BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Unexplained Cash Creditclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi157Mumbai66Chennai63Jaipur34Ahmedabad20Chandigarh18Bangalore16Pune16Cochin12Hyderabad11Allahabad10Lucknow9Amritsar8Indore8Kolkata7Agra6Nagpur4Cuttack3Raipur3Surat3Varanasi2Rajkot1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 12A4Section 244Section 254(1)3Section 133(6)3Exemption3Addition to Income3Section 112Section 69A2Section 115B2Section 144

SHRI RAM EDUCATION & GRAMINVIKAS CHARITABLE TRUST,VALSAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTION WARD), SURAT

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 213/SRT/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Sainishri Ram Education & I.T.O., (Exemption Ward) Graminvikas Charitable Trust, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Jauagauri Park, Hathikhana, Majura Gate, Dharampur, Surat. Valsad-396050. Pan No. Aalts 324 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 10(23)(C)Section 11aSection 12ASection 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 254(1)

Charitable Trust Vs ITO creditor, accordingly, made addition of Rs. 17,61,257/- as unexplained credit. 6. The Assessing Officer also noted that the assessee has shown total expenses of Rs. 1,40,21,342/- and most of the expenses were incurred in cash

2
Charitable Trust2
Disallowance2

AMALSAD VIBHAG KELVANI MANDAL,AMALSAD, NA vs. ARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, , SURAT

In the result, this ground of appeal is allowed

ITA 213/SRT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 Oct 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) Amalsad Vibhag Kelvani Mandal, I.T.O., C/O-H.D.S.M. High School, Exemption Ward, Vs. Amalsad, Room No. 105, Anavil Dist.-Navsari-396310. Business Centre, Adajan Pan No. Aaata 3923 C Hazira Road, Adajan, Surat. Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 11Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 24Section 254(1)

unexplained cash credit, arbitrarily ignoring the detailed audited statements of educational branch of the trust from the separate books of accounts furnished through various written submissions, being without jurisdiction, bad in law, illegal, perverse, arbitrary conjectural, capricious and hence, deserves to be deleted. 4. Your appellant further reserves its right to add, alter, amend or modify any of the aforesaid

MADRESA HIMAYATUL ISLAM BACHCHON KA GHAR,BARDOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 279/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Surat02 Jan 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) Madresa Himayatul Islam Bachchon Ka I.T.O. Ghar, Exemption Ward, Vs. Ground Floor Bachchon Ka Ghar, Surat. Kadod, Bardoli-394335. Pan No. Aadtm 1802 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 115BSection 12ASection 133(6)Section 144Section 249Section 249(4)Section 254(1)Section 69A

unexplained cash credits made in the bank. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned assessing Officer has erred in taxing the addition by taking the rate @ 77.25% by attracting S. 115BBE instead of normal tax rate. Madresa Himayatul Islam Vs ITO(E) 5. On the facts and circumstances