SHREE RAM KABIR MANDIR TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

c) where the application is made under item (A) of sub-clause (vi) of the said clause or the application is made under sub-clause (vi) of the said clause, as it stood immediately before its amendment vide the Finance Act, 2023, pass an order in writing provisionally registering the trust or institution for a period of three years from

PATHRADIA GRAM VIKAS MANDAL TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

c) where the application is made under item (A) of sub-clause (vi) of the said clause or the application is made under sub-clause (vi) of the said clause, as it stood immediately before its amendment vide the Finance Act, 2023, pass an order in writing provisionally registering the trust or institution for a period of three years from

SARDAR VALLABHBHAI PATEL EDUCATION SOCIETY,BARDOLI vs. CIT(EXEMTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

c) where the application is made under item (A) of sub-clause (vi) of the said clause or the application is made under sub-clause (vi) of the said clause, as it stood immediately before its amendment vide the Finance Act, 2023, pass an order in writing provisionally registering the trust or institution for a period of three years from

BAJIPURA GRAM VIKASH TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

c) where the application is made under item (A) of sub-clause (vi) of the said clause or the application is made under sub-clause (vi) of the said clause, as it stood immediately before its amendment vide the Finance Act, 2023, pass an order in writing provisionally registering the trust or institution for a period of three years from

SURAT EDUCATION SOCIETY,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

c) where the application is made under item (A) of sub-clause (vi) of the said clause or the application is made under sub-clause (vi) of the said clause, as it stood immediately before its amendment vide the Finance Act, 2023, pass an order in writing provisionally registering the trust or institution for a period of three years from

BARDOLI VIBHAG GRAM VIKAS CREDIT SOCIETY ,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

c) where the application is made under item (A) of sub-clause (vi) of the said clause or the application is made under sub-clause (vi) of the said clause, as it stood immediately before its amendment vide the Finance Act, 2023, pass an order in writing provisionally registering the trust or institution for a period of three years from

SHREE PALWADA KELVANI MANDAL,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

c) where the application is made under item (A) of sub-clause (vi) of the said clause or the application is made under sub-clause (vi) of the said clause, as it stood immediately before its amendment vide the Finance Act, 2023, pass an order in writing provisionally registering the trust or institution for a period of three years from

SHAMBHUBHAI PATEL CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

c) where the application is made under item (A) of sub-clause (vi) of the said clause or the application is made under sub-clause (vi) of the said clause, as it stood immediately before its amendment vide the Finance Act, 2023, pass an order in writing provisionally registering the trust or institution for a period of three years from

PATIDAR SAMAJ,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

c) where the application is made under item (A) of sub-clause (vi) of the said clause or the application is made under sub-clause (vi) of the said clause, as it stood immediately before its amendment vide the Finance Act, 2023, pass an order in writing provisionally registering the trust or institution for a period of three years from

SARDAR PATEL VIDYA SANKUL,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

c) where the application is made under item (A) of sub-clause (vi) of the said clause or the application is made under sub-clause (vi) of the said clause, as it stood immediately before its amendment vide the Finance Act, 2023, pass an order in writing provisionally registering the trust or institution for a period of three years from

MAR BASELIUS ORTHODOX SYRIAN CHURCH,SURAT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.214/Srt/2023 (Physical Hearing) Mar Baselius Orthodox Syrian Church, Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Ranchhod Nagar, Opp. Magdalla Port Colony, Ahmedabad Dumas Road, Magdalla B.O., Magdalla, Surat – 395007. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatm3808N (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.265/Srt/2023 (Physical Hearing) Sindhu Seva Samiti, Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Tp No.3 Fp 53, Anand Mahal Road, Ahmedabad Near Sneh Sankul Wadi, Adajan Choryasi, Surat – 395009. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabts3067J (Appellant) (Respondent)

11. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT(E), the assessee is in appeal before us. 12. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee argued that objects of trust are purely charitable without discrimination of creed, nationally or place except name, since it is started by ‘Sindhis’. The activities not doubted by Ld. CIT(E). Section 13(1

SINDHU SEVA SAMITI,SURAT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.214/Srt/2023 (Physical Hearing) Mar Baselius Orthodox Syrian Church, Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Ranchhod Nagar, Opp. Magdalla Port Colony, Ahmedabad Dumas Road, Magdalla B.O., Magdalla, Surat – 395007. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatm3808N (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.265/Srt/2023 (Physical Hearing) Sindhu Seva Samiti, Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Tp No.3 Fp 53, Anand Mahal Road, Ahmedabad Near Sneh Sankul Wadi, Adajan Choryasi, Surat – 395009. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabts3067J (Appellant) (Respondent)

11. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT(E), the assessee is in appeal before us. 12. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee argued that objects of trust are purely charitable without discrimination of creed, nationally or place except name, since it is started by ‘Sindhis’. The activities not doubted by Ld. CIT(E). Section 13(1

SHRI VIDHYASAGAR SANT NIVAS TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)

c), Ist proviso to section 2(15) and No any action has been taken by the department for any default under these provisions or for any other law in force. 9. No demand has been raised by the Income-tax during the last 3 Year. 10. The Trust is dedicated to the upliftment of the general public, with no specific

SHRI VIDHYASAGAR SANT NIVAS TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)

c), Ist proviso to section 2(15) and No any action has been taken by the department for any default under these provisions or for any other law in force. 9. No demand has been raised by the Income-tax during the last 3 Year. 10. The Trust is dedicated to the upliftment of the general public, with no specific

SHREE PARISHRAM EDUCATION & MEDICAL CHARITABLE TRUST,,VADODARA vs. THE PR. CIT(CENTRAL),, SURAT

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No. 610/Ahd/2016/Srt िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : Shree Parishram Education & Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Medical Charitable Trust, Income-Tax (Central), At Bakrol, Near Madhav Nagar, Surat. Ajwa-Nimeta Road, Tal. Waghodia, Dist. Vadodara-390010 Pan: Aaatp9715H अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 provides for exemption of Income of the trusts involved in charitable activities. However, as per the above stated facts, it is clear that the motive of the trust is making profit rather than the object of charitable activity. Therefore, explanation was called for from the trust vide letter

SHRI RAM EDUCATION & GRAMINVIKAS CHARITABLE TRUST,VALSAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTION WARD), SURAT

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Sainishri Ram Education & I.T.O., (Exemption Ward) Graminvikas Charitable Trust, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Jauagauri Park, Hathikhana, Majura Gate, Dharampur, Surat. Valsad-396050. Pan No. Aalts 324 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

C) of the Act for claiming exemption under Section 11and 12 of the Act. Bank statement received from the banker of assessee, in response to notice under Section 133(6) was also enclosed alongwith the said show cause notice. The Assessing Officer recorded that representative of assessee appeared, however, only part information was supplied in tapal, accordingly the Assessing Officer

ITO (EXEMPTION), WARD, SURAT vs. GUJARAT HIRA BOURSE, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue (in ITA No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

1,31,94,744/- (Rs.2,22,87,522- Rs.90,92,777). Once the gross interest income is added and again gross excess income over expenses ( Rs. 2,22,87,522 – Rs.90,92,772), Rs.1,31,94,745 is added, then it resulted in double addition/disallowance to that extent. Thus, Rs.1,31,94,745/- is double addition which is not sustainable

ITO (EXEMPTION) WARD, SURAT vs. GUJARAT HIRA BOURSE, SURAT

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue (in ITA No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

1,31,94,744/- (Rs.2,22,87,522- Rs.90,92,777). Once the gross interest income is added and again gross excess income over expenses ( Rs. 2,22,87,522 – Rs.90,92,772), Rs.1,31,94,745 is added, then it resulted in double addition/disallowance to that extent. Thus, Rs.1,31,94,745/- is double addition which is not sustainable

SHREE SAINATH SARVAJANIK SEWA MANDAL TRUST,UNA vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.204/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2016-17) (Physical Court Hearing) Shree Sainath Sarvajanik Sewa Vs. The Ito, Exemption Ward, Mandal Trust, Surat. N.H. No.8, Near Ganesh Sisodra, Unn-396445, Gujarat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aafts7802P (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca Revenue By: Shri J. K. Chandnani, Sr. Dr सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 12/05/2022 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 22/07/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A. L. Saini: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2016-17, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), [In Short ‘Ld. Cit(A)’] National Faceless Appeal Centre (In Short ‘Nfac), Delhi, In Appeal No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2021-22/1036051308(1) Dated 30.09.2021, Which In Turn Arises Out Of A Penalty Order Passed By Assessing Officer U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

11(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Making of a patently wrong and inadmissible claim for deduction/exemption by the assessee is clearly tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income which attracts the levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, therefore assessing officer imposed a penalty of Rs.4,57,504/- under section 271(1