BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 10(38)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka465Delhi463Mumbai372Bangalore180Chennai148Ahmedabad108Jaipur105Pune74Hyderabad73Chandigarh65Kolkata59Lucknow44Cochin34Allahabad31Cuttack31Indore27Visakhapatnam24Calcutta16Amritsar15Agra14Surat13Rajkot13Nagpur12Telangana9Kerala8Raipur7SC7Dehradun6Jodhpur6Varanasi6Rajasthan4Patna4Ranchi4Punjab & Haryana3T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Andhra Pradesh1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 12A41Section 12A(1)(ac)40Section 1112Exemption12Section 1210Section 11(1)(d)5Section 143(3)2Addition to Income2

SURAT EDUCATION SOCIETY,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1167/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

38 of 2020)], within three months from the first day of April, 2021; (ii) where the trust or institution is registered under section 12AB or approved under sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of section 10 and the period of the said registration or approval, as the case

BARDOLI VIBHAG GRAM VIKAS CREDIT SOCIETY ,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1180/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

38 of 2020)], within three months from the first day of April, 2021; (ii) where the trust or institution is registered under section 12AB or approved under sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of section 10 and the period of the said registration or approval, as the case

PATHRADIA GRAM VIKAS MANDAL TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1174/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

38 of 2020)], within three months from the first day of April, 2021; (ii) where the trust or institution is registered under section 12AB or approved under sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of section 10 and the period of the said registration or approval, as the case

SHREE RAM KABIR MANDIR TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1178/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

38 of 2020)], within three months from the first day of April, 2021; (ii) where the trust or institution is registered under section 12AB or approved under sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of section 10 and the period of the said registration or approval, as the case

SHREE PALWADA KELVANI MANDAL,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1176/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

38 of 2020)], within three months from the first day of April, 2021; (ii) where the trust or institution is registered under section 12AB or approved under sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of section 10 and the period of the said registration or approval, as the case

SHAMBHUBHAI PATEL CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1169/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

38 of 2020)], within three months from the first day of April, 2021; (ii) where the trust or institution is registered under section 12AB or approved under sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of section 10 and the period of the said registration or approval, as the case

PATIDAR SAMAJ,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1172/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

38 of 2020)], within three months from the first day of April, 2021; (ii) where the trust or institution is registered under section 12AB or approved under sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of section 10 and the period of the said registration or approval, as the case

SARDAR PATEL VIDYA SANKUL,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1163/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

38 of 2020)], within three months from the first day of April, 2021; (ii) where the trust or institution is registered under section 12AB or approved under sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of section 10 and the period of the said registration or approval, as the case

SARDAR VALLABHBHAI PATEL EDUCATION SOCIETY,BARDOLI vs. CIT(EXEMTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1165/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

38 of 2020)], within three months from the first day of April, 2021; (ii) where the trust or institution is registered under section 12AB or approved under sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of section 10 and the period of the said registration or approval, as the case

BAJIPURA GRAM VIKASH TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1171/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Bijayananda Prusethsl.

For Appellant: Shri Akshay Mitish Kumar ModiFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-D.R
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

38 of 2020)], within three months from the first day of April, 2021; (ii) where the trust or institution is registered under section 12AB or approved under sub-clause (iv) or sub-clause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of section 10 and the period of the said registration or approval, as the case

SOUTHERN GUJARAT CHAMBER TRADE & INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT CENTRE,,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,, SURAT

In the result the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 910/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 Jul 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh () & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini ()

For Appellant: Mr. Rasesh Shah & Ms ChaitaliFor Respondent: Mr. O.P. Vaishnav, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 2Section 2(15)Section 234ASection 234BSection 254(1)

10%. To support the scheme the Statement Government allotted 12 hectors of land at a concessional price. 4. The learned AR for the assessee submits that the assessee entered into an agreement with Sar Infracon Private Limited, a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) was formed at the behest of the Central Government. Sar Infracon Private Limited is also a Company registered

LOK BHARTI MANDAL,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) WARD, SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 212/SRT/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Jun 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.212/Srt/2023 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2008-09) (Physical Hearing) Lok Bharati Mandal, Vs. The Ito, Bharatia Vidhya Sankul, Opp. Terapanthi (Exemption) Ward, Bhavan, City Light Ropad, Surat. Surat – 395007. (Assessee) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaatl2524Q Assessee By Shri Hiren Vepari, Ca Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr 04/05/2023 Date Of Hearing Date Of Pronouncement 16/06/2023

Section 11(1)(d)Section 143(3)

section 11(1)(d) of the Act of Rs.51,38,851/- received as earmarked funds, being corpus donation. ITA 212/SRT/2023/AY.2008-09 Lok Bharti Mandal 5. The facts necessary for disposal of the appeal are stated in brief. During the course of re-assessment proceedings, it was observed by the assessing officer that assessee had reported total additions of Rs.51,38

SHREE KHEDUT SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD.,BARDOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARDOLI

ITA 738/SRT/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat25 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijyananda Pruseth

Section 143(3)Section 37(1)

10. The Id. AR also submitted that the fixation of the final cane price is not an arbitrary unilateral act but occurs under a regulatory umbrella involving the oversight or concurrence of statutory authorities such as the Director of Sugar, Gujarat State, and the Registrar and District Registrar of Co-operative Societies. The cane price is declared, approved and recorded