing) Saroj Tilakraj Juneja, Vs. The Dcit, 3, Subhas Nagar Society, Ghod Dod Road, Circle - 1(1)(1), Surat - 395007 Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Abbpj5634M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Kiran K. Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Mukesh Jain, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 08/01/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 13/01/2025

Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 253(3)Section 253(5)Section 69

condonation of delay which is extracted at para 2 of the appellate order. In the said application, the assessee submitted that the order of AO was not issued on mail of AR and it was simply uploaded on portal. The assessee came to know about the order only when penalty

THAKORBHAI CHHAGANBHAI MORI,BHARUCH vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), BHARUCH

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 405/SRT/2025[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Surat09 Oct 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Om Prakash Kant

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 253Section 271(1)(c)Section 5

condonation of delay has been filed by the assessee, wherein it has been mentioned as under: 2 Thakorbhai Chhaganbhai Mori. 1. The Ld. A.O. has passed the assessment order u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act before the Ld. CIT(A) on 20.12.2019. The Ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal dated 29.11.2019, for A.Y.2012-13 against which the appellant

I K CORPORATION ,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1(3)(2), SURAT

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 789/SRT/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat11 Jul 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.789 & 790/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2009-10) (Hybrid Hearing) I K. Corporation Income Tax Officer, बनाम/ E-407, Krishna Township, Ward -1(3)(2), Surat, Room No.203, Vs. Nr. Govindji Hall, Dabholi 2Nd Floor, Aaykar Bhavan, Anavil Road, Katargam, Surat-395 Business Center, Adajan Road, Surat- 004 395 009 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aacfi 2599 E (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 253(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 69Section 69A

condone the delay in filing appeal. The Ld. AR submitted that the delay in filing appeal before CIT(A) was neither deliberate nor intentional and it was due to circumstances beyond the control of the surviving partner, Ms. Ina Desai. Hence, he requested that the order of CIT(A) may be set aside in the interest of justice

I K CORPORATION,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(3)(2), SURAT

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 790/SRT/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat11 Jul 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Ms Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.789 & 790/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2009-10) (Hybrid Hearing) I K. Corporation Income Tax Officer, बनाम/ E-407, Krishna Township, Ward -1(3)(2), Surat, Room No.203, Vs. Nr. Govindji Hall, Dabholi 2Nd Floor, Aaykar Bhavan, Anavil Road, Katargam, Surat-395 Business Center, Adajan Road, Surat- 004 395 009 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aacfi 2599 E (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 253(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 69Section 69A

condone the delay in filing appeal. The Ld. AR submitted that the delay in filing appeal before CIT(A) was neither deliberate nor intentional and it was due to circumstances beyond the control of the surviving partner, Ms. Ina Desai. Hence, he requested that the order of CIT(A) may be set aside in the interest of justice