BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

46 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 13(1)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai842Delhi748Karnataka514Chennai478Bangalore394Pune197Jaipur189Ahmedabad188Kolkata153Hyderabad132Chandigarh108Lucknow64Cochin57Indore50Surat46Rajkot43Cuttack37Amritsar36Visakhapatnam34Agra28Jodhpur25Telangana25Calcutta24Nagpur23Allahabad20Raipur18SC16Kerala10Guwahati8Patna8Varanasi7Dehradun6Punjab & Haryana5Rajasthan5Jabalpur3Ranchi3Panaji3Andhra Pradesh2Orissa2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 12A124Section 80G(5)72Exemption45Section 12A(1)(ac)40Section 1137Charitable Trust15Section 2(15)14Section 1213Section 1012

MAR BASELIUS ORTHODOX SYRIAN CHURCH,SURAT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 214/SRT/2023[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Surat17 Jul 2023AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.214/Srt/2023 (Physical Hearing) Mar Baselius Orthodox Syrian Church, Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Ranchhod Nagar, Opp. Magdalla Port Colony, Ahmedabad Dumas Road, Magdalla B.O., Magdalla, Surat – 395007. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatm3808N (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.265/Srt/2023 (Physical Hearing) Sindhu Seva Samiti, Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Tp No.3 Fp 53, Anand Mahal Road, Ahmedabad Near Sneh Sankul Wadi, Adajan Choryasi, Surat – 395009. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabts3067J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 13(1)(a)Section 13(1)(b)

c. Indian Society of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (86 taxmann.com 44) d. Chandra Charitable Trust (156 TAXMAN 19) 13. The Ld. Counsel also argued that decision referred by Ld. CIT(E) in the case of Dewood Bohara Jamat (43 taxmann.com 243), favours the assessee, as the assessee trust is religious as well as charitable-trust

Showing 1–20 of 46 · Page 1 of 3

Section 80G(5)(vi)10
Addition to Income9
Deduction8

SINDHU SEVA SAMITI,SURAT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 265/SRT/2023[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Surat17 Jul 2023AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.214/Srt/2023 (Physical Hearing) Mar Baselius Orthodox Syrian Church, Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Ranchhod Nagar, Opp. Magdalla Port Colony, Ahmedabad Dumas Road, Magdalla B.O., Magdalla, Surat – 395007. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatm3808N (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.265/Srt/2023 (Physical Hearing) Sindhu Seva Samiti, Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Tp No.3 Fp 53, Anand Mahal Road, Ahmedabad Near Sneh Sankul Wadi, Adajan Choryasi, Surat – 395009. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabts3067J (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 13(1)(a)Section 13(1)(b)

c. Indian Society of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (86 taxmann.com 44) d. Chandra Charitable Trust (156 TAXMAN 19) 13. The Ld. Counsel also argued that decision referred by Ld. CIT(E) in the case of Dewood Bohara Jamat (43 taxmann.com 243), favours the assessee, as the assessee trust is religious as well as charitable-trust

SHRI VIDHYASAGAR SANT NIVAS TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

ITA 242/SRT/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)

Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 2(15)Section 80G(5)

c), Ist proviso to section 2(15) and No any action has been taken by the department for any default under these provisions or for any other law in force. 9. No demand has been raised by the Income-tax during the last 3 Year. 10. The Trust is dedicated to the upliftment of the general public, with no specific

SHRI VIDHYASAGAR SANT NIVAS TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

ITA 243/SRT/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Jul 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)

Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 2(15)Section 80G(5)

c), Ist proviso to section 2(15) and No any action has been taken by the department for any default under these provisions or for any other law in force. 9. No demand has been raised by the Income-tax during the last 3 Year. 10. The Trust is dedicated to the upliftment of the general public, with no specific

SHAMBHUBHAI PATEL CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1169/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable entities, which was notified vide Notification No 19/2021 dated 26.03.2021, the entities seeking re- registration/ approval or provisional registration/ approval (fresh) are required to file an application in Form 10A. Further, the order granting registration or provisional registration or approval or provisional approval is made in Form 10AC subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions. 4. In view

BARDOLI VIBHAG GRAM VIKAS CREDIT SOCIETY ,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1180/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable entities, which was notified vide Notification No 19/2021 dated 26.03.2021, the entities seeking re- registration/ approval or provisional registration/ approval (fresh) are required to file an application in Form 10A. Further, the order granting registration or provisional registration or approval or provisional approval is made in Form 10AC subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions. 4. In view

SARDAR VALLABHBHAI PATEL EDUCATION SOCIETY,BARDOLI vs. CIT(EXEMTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1165/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable entities, which was notified vide Notification No 19/2021 dated 26.03.2021, the entities seeking re- registration/ approval or provisional registration/ approval (fresh) are required to file an application in Form 10A. Further, the order granting registration or provisional registration or approval or provisional approval is made in Form 10AC subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions. 4. In view

BAJIPURA GRAM VIKASH TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1171/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable entities, which was notified vide Notification No 19/2021 dated 26.03.2021, the entities seeking re- registration/ approval or provisional registration/ approval (fresh) are required to file an application in Form 10A. Further, the order granting registration or provisional registration or approval or provisional approval is made in Form 10AC subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions. 4. In view

SHREE PALWADA KELVANI MANDAL,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1176/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable entities, which was notified vide Notification No 19/2021 dated 26.03.2021, the entities seeking re- registration/ approval or provisional registration/ approval (fresh) are required to file an application in Form 10A. Further, the order granting registration or provisional registration or approval or provisional approval is made in Form 10AC subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions. 4. In view

PATIDAR SAMAJ,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1172/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable entities, which was notified vide Notification No 19/2021 dated 26.03.2021, the entities seeking re- registration/ approval or provisional registration/ approval (fresh) are required to file an application in Form 10A. Further, the order granting registration or provisional registration or approval or provisional approval is made in Form 10AC subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions. 4. In view

PATHRADIA GRAM VIKAS MANDAL TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1174/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable entities, which was notified vide Notification No 19/2021 dated 26.03.2021, the entities seeking re- registration/ approval or provisional registration/ approval (fresh) are required to file an application in Form 10A. Further, the order granting registration or provisional registration or approval or provisional approval is made in Form 10AC subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions. 4. In view

SHREE RAM KABIR MANDIR TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1178/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable entities, which was notified vide Notification No 19/2021 dated 26.03.2021, the entities seeking re- registration/ approval or provisional registration/ approval (fresh) are required to file an application in Form 10A. Further, the order granting registration or provisional registration or approval or provisional approval is made in Form 10AC subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions. 4. In view

SURAT EDUCATION SOCIETY,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1167/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable entities, which was notified vide Notification No 19/2021 dated 26.03.2021, the entities seeking re- registration/ approval or provisional registration/ approval (fresh) are required to file an application in Form 10A. Further, the order granting registration or provisional registration or approval or provisional approval is made in Form 10AC subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions. 4. In view

SARDAR PATEL VIDYA SANKUL,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1163/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

charitable entities, which was notified vide Notification No 19/2021 dated 26.03.2021, the entities seeking re- registration/ approval or provisional registration/ approval (fresh) are required to file an application in Form 10A. Further, the order granting registration or provisional registration or approval or provisional approval is made in Form 10AC subject to the fulfilment of certain conditions. 4. In view

SHREE VIMALJIN RELIGIOUS CHARITABLE TRUST,VAPI vs. ASSTT. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 239/SRT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 239/Srt/2021 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2016-17) (Physical Court Hearing) Shree Vimaljin Religious Charitable Trust, Vs. The Acit, Cpc, 102, Shantinath Apartment, Nehru Street, Bangaluru. Vapi-396191. (Assessee) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aalts6046F

Section 10Section 10(23)Section 11Section 12ASection 139Section 143(1)Section 2(15)

C Parikh & co (India) Ltd. (1956) 29 ITR 661 (SC)]. 7.3 In view of the above facts and respectfully following the judgments outlined in para 7.2 of this order, it is held that the Assessee is not entitled to exemption u/s 11 of the Act on account of non-registration u/s 12AA of the Act. On this issue, there

ABHYUTHTHAN GRAM VIKAS MANDAL,SURAT vs. CIT EXEMPTION, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee and the Revenue, both are dismissed

ITA 838/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat19 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 11Section 11(1)Section 13(1)(c)Section 194CSection 2(15)Section 250

Charitable Trust registered with the State Charity Commissioner, undertook irrigation projects awarded by Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd. During assessment, the Assessing Officer treated the activities of the assessee as business u/s 2(15) and denied exemption u/s 11 of the Act. The Assessing Officer invoked Sections 13(1)(c

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-SURAT, SURAT vs. ABHYUTHTHAN GRAM VIKAS MANDAL, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee and the Revenue, both are dismissed

ITA 902/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat19 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, Vice-Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 11Section 11(1)Section 13(1)(c)Section 194CSection 2(15)Section 250

Charitable Trust registered with the State Charity Commissioner, undertook irrigation projects awarded by Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd. During assessment, the Assessing Officer treated the activities of the assessee as business u/s 2(15) and denied exemption u/s 11 of the Act. The Assessing Officer invoked Sections 13(1)(c

SHRI RAM EDUCATION & GRAMINVIKAS CHARITABLE TRUST,VALSAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTION WARD), SURAT

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 213/SRT/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Sainishri Ram Education & I.T.O., (Exemption Ward) Graminvikas Charitable Trust, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Jauagauri Park, Hathikhana, Majura Gate, Dharampur, Surat. Valsad-396050. Pan No. Aalts 324 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 10(23)(C)Section 11aSection 12ASection 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 254(1)

C) of the Act for claiming exemption under Section 11and 12 of the Act. Bank statement received from the banker of assessee, in response to notice under Section 133(6) was also enclosed alongwith the said show cause notice. The Assessing Officer recorded that representative of assessee appeared, however, only part information was supplied in tapal, accordingly the Assessing Officer

SHREE SAINATH SARVAJANIK SEWA MANDAL TRUST,UNA vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 204/SRT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat22 Jul 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.204/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2016-17) (Physical Court Hearing) Shree Sainath Sarvajanik Sewa Vs. The Ito, Exemption Ward, Mandal Trust, Surat. N.H. No.8, Near Ganesh Sisodra, Unn-396445, Gujarat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aafts7802P (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca Revenue By: Shri J. K. Chandnani, Sr. Dr सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 12/05/2022 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 22/07/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A. L. Saini: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2016-17, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), [In Short ‘Ld. Cit(A)’] National Faceless Appeal Centre (In Short ‘Nfac), Delhi, In Appeal No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2021-22/1036051308(1) Dated 30.09.2021, Which In Turn Arises Out Of A Penalty Order Passed By Assessing Officer U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri J. K. Chandnani, Sr. DR
Section 11(6)Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(C)Section 271(1)(c)

charitable trust and registered u/s 12A of the IT Act. The assessee filed its return of income for A.Y.2016-17 on 21.09.2016 declaring total income at Rs. Nil and thereby claiming refund of Rs.7,20,730/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was finalized u/s 143(3) by making addition of Rs.20,63,925/- on account of disallowance

ITO (EXEMPTION) WARD, SURAT vs. GUJARAT HIRA BOURSE, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue (in ITA No

ITA 189/SRT/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 13Section 13(8)Section 2(15)Section 254(1)

13(a) r.w.s.2 (15) and denied exemption under section 11 and 12. On appeal before Ld. CIT(A), the assessee was allowed relief by following his predecessors’ decision in earlier years in AY 2010-11, 2012-13 & 2013-14 respectively. We find that against the of Ld. CIT(A) in AYs 2010-11, 2012-13 and 2013-14 on similar