Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Deemed Dividendclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 2(22)(e)3 Section 143(3)2 Section 14A2 Deemed Dividend2 Addition to Income2 Condonation of Delay2

SHRI MURLI FATANDAS SAWLANI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(3), SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 215/SRT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat17 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.215/Srt/2022 Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Virtual Hearing) Shri Murli Fatandas Sawlani, Vs. The Ito, Ward – 1(3)(3), C/O. Ketan H. Shah, Advocate, Surat. 9Th Floor, Sopphire Ciomplex, C.G. Road, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad – 380009. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Adeps9862M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Ketan Shah, Ar & Shri Aman K. Shah, Ar Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 25/04/2023 17/05/2023 Date Of Pronouncement

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263

condonation of delay, which is reproduced below: “I, Murli Son of Fatandas Sawlani age about 63 years, residing at Sawlani Estate, Surat do hereby solemnly affirm as under: 1. That, I have filed my return of income for the AY 2013-14 on 23-11-2013 and thereafter, there was 143(3) assessments made making addition in reference to ITA.215/SRT/2022/AY.2013-14

SHRI MURLI FATANDAS SAWLANI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(3), SURAT

SHRI MURLI FATANDAS SAWLANI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(3), SURAT

MURUGAN MUTTAIAH MADASAMY,,HYDERABAD vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, SURAT