SHARDABEN ARJANBHAI DHOLAKIYA WELFARE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Ms Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1306 To 1308/Srt/2024 (Physical Hearing) Shardaben Arjanbhai Dholakiya Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Welfare Trust, Ahmedabad B-8, Vallabhnagar Society, Opp – Baroda Pristage Varachha Road, Surat - 395006 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abdts8099R (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Ashish Pophare, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 06/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/04/2025

56 days in terms of provisions of section 253(3) of the Act. The assessee ITA Nos.1306 to1308/SRT/2024 Shardaben Arjanbhai Dholakiya has filed an affidavit for delay in filing of appeal before the Tribunal. In the affidavit, it has been stated that the CIT(E) rejected approval u/s 80G(5) on the ground that application for registration

SHARDABEN ARJANBHAI DHOLAKIYA WELFARE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Ms Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1306 To 1308/Srt/2024 (Physical Hearing) Shardaben Arjanbhai Dholakiya Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Welfare Trust, Ahmedabad B-8, Vallabhnagar Society, Opp – Baroda Pristage Varachha Road, Surat - 395006 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abdts8099R (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Ashish Pophare, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 06/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/04/2025

56 days in terms of provisions of section 253(3) of the Act. The assessee ITA Nos.1306 to1308/SRT/2024 Shardaben Arjanbhai Dholakiya has filed an affidavit for delay in filing of appeal before the Tribunal. In the affidavit, it has been stated that the CIT(E) rejected approval u/s 80G(5) on the ground that application for registration

SHARDABEN ARJANBHAI DHOLAKIYA WELFARE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Ms Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1306 To 1308/Srt/2024 (Physical Hearing) Shardaben Arjanbhai Dholakiya Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Welfare Trust, Ahmedabad B-8, Vallabhnagar Society, Opp – Baroda Pristage Varachha Road, Surat - 395006 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abdts8099R (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Ashish Pophare, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 06/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/04/2025

56 days in terms of provisions of section 253(3) of the Act. The assessee ITA Nos.1306 to1308/SRT/2024 Shardaben Arjanbhai Dholakiya has filed an affidavit for delay in filing of appeal before the Tribunal. In the affidavit, it has been stated that the CIT(E) rejected approval u/s 80G(5) on the ground that application for registration

SHREE KHEDUT SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD.,BARDOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARDOLI

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijyananda Pruseth

charitable trust. (vi) That the appellant could not prove that a higher price was paid by it to the farmers on account of higher yield or some other factors. Besides nowhere it has been claimed that at the time of supply of sugarcane by the farmers to the appellant, any agreement or contract 25 for payment of price higher than