JAYSHRI GOPALLAL MAHARAJSHRINI SURAT SRUSTI TRUST,SURAT vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

1,09, 651/-. The assessee is a charitable trust registered under section 12A of the Act. An intimation was issued by the CPC under section 143

NAVBHARAT CHERITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BHARUCH

In the result, all these three appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi Jhagadia, Bharuch, Ward-1, Vs. Gujarat, Pin-393115 Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

143(2) and section 142(1) respectively of the Act 1961.” 7. Considering the aforesaid factual and legal discussion, I find that the assessee has substantially satisfied all the conditions for availing the benefit of exemption under Section 11/12 of the Act and except for filing audit report in Form 10B, which was filed belatedly, thus respectfully following the decision

S M K R VASHI HIGH SCHOOL,NA vs. ARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.515/Srt/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2021-22) (Physical Court Hearing) S.M.K.R Vashi High School Income Tax Officer-Exemption Ward, Surat, Aaykar Bhavan, Umbhrat Road Maroli Bazar, Vs. Majura Gate, Surat-395001 Jalalpore Navsari-396436 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aalfs 0980 J (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

Charitable Trust (supra) the assessee had produced the audit report after processing the return under section 143(1). This Court

SHREE SUIGAM KHODADHOR PANJARA POLE,SURAT vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

charitable trust registered under section 12A, had substantially satisfied condition for availing benefit of exemption as a trust, it could not be denied exemption merely on bar of limitation in furnishing audit report in Form no. 10B. 11. In the case of Vardhman Stanakvasi Jain Shravak Trust vs. Income-tax Officer [2025] 172 taxmann.com 165 (Ahmedabad - Trib

NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 383, 384 & 385/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi, Jhagadia, Ward-1, Vs. Bharuch. Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

charitable trust registered under Public Trust Act, Mumbai. The assessee is engaged in imparting education. The assessee is also having registration under Section 12A and recognition certificate under Section 80G of the Act. For the A.Y. 2017-18, the assessee filed its return of income on 17/10/2017 declaring income of Rs. 2,41,990/- . In the computation of income

NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 383, 384 & 385/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi, Jhagadia, Ward-1, Vs. Bharuch. Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

charitable trust registered under Public Trust Act, Mumbai. The assessee is engaged in imparting education. The assessee is also having registration under Section 12A and recognition certificate under Section 80G of the Act. For the A.Y. 2017-18, the assessee filed its return of income on 17/10/2017 declaring income of Rs. 2,41,990/- . In the computation of income

NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 383, 384 & 385/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi, Jhagadia, Ward-1, Vs. Bharuch. Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

charitable trust registered under Public Trust Act, Mumbai. The assessee is engaged in imparting education. The assessee is also having registration under Section 12A and recognition certificate under Section 80G of the Act. For the A.Y. 2017-18, the assessee filed its return of income on 17/10/2017 declaring income of Rs. 2,41,990/- . In the computation of income

LIONS UMRA PIPLOD EDUCATION SOCIETY,SURAT vs. A.O. CIRCLE-2, EXEPTION, , AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Virtual Hearing In Virtual Court) Lions Umra Piplod Education Society, The Assessing Officer, Opp. Lake View Garden, C/O. Circle-2, Exemption, Vs. Shardayatan School, Piplod, Surat- Ahmedabad. 395007, Gujarat. Pan : Aaatl1289Q Appellant Respondednt

trust is also placed record at page 8 ITA No. 197/SRT/2021/AY.2017-18 Lions Umra Piplod Education Society no.73 to 112. In the intimation under section 143(1), the Assessing Officer disallowed whole of the revenue and capital expenditure. The ld. AR submits that assessee filed detailed written submission before the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC. The ld. CIT(A) /NFAC failed

UDHNA ACADEMY EDUCATION TRUST,,SURAT vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2,, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Arjun Lal Saini(Virtual Hearing) आ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.3023/Ahd/2015 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2011-12 Udhna Academy Education Trust, V The Assistant Commissioner Central Road No.14, Udhyog Nagar S Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Surat. Sangh, Udhna, Surat – 394 210. . [Pan: Aaatu 0431 F] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 21.03.2014 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2011-12. 2. The assessee raised the following grounds of appeal as under: That on facts and in law the learned Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals) “(1). has grievously erred in confirming the disallowance of depreciation of Rs.44,59,566/-. (2) That the learned

SAHAKARI KHAND UDUOG MANDAL LTD.,NA vs. ARIVS.DCIT, NAVSARI CIRCLE, NAVSARI, NAVSARI

In the result, all the appeals are disposed of in the manner indicated\nhereinbefore

charitable trust.\n(vi) That the appellant could not prove that a higher price was paid by\nit to the farmers on account of higher yield or some other factors.\nBesides nowhere it has been claimed that at the time of supply of\nsugarcane by the farmers to the appellant, any agreement or contract\nfor payment of price higher than

SHREE KHEDUT SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD.,BARDOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARDOLI

In the result, all the appeals are disposed of in the manner indicated\nhereinbefore

charitable trust.\n(vi) That the appellant could not prove that a higher price was paid by\nit to the farmers on account of higher yield or some other factors.\nBesides nowhere it has been claimed that at the time of supply of\nsugarcane by the farmers to the appellant, any agreement or contract\n25\nfor payment of price higher

AL MEHMOOD CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1(5),, BHARUCH

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee (ITA No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.92 & 93/Srt/2022 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: (2016-17 & 2017-18) (Physical Court Hearing) Al Mehmood Charitable Trust, Income Tax Officer, By Pass Road Jambusar, Vs. Ward-1(5), Bharuch. Bharuch-392150 (Appellant) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaata 2702 M िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca राज"व क" ओर से /Respondent By Shri Ashok B. Koli, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing 12/01/2023 उ"ोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 24/01/2023

section 143(1) of the Act, by making adjustments, based on the technical issue (not filing the audit report on time), hence there is no adjudication on merit by the Assessing Officer. ITA Nos.92-93/SRT/2022 AYs.16-17 & 17-18 Al Mehmood Charitable Trust

AL MEHMOOD CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1(5),, BHARUCH

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee (ITA No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.92 & 93/Srt/2022 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: (2016-17 & 2017-18) (Physical Court Hearing) Al Mehmood Charitable Trust, Income Tax Officer, By Pass Road Jambusar, Vs. Ward-1(5), Bharuch. Bharuch-392150 (Appellant) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaata 2702 M िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca राज"व क" ओर से /Respondent By Shri Ashok B. Koli, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing 12/01/2023 उ"ोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 24/01/2023

section 143(1) of the Act, by making adjustments, based on the technical issue (not filing the audit report on time), hence there is no adjudication on merit by the Assessing Officer. ITA Nos.92-93/SRT/2022 AYs.16-17 & 17-18 Al Mehmood Charitable Trust

TRINITY EDUCATION TRUST,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) Trinity Education Trust, The Income Tax Officer, 1C-4, Row House, Exemption Vs Muktanand Nagar, Sardar Ward, Surat. Bridge, Adajan, Surat. Pan: Aabtt4722H Appellant/ Revenue Respondent/ Assessee

charitable trust and engaged in imparting education. The assessee filed its return of income for the assessment year (AY) 2014-15 on 16.03.2015, declaring total income of Rs. 24,48,705/-. In the computation of income the assessee deduction of Rs. 22,74,373/- under section 11 of the Act. The return of income was processed under section 143(1

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, , VAPI vs. M/S MAHAVIR JAIN CHARITABLE TRUST, VALSAD

In the result, the grounds of Revenue’s appeal are dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Sainiआ.अ.सं./Ita No.208/Srt/2023 (Ay 2018-19) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Deputy Commissioner Of M/S Mahavir Jain Income-Tax, Central Circle-Vapi, Charitable Trust, 410/411, Vs 9Th Floor, Fortune Square Ii, Amar Chambers, Station Daman Road, Chala, Vapi- Road, Opp. Lal School, 396191 Valsad-396001 Pan No. Aamts 6784 K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

section 143(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’ for the sake of brevity) on 11.09.2021. The Revenue has raised following grounds of appeal: “1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.5,60,00,000/- made on account

SAHADARI KHAND UDYOG MANDAL LTD.,,NA vs. ARIVS.ACIT, NAVSARI CIRCLE, NAVSARI, NAVSARI

charitable trust.\n(vi) That the appellant could not prove that a higher price was paid by\nit to the farmers on account of higher yield or some other factors.\nBesides nowhere it has been claimed that at the time of supply of\nsugarcane by the farmers to the appellant, any agreement or contract\nfor payment of price higher than

SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDAL LTD.,,GANDEVI vs. ACIT, NAVSARI CIRCLE, NAVSARI, NAVSARI

charitable trust.\n(vi) That the appellant could not prove that a higher price was paid by\nit to the farmers on account of higher yield or some other factors.\nBesides nowhere it has been claimed that at the time of supply of\nsugarcane by the farmers to the appellant, any agreement or contract\nfor payment of price higher than

MAROLI VIBHAG KHAND UDYOG SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD,.,NA vs. ARIVS.ACIT, NAVSARI CIRCLE, , NAVSARI

charitable trust.\n(vi) That the appellant could not prove that a higher price was paid by\nit to the farmers on account of higher yield or some other factors.\nBesides nowhere it has been claimed that at the time of supply of\nsugarcane by the farmers to the appellant, any agreement or contract\nfor payment of price higher than

ACIT, NA vs. ARI CIRCLE, NAVSARIVS.M/S. MAROLI VIBHAG KHAND UDYOG SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD.,, NAVSARI

In the result, all the appeals are disposed of in the manner indicated\nhereinbefore

charitable trust.\n(vi) That the appellant could not prove that a higher price was paid by\nit to the farmers on account of higher yield or some other factors.\nBesides nowhere it has been claimed that at the time of supply of\nsugarcane by the farmers to the appellant, any agreement or contract\nfor payment of price higher than