SHREE BRAHMAJYOTI SANSKAR DHAM TRUST ,SURAT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTION) AHMEDABAD , AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.74/Srt/2025 Assessment Year: (2025-26) (Hybrid Hearing) Shree Brahmajyoti Sanskar Dham Trust, Vs. Cit (Exemption), 9, Gopal Krushna Society, Behind Arihant Ahmedabad Park, Ambika Niketan, Athwalines, Surat – 395007, Gujarat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aawts9225R (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Hiren Vepari, Ca Respondent By Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 19/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 31/10/2025

section 80G(5) of the Act was rejected and he also cancelled the provisional registration granted earlier. 4. Aggrieved by the order of CIT(E), the assessee filed appeal before the Tribunal. The learned Authorized Representative (ld. AR) of the assessee filed a paper book containing 130 pages, including copy of Form 10AC granting provisional registration u/s 12AB, copy

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXAMPTION) WARD, SURAT vs. SHREE SAIBABA SATSANG MANDAL, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

46,631/- for the reason that entire cost of said assets is allowed as deduction as "application of income” in the year of acquisition. Therefore, theAssessing Officer is of the view that, granting of depreciation in this year amounts to double deduction. On appeal, the ld CIT(A) allowed the claim of the assessee. Aggrieved, the Revenue is in appeal

SHREE HARI RAM CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. ITO EXEMPTION , SURAT

In the result, the appeal of assessee is treated as dismissed being infructuous

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Physical Hearing) Shree Hari Ram Charitable Trust, I.T.O.(Exemptions), 304, Meghdhanush Complex, Ward-Surat. Vs. Adajan Patia, Adajan Surat, Gujarat, India- 395009. Pan No. Aajts 1057 L Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

10(23C) instead of Section 11 of the Act. The assessee rectified the said mistake in response to defect notice issued by the CPC and filed fresh return of income on 19/06/2017. The return of assessee was processed by CPC, Bangalore vide order dated 12/07/2019 and claimed the deduction under Section 11 of the Act. The assessee tried to file

S M K R VASHI HIGH SCHOOL,NA vs. ARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.515/Srt/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2021-22) (Physical Court Hearing) S.M.K.R Vashi High School Income Tax Officer-Exemption Ward, Surat, Aaykar Bhavan, Umbhrat Road Maroli Bazar, Vs. Majura Gate, Surat-395001 Jalalpore Navsari-396436 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aalfs 0980 J (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

10. Ms. Chaitali Shah, Learned Counsel for the assessee submitted the following documents before the Bench, viz: (i) Registration certificate granted u/s 12AA (vide pg No.1 of paper book), (ii) Audited financial statements, vide pg-2 to 17 of paper book, (iii) Audit report in Form 10B obtained u/s 12A(b) attached at the time of filing Form 10BB, vide

SHREE KHEDUT SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD.,BARDOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARDOLI

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijyananda Pruseth

10. The Id. AR also submitted that the fixation of the final cane price is not an arbitrary unilateral act but occurs under a regulatory umbrella involving the oversight or concurrence of statutory authorities such as the Director of Sugar, Gujarat State, and the Registrar and District Registrar of Co-operative Societies. The cane price is declared, approved and recorded