SHARDABEN ARJANBHAI DHOLAKIYA WELFARE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Ms Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1306 To 1308/Srt/2024 (Physical Hearing) Shardaben Arjanbhai Dholakiya Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Welfare Trust, Ahmedabad B-8, Vallabhnagar Society, Opp – Baroda Pristage Varachha Road, Surat - 395006 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abdts8099R (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Ashish Pophare, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 06/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/04/2025

56 days in terms of provisions of section 253(3) of the Act. The assessee ITA Nos.1306 to1308/SRT/2024 Shardaben Arjanbhai Dholakiya has filed an affidavit for delay in filing of appeal before the Tribunal. In the affidavit, it has been stated that the CIT(E) rejected approval u/s 80G(5) on the ground that application for registration

SHARDABEN ARJANBHAI DHOLAKIYA WELFARE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Ms Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1306 To 1308/Srt/2024 (Physical Hearing) Shardaben Arjanbhai Dholakiya Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Welfare Trust, Ahmedabad B-8, Vallabhnagar Society, Opp – Baroda Pristage Varachha Road, Surat - 395006 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abdts8099R (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Ashish Pophare, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 06/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/04/2025

56 days in terms of provisions of section 253(3) of the Act. The assessee ITA Nos.1306 to1308/SRT/2024 Shardaben Arjanbhai Dholakiya has filed an affidavit for delay in filing of appeal before the Tribunal. In the affidavit, it has been stated that the CIT(E) rejected approval u/s 80G(5) on the ground that application for registration

THE SORABJEE NUSSERWANJEE PARUCK PARSI POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE,SURAT vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

56 each in filing\nappeals of the other 4 cases. The appellant-trusts have filed similar affidavit\nand condonation applications, as in the case of Bai Pirojbai Manekji Patel (ITA\nNo.487/SRT/2025). The delays in filing appeals are condoned for the reasons\ngiven in the above case (supra).\n5.\nBefore deciding the lead case, the following primary facts may be stated

SAHAKARI KHAND UDUOG MANDAL LTD.,NA vs. ARIVS.DCIT, NAVSARI CIRCLE, NAVSARI, NAVSARI

In the result, all the appeals are disposed of in the manner indicated\nhereinbefore

charitable trust.\n(vi) That the appellant could not prove that a higher price was paid by\nit to the farmers on account of higher yield or some other factors.\nBesides nowhere it has been claimed that at the time of supply of\nsugarcane by the farmers to the appellant, any agreement or contract\nfor payment of price higher than

ACIT, NA vs. ARI CIRCLE, NAVSARIVS.M/S. MAROLI VIBHAG, KAND UDYOG SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD., NAVSARI

In the result, all the appeals are disposed of in the manner indicated\nhereinbefore

charitable trust.\n(vi) That the appellant could not prove that a higher price was paid by\nit to the farmers on account of higher yield or some other factors.\nBesides nowhere it has been claimed that at the time of supply of\nsugarcane by the farmers to the appellant, any agreement or contract\nfor payment of price higher than

ACIT, NA vs. ARI CIRCLE., NAVSARIVS.M/S. MAROLI VIBHAG KHAND UDYOG SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD,, NAVASARI

charitable trust.\n(vi) That the appellant could not prove that a higher price was paid by\nit to the farmers on account of higher yield or some other factors.\nBesides nowhere it has been claimed that at the time of supply of\nsugarcane by the farmers to the appellant, any agreement or contract\nfor payment of price higher than

ACIT, NA vs. ARI CIRCLE, NAVSARIVS.M/S. MAROLI VIBHAG KHAND UDYOG SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD.,, NAVSARI

In the result, all the appeals are disposed of in the manner indicated\nhereinbefore

charitable trust.\n(vi) That the appellant could not prove that a higher price was paid by\nit to the farmers on account of higher yield or some other factors.\nBesides nowhere it has been claimed that at the time of supply of\nsugarcane by the farmers to the appellant, any agreement or contract\nfor payment of price higher than

SAHADARI KHAND UDYOG MANDAL LTD.,,NA vs. ARIVS.ACIT, NAVSARI CIRCLE, NAVSARI, NAVSARI

charitable trust.\n(vi) That the appellant could not prove that a higher price was paid by\nit to the farmers on account of higher yield or some other factors.\nBesides nowhere it has been claimed that at the time of supply of\nsugarcane by the farmers to the appellant, any agreement or contract\nfor payment of price higher than

MAROLI VIBHAG KHAND UDYOG SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD,.,NA vs. ARIVS.ACIT, NAVSARI CIRCLE, , NAVSARI

charitable trust.\n(vi) That the appellant could not prove that a higher price was paid by\nit to the farmers on account of higher yield or some other factors.\nBesides nowhere it has been claimed that at the time of supply of\nsugarcane by the farmers to the appellant, any agreement or contract\nfor payment of price higher than

SHREE KHEDUT SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD.,BARDOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARDOLI

In the result, all the appeals are disposed of in the manner indicated\nhereinbefore

charitable trust.\n(vi) That the appellant could not prove that a higher price was paid by\nit to the farmers on account of higher yield or some other factors.\nBesides nowhere it has been claimed that at the time of supply of\nsugarcane by the farmers to the appellant, any agreement or contract\n25\nfor payment of price higher

SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDAL LTD.,,GANDEVI vs. ACIT, NAVSARI CIRCLE, NAVSARI, NAVSARI

charitable trust.\n(vi) That the appellant could not prove that a higher price was paid by\nit to the farmers on account of higher yield or some other factors.\nBesides nowhere it has been claimed that at the time of supply of\nsugarcane by the farmers to the appellant, any agreement or contract\nfor payment of price higher than

FIRST DASTUR MAHERJI RANA TRUST FUND,SURAT vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

56 each in filing\nappeals of the other 4 cases. The appellant-trusts have filed similar affidavit\n6\nand condonation applications, as in the case of Bai Pirojbai Manekji Patel (ITA\nNo.487/SRT/2025). The delays in filing appeals are condoned for the reasons\ngiven in the above case (supra).\n5.\nBefore deciding the lead case, the following primary facts

THE DASTUR DARAB PAHALANA TRUST FUNDS,SURAT vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION),AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

56 each in filing\nappeals of the other 4 cases. The appellant-trusts have filed similar affidavit\nand condonation applications, as in the case of Bai Pirojbai Manekji Patel (ITA\nNo.487/SRT/2025). The delays in filing appeals are condoned for the reasons\ngiven in the above case (supra).\n5.\nBefore deciding the lead case, the following primary facts may be stated

BAI PIROJBAI MANEKJI PATEL SINGAPOREWALLA ENGLISH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS,SURAT vs. THE CIT (EXEMPTION),AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

56 each in filing\nappeals of the other 4 cases. The appellant-trusts have filed similar affidavit\nand condonation applications, as in the case of Bai Pirojbai Manekji Patel (ITA\nNo.487/SRT/2025). The delays in filing appeals are condoned for the reasons\ngiven in the above case (supra).\n5.\nBefore deciding the lead case, the following primary facts may be stated

THE SORABJI BURJORJI DASTUR DARAB PAAHALANA TRUST FUND,SURAT vs. THE CIT(EXEMPTION),AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, these 4 appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

56 each in filing\nappeals of the other 4 cases. The appellant-trusts have filed similar affidavit\nand condonation applications, as in the case of Bai Pirojbai Manekji Patel (ITA\nNo.487/SRT/2025). The delays in filing appeals are condoned for the reasons\ngiven in the above case (supra).\n5.\nBefore deciding the lead case, the following primary facts may be stated