SHREE SUIGAM KHODADHOR PANJARA POLE,SURAT vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

charitable trust registered under section 12A, had substantially satisfied condition for availing benefit of exemption as a trust, it could not be denied exemption merely on bar of limitation in furnishing audit report in Form no. 10B. 7.5 In the case of CIT v. Gujarat Oil & Allied Industries [1993] 201 ITR 325 (Guj.), the High Court held that where

GANGADHARA SAHKARI KELVANI MANDAL,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

charitable trust with main object of Education. So we request your honour to consider the fact of registration and other fact of the case and to grant registration of the Sec 80(G) of the Income Tax Act- 1961." 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee trust applied for grant of registration

LOK BHARTI MANDAL,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) WARD, SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed in above terms

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.212/Srt/2023 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2008-09) (Physical Hearing) Lok Bharati Mandal, Vs. The Ito, Bharatia Vidhya Sankul, Opp. Terapanthi (Exemption) Ward, Bhavan, City Light Ropad, Surat. Surat – 395007. (Assessee) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatl2524Q Assessee By Shri Hiren Vepari, Ca Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr 04/05/2023 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 16/06/2023

trust is kept in deposit account and income earned therefrom is utilized for charitable purposes, assessee is entitled to benefit of exemption under section 11(1)(d) in respect of said income. Based on these facts and circumstances, we allow ground No.1 raised by the assessee. 15. In the result, ground No.1 raised by the assessee is allowed. 16. Coming

ST. JOHN AMBULANCE ASSOCIALTION,SURAT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, grounds of assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) St. John Ambulance Commissioner Of Income Tax Association, (Exemptions), Ahmedabad, Vs. 101, ‘Shriji Niwas’ A To Z Room No. 609, Floor-6, Bldge, Mansukh Tower Lane, Aayakar Bhawan (Vejalpur), Opp. Dhiraj Sons, Athwagate, Nr. Sachin Tower, 100 Foot Surat-395001. Road, Anandnagar- Pan: Aadts 1360 C Prahladnagar Road, Ahmedabad-380015. Appellant Respondednt

Trust under Section 80G(5) of the Act in Form 10AB in accordance with Rule 11AA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, (in short, the Rules) on 12.08.2022. The assessee furnished required details at the time of filing application electronically/online. On receipt of such application, the ld. CIT(E) issued specific notice dated 17/02/2023 contending therein that

GREEN MUMBAY LIONS EDUCATION TRUST,NA vs. ARIVS.EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT, INCOME-TAX OFFICE SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.547/Srt/2025 Assessment Year: (2023-24) (Hybrid Hearing) Green Mumbay Lions Education Vs. Ito, Trust, Exemption Ward, Opp – Ratnakar Society, C/O Sgm Surat Shiroya English School, Chhapra Road, Navsari - 396445 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aatg8361Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) Appellant By Shri Bhupendra Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 12/11/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 23/12/2025

80,700/-. The CPC, Bangalore (in short, ‘AO - CPC’) had issued an prima facie adjustment communication to the assessee on 29.11.2024, stating that there was inconsistency in ‘deemed income’ referred in Explanation - 4 to the third proviso to section 10(23C) or section 11(3) at Sr. No.1 of Schedule 115BBI and Sr. No. 33(b) of Form No.10B

SHREE SAINATH SARVAJANIK SEWA MANDAL TRUST,UNA vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.204/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2016-17) (Physical Court Hearing) Shree Sainath Sarvajanik Sewa Vs. The Ito, Exemption Ward, Mandal Trust, Surat. N.H. No.8, Near Ganesh Sisodra, Unn-396445, Gujarat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aafts7802P (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca Revenue By: Shri J. K. Chandnani, Sr. Dr सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 12/05/2022 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 22/07/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A. L. Saini: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2016-17, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), [In Short ‘Ld. Cit(A)’] National Faceless Appeal Centre (In Short ‘Nfac), Delhi, In Appeal No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2021-22/1036051308(1) Dated 30.09.2021, Which In Turn Arises Out Of A Penalty Order Passed By Assessing Officer U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

charitable trust and registered u/s 12A of the IT Act. The assessee filed its return of income for A.Y.2016-17 on 21.09.2016 declaring total income at Rs. Nil and thereby claiming refund of Rs.7,20,730/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was finalized u/s 143(3) by making addition of Rs.20,63,925/- on account of disallowance