BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

49 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 10(34)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi457Mumbai416Chennai221Bangalore182Pune96Jaipur86Hyderabad83Kolkata59Surat49Ahmedabad45Lucknow44Chandigarh39Allahabad31Indore29Jodhpur23Visakhapatnam18Amritsar16Cochin15Panaji14Agra11Rajkot9SC8Nagpur8Raipur7Calcutta7Cuttack6Karnataka5Kerala5Dehradun3Rajasthan3Andhra Pradesh2Orissa2Patna2Punjab & Haryana1Guwahati1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Telangana1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 12A140Section 80G(5)63Section 12A(1)(ac)60Exemption41Section 80G32Charitable Trust27Section 80G(5)(iii)21Addition to Income16Section 11

NAVBHARAT CHERITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BHARUCH

In the result, all these three appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 27/SRT/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi Jhagadia, Bharuch, Ward-1, Vs. Gujarat, Pin-393115 Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 11Section 12ASection 13(10)Section 254(1)

10 for the A.Y. 2014-15." 28. Mr. Vora, the learned counsel is right in his submission that a fair and dispassionate view of the facts ought to have persuaded the respondent, who possesses wide discretion in the matter under section 119 of the Act, to condone the delay and allow the assessee to avail the said exemption under section

GANGADHARA SAHKARI KELVANI MANDAL,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

Showing 1–20 of 49 · Page 1 of 3

14
Condonation of Delay11
Section 253(3)10
Disallowance9

In the result, in the light of the above discussion, the appeal of the\nassessee is allowed

ITA 25/SRT/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 May 2025
For Appellant: \nMs. Dharti Jariwala, C.AFor Respondent: \nShri Mukesh Jain, CIT DR
Section 10(23)Section 80G

10) The clause of trust deed for which honourable CIT want explanation is as\nunder:\nEnglish translation of these clause is as follows:\nOur explanation for the clause is as under:\nThus, to have School, library, pathsala, Gymnasium is common in every school.\n(11) Trust get registration for Sec 80(G) in past with the same trust deed. Further

SHRI RAM EDUCATION & GRAMINVIKAS CHARITABLE TRUST,VALSAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTION WARD), SURAT

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 213/SRT/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Sainishri Ram Education & I.T.O., (Exemption Ward) Graminvikas Charitable Trust, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Jauagauri Park, Hathikhana, Majura Gate, Dharampur, Surat. Valsad-396050. Pan No. Aalts 324 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 10(23)(C)Section 11aSection 12ASection 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 254(1)

Charitable Trust Vs ITO 31/3/2012 at Rs. 5.00 lacs only, however, in the statement file before him it was shown 13,34,700/-. On the basis of such discrepancies, the Assessing Officer noted that the assessee has reported (received) fresh donation of Rs. 8,34,700 (13,34,700 – 5,00,000) during the A.Y. 2013-14 which

JAYSHRI GOPALLAL MAHARAJSHRINI SURAT SRUSTI TRUST,SURAT vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1238/SRT/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 May 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: of Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Jain, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 143(1)

charitable trust registered under section 12A, had substantially satisfied condition for availing benefit of exemption as a trust, it could not be denied exemption merely on bar of limitation in furnishing audit report in Form no. 10B. 7.5 In the case of CIT v. Gujarat Oil & Allied Industries [1993] 201 ITR 325 (Guj.), the High Court held that where

NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 384/SRT/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Feb 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 383, 384 & 385/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi, Jhagadia, Ward-1, Vs. Bharuch. Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 11Section 12ASection 13(10)Section 254(1)Section 80G

10 for the A.Y. 2014-15." 28. Mr. Vora, the learned counsel is right in his submission that a fair and dispassionate view of the facts ought to have persuaded the respondent, who possesses wide discretion in the matter under section 119 of the Act, to condone the delay and allow the assessee to avail the said exemption under section

NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 383/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Feb 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 383, 384 & 385/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi, Jhagadia, Ward-1, Vs. Bharuch. Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 11Section 12ASection 13(10)Section 254(1)Section 80G

10 for the A.Y. 2014-15." 28. Mr. Vora, the learned counsel is right in his submission that a fair and dispassionate view of the facts ought to have persuaded the respondent, who possesses wide discretion in the matter under section 119 of the Act, to condone the delay and allow the assessee to avail the said exemption under section

NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 385/SRT/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Feb 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 383, 384 & 385/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi, Jhagadia, Ward-1, Vs. Bharuch. Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 11Section 12ASection 13(10)Section 254(1)Section 80G

10 for the A.Y. 2014-15." 28. Mr. Vora, the learned counsel is right in his submission that a fair and dispassionate view of the facts ought to have persuaded the respondent, who possesses wide discretion in the matter under section 119 of the Act, to condone the delay and allow the assessee to avail the said exemption under section

SHREE BRAHMAJYOTI SANSKAR DHAM TRUST ,SURAT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTION) AHMEDABAD , AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 74/SRT/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 Oct 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.74/Srt/2025 Assessment Year: (2025-26) (Hybrid Hearing) Shree Brahmajyoti Sanskar Dham Trust, Vs. Cit (Exemption), 9, Gopal Krushna Society, Behind Arihant Ahmedabad Park, Ambika Niketan, Athwalines, Surat – 395007, Gujarat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aawts9225R (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Hiren Vepari, Ca Respondent By Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 19/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 31/10/2025

Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ii)Section 80G(5)(iii)

section 80G(5) of the Act was rejected and he also cancelled the provisional registration granted earlier. 4. Aggrieved by the order of CIT(E), the assessee filed appeal before the Tribunal. The learned Authorized Representative (ld. AR) of the assessee filed a paper book containing 130 pages, including copy of Form 10AC granting provisional registration u/s 12AB, copy

SHREE SUIGAM KHODADHOR PANJARA POLE,SURAT vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1278/SRT/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Apr 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Jain, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 143(1)Section 80Section 80G(5)

charitable trust registered under section 12A, had substantially satisfied condition for availing benefit of exemption as a trust, it could not be denied exemption merely on bar of limitation in furnishing audit report in Form no. 10B. 7.5 In the case of CIT v. Gujarat Oil & Allied Industries [1993] 201 ITR 325 (Guj.), the High Court held that where

SANSKRUTIK RAKSHA SAMITI,BAMROLI, SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1239/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat29 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1239/Srt/2024 (Physical Hearing) Sanskrutik Raksha Samiti, Vs. The Cit (Exemption), 350-351, Kashi Nagar Society, Udhna So, Ahmedabad Bamroli – 394210, Gujarat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Abats4036R4 (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Rasesh Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 19/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 29/04/2025

Section 80GSection 80G(5)

10. To reiterate, 'Explanation 3 does not require the ascertainment of whether the whole or substantially the whole of the institution or fund's charitable purpose is of a religious nature. If it did, it would read differently. It requires the ascertainment of whether there is one purpose within the institution or fund's overall charitable purpose which is wholly

SHRI VIDHYASAGAR SANT NIVAS TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

ITA 243/SRT/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Jul 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)

Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 2(15)Section 80G(5)

charitable in character for general public at large and for the purpose of granting registration under 12A of the Act, the provision of section 13(1)(b) cannot be referred to. Section 13(1)(b) is to be applied while granting exemption to the trust. In view above finding, we do not find any question of law much less

SHRI VIDHYASAGAR SANT NIVAS TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee in ITA No

ITA 242/SRT/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member), Shri Bijayananda Pruseth (Accountant Member)

Section 12ASection 13(1)Section 2(15)Section 80G(5)

charitable in character for general public at large and for the purpose of granting registration under 12A of the Act, the provision of section 13(1)(b) cannot be referred to. Section 13(1)(b) is to be applied while granting exemption to the trust. In view above finding, we do not find any question of law much less

AADIVASI SAMPSABHA CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee/applicant trust are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 18/SRT/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 May 2025

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: Respondent by: Shri Mukesh Jain, CIT DRFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Jain, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

Charitable Trust vs. CIT(E) Asst. Years –N.A. - 5– 9. We observe that since in the preceding paragraphs we have restored the matter regarding grant of registration under section 12A of the Act to the file of CIT (Exemptions), for de novo consideration, accordingly, it is directed that the application for grant of approval under section

AADIVASI SAMPSABHA CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION) , AHMEDABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee/applicant trust are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 16/SRT/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 May 2025

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: Respondent by: Shri Mukesh Jain, CIT DRFor Respondent: Shri Mukesh Jain, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

Charitable Trust vs. CIT(E) Asst. Years –N.A. - 5– 9. We observe that since in the preceding paragraphs we have restored the matter regarding grant of registration under section 12A of the Act to the file of CIT (Exemptions), for de novo consideration, accordingly, it is directed that the application for grant of approval under section

GOODWILL FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is also allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 426/SRT/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Surat11 Jun 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Ms Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.427 & 426/Srt/2025 (Assessment Years: 2024-25) (Hybrid Hearing) Goodwill Foundation Charitable Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Trust, Ahmedabad A 102, Sky Heaven Ved Gurukul Road Ved, Surat - 395004 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadtg9648P (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Harikrishna Gohil, Ar Respondent By Shri Mukesh Jain, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 09/06/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 11/06/2025

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 253(3)Section 80G(5)(iii)

10. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. ITA No.426/SRT/2024 (AY:2024-25): 11. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in ITA No.426/SRT/2024 are as follows: “(1) Applicant runs diagnostics center in Surat and does not have full time accountant for daily and weekly email checks. Consequently, due to oversight, applicant missed

GOODWILL FOUNATION CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is also allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 427/SRT/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Surat11 Jun 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Ms Suchitra Raghunath Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.427 & 426/Srt/2025 (Assessment Years: 2024-25) (Hybrid Hearing) Goodwill Foundation Charitable Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Trust, Ahmedabad A 102, Sky Heaven Ved Gurukul Road Ved, Surat - 395004 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadtg9648P (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Harikrishna Gohil, Ar Respondent By Shri Mukesh Jain, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 09/06/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 11/06/2025

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 253(3)Section 80G(5)(iii)

10. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. ITA No.426/SRT/2024 (AY:2024-25): 11. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in ITA No.426/SRT/2024 are as follows: “(1) Applicant runs diagnostics center in Surat and does not have full time accountant for daily and weekly email checks. Consequently, due to oversight, applicant missed

SHREE MAHAVIDEH CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 1248/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 May 2025

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1248/Srt/2024 (Physical Hearing) Shree Mahavideh Charitable Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Trust, Ahmedabad 0/B/4, Tribhuvan Complex, Ghod Dod Road, Surat - 395007 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Abdts9848Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

Section 80G of the Act afresh and to carry out necessary verification whether the assessee / applicant trust has expended / utilized less than 5% of its total income towards religious purposes. If that accordance with law.” 8. The facts of the present case are similar to the facts of the case cited supra. The ld. AR submitted that

SAWANI FOUNDATION TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 1276/SRT/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 May 2025

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1248/Srt/2024 (Physical Hearing) Shree Mahavideh Charitable Vs. The Cit(Exemption), Trust, Ahmedabad 0/B/4, Tribhuvan Complex, Ghod Dod Road, Surat - 395007 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Abdts9848Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent)

Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

Section 80G of the Act afresh and to carry out necessary verification whether the assessee / applicant trust has expended / utilized less than 5% of its total income towards religious purposes. If that accordance with law.” 8. The facts of the present case are similar to the facts of the case cited supra. The ld. AR submitted that

SETU PARIVAR CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(E), AHEMDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is also allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 696/SRT/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Oct 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.695 & 696/Srt/2025 Assessment Years: (2025-26) (Hybrid Hearing) Setu Parivar Charitable Trust, Vs. The Cit(Exemption), 1, Upper Ground Floor, Inoralok Ahmedabad Appartment, Bhatar, Surat – 395001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abdts8688J (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Bipin Jariwala, Advocate Respondent By Shri Mukesh Jain, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 08/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/10/2025

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)(iii)

10. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. ITA No.695/SRT/2025 (AY 2025-26): 11. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in ITA No.695/SRT/2024 are as follows: “1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well as the law on the subject, the learned Commissioner of the Income Tax (Exemption

SETU PARIVAR CHARITABLE TRUST,SURAT vs. CIT(E), AHEMDABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is also allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 695/SRT/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Oct 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.695 & 696/Srt/2025 Assessment Years: (2025-26) (Hybrid Hearing) Setu Parivar Charitable Trust, Vs. The Cit(Exemption), 1, Upper Ground Floor, Inoralok Ahmedabad Appartment, Bhatar, Surat – 395001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abdts8688J (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Bipin Jariwala, Advocate Respondent By Shri Mukesh Jain, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 08/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 30/10/2025

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)(iii)

10. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. ITA No.695/SRT/2025 (AY 2025-26): 11. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in ITA No.695/SRT/2024 are as follows: “1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well as the law on the subject, the learned Commissioner of the Income Tax (Exemption