NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 383, 384 & 385/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi, Jhagadia, Ward-1, Vs. Bharuch. Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

charitable trust registered under Public Trust Act, Mumbai. The assessee is engaged in imparting education. The assessee is also having registration under Section 12A and recognition certificate under Section 80G of the Act. For the A.Y. 2017-18, the assessee filed its return of income on 17/10/2017 declaring income of Rs. 2,41,990/- . In the computation of income

NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 383, 384 & 385/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi, Jhagadia, Ward-1, Vs. Bharuch. Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

charitable trust registered under Public Trust Act, Mumbai. The assessee is engaged in imparting education. The assessee is also having registration under Section 12A and recognition certificate under Section 80G of the Act. For the A.Y. 2017-18, the assessee filed its return of income on 17/10/2017 declaring income of Rs. 2,41,990/- . In the computation of income

NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 383, 384 & 385/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi, Jhagadia, Ward-1, Vs. Bharuch. Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

charitable trust registered under Public Trust Act, Mumbai. The assessee is engaged in imparting education. The assessee is also having registration under Section 12A and recognition certificate under Section 80G of the Act. For the A.Y. 2017-18, the assessee filed its return of income on 17/10/2017 declaring income of Rs. 2,41,990/- . In the computation of income

SHREE SUIGAM KHODADHOR PANJARA POLE,SURAT vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

charitable trust registered under section 12A, had substantially satisfied condition for availing benefit of exemption as a trust, it could not be denied exemption merely on bar of limitation in furnishing audit report in Form no. 10B. 7.5 In the case of CIT v. Gujarat Oil & Allied Industries [1993] 201 ITR 325 (Guj.), the High Court held that where

SHRI VIDHYASAGAR SANT NIVAS TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)

35 held that the provisions of Section 13 of the Act would be attracted only at the time of assessment, since the quantum of expenses made for religious and common purposes can be determined from Profit and Loss accounts only and not at the time of granting registration u/s. 12A of the Act following Jurisdictional High Court decision

SHRI VIDHYASAGAR SANT NIVAS TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)

35 held that the provisions of Section 13 of the Act would be attracted only at the time of assessment, since the quantum of expenses made for religious and common purposes can be determined from Profit and Loss accounts only and not at the time of granting registration u/s. 12A of the Act following Jurisdictional High Court decision

MASJID-E-MOAZZAN & MAZAR-E-SAIFEE,,SURAT vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.451/Ahd/2015 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2011-12 Masjid-E-Moazzan & Mazar-E- Assistant Commissioner Saifee, Of Income Tax, 3/873, Devdi Mubarak, Circle-2, Surat Zampa Bazar, Surat 395002 Pan:Aatmb 8182 R अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

35,564 towards the object of the trust and claimed depreciation at Rs.1,39,85,615. Thus, if expenditure on object of trust is deducted then there remains only balance of Rs.57,881 so as to enable the trust to claim deduction under section 11(1)(a) of the Act. This shows that the assessee has availed the benefit before

KETAN N. SHAH (HUF) ,VAPI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5, VAPI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.321/Srt/2018,िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 (Virtual Court) Ketan N. Shah (Huf), Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Plot No.275, Usha Hospital & Life Ward -5, Vapi. Science Charitable Trust, Near Cine Park, Chanod, Vapi – 396195. [Pan: Aahhk 4703 R] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri Hardikvora– Ar िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Smt. Anupama Singla – Sr.Dr राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By सुनवाई क" तारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 20.10.2020 उ"ोषणा क" तारीख/Pronouncement On: 20.10.2020 आदेश /O R D E R Per Pawan Singh, Judical Memebr: 1. This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-1 [“Cit(A)” ], Valsad, State Of Gujarat,Dated 27.03.2018 For The Assessment Year 2013-14.This Appeal Was Initially Adjudicated Vide Order Dated 31.07.2019. However, The Order Was Recalled Vide Order Dated 02.01.2020 In Ma No.59/Srt/2019, Thus, In The Aforesaid Background, The Appeal Was Heard Afresh.The Assessee Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

Charitable Trust, Near Cine Park, Chanod, Vapi – 396195. [PAN: AAHHK 4703 R] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri HardikVora– AR िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee by Smt. Anupama Singla – Sr.DR राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue by सुनवाई क" तारीख/ Date of hearing: 20.10.2020 उ"ोषणा क" तारीख/Pronouncement on: 20.10.2020 आदेश /O R D E R PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICAL MEMEBR: 1. This

SIR P.T. SARVAJANIK COLLEGE OF SCIENCE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION,SURAT vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is also allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

35 (Guj.), (iii) Bargahe Husaini Trust-Monpar vs. CIT(E), 165 taxmann.com 141 (Ahd- Trib.), (iv) Shree Dandhavya Chhasath Prajapati Samaj vs. CIT(E), 167 taxmann.com 610 (Ahd – Trib.), (v) Ahmedabad Rana Caste Association vs. CIT(E), 82 ITR 704 (SC), (vi) Indus Alumni Association Indus University Campus vs. CIT(E), 168 taxmann.com 526 (Ahd – Trib

SIR P.T. SARVAJANIK COLLEGE OF SCIENCE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION,SURAT vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is also allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

35 (Guj.), (iii) Bargahe Husaini Trust-Monpar vs. CIT(E), 165 taxmann.com 141 (Ahd- Trib.), (iv) Shree Dandhavya Chhasath Prajapati Samaj vs. CIT(E), 167 taxmann.com 610 (Ahd – Trib.), (v) Ahmedabad Rana Caste Association vs. CIT(E), 82 ITR 704 (SC), (vi) Indus Alumni Association Indus University Campus vs. CIT(E), 168 taxmann.com 526 (Ahd – Trib

MOEEN MEMORIAL WELFARE TRUST,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGLORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.117/Srt/2021 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2015-16) (Virtual Court Hearing) Moeen Memorial Welfare Trust Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Cpc, Bangalore Sheri Street, Opp. Petrol Pump, Vs. Olpad, Surat-394540 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadtm 2052 P (Appellant ) (Respondent)

charitable activities and that is why the assessee got registration under section 12AA of the Act, hence such genuine trust should be encouraged and should not be penalized for technical mistake. Therefore, Ld. AR submits that assessee-trust has furnished petition for condonation of delay, and explained the delay is a reasonable way. Therefore, he prays the Bench that delay

SHREE KHEDUT SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD.,BARDOLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARDOLI

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijyananda Pruseth

10. The Id. AR also submitted that the fixation of the final cane price is not an arbitrary unilateral act but occurs under a regulatory umbrella involving the oversight or concurrence of statutory authorities such as the Director of Sugar, Gujarat State, and the Registrar and District Registrar of Co-operative Societies. The cane price is declared, approved and recorded