Search: capital gains

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 920clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai167 Delhi80 Bangalore22 Jaipur17 Chennai16 Ahmedabad13 Indore13 Kolkata12 Hyderabad12 Lucknow12 Pune6 Ranchi6 Dehradun4 Nagpur3 Cochin3 Raipur2 Rajkot2 Jabalpur2 Patna2 Surat2 Chandigarh1 Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 40A(3)3 Section 143(3)2 Section 142(1)2 Addition to Income2

BHAVANABEN PRAVINCHANDRABHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(3)(6), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes in terms indicated above

ITA 71/SRT/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat15 Oct 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.71/Srt/2025 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Hybrid Hearing) Bhavnaben Pravinchandrabhai Income Tax Officer, बनाम/ Patel Ward-1(3)(6), Surat, 303, Vs. 16D/183/6 Shiv Shaki Bhavan, Income Tax Office, Anavil Opp. Rupli Chinema, Ram Business Centre, Adajan, Surat- Nagar, Rander Road, Surat-395 395 007 005 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Bgfpp 0968 N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

gain at Rs.7,79,184/- ignoring the fact that appellant land was rural agricultural land as such, it is not capital asset subject to Income tax. 2. Ld. CIT(A), NFAC has erred in law and on fact to confirm AO’s addition on account of LTCG that worked out by the AO by taking 50C value and that

BHAVANABEN PRAVINCHANDRABHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(3)(6), SURAT

BHAVANABEN PRAVINCHANDRABHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(3)(6), SURAT

MURTUJA HUSAINBHAI HIRANI,NA vs. ARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3, , NAVSARI