VINODCHANDRA MADHABHAI LAVRI,SURAT vs. ITO,WARD 2(3)(4), SURAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

Section 143(2) calling for details in respect of computation of Long Term Capital Gain on sale of immovable property. Since the assessee has not replied to the notices, a final show-cause notice was issued that was also not replied by the assessee, which has resulted in passing the ex- ITA Nos.149 to 151/Srt/2025 Vinodchandra Madhabhai Lavri

VINODCHANDRA MADHABHAI LAVRI,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(3)(4), SURAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

Section 143(2) calling for details in respect of computation of Long Term Capital Gain on sale of immovable property. Since the assessee has not replied to the notices, a final show-cause notice was issued that was also not replied by the assessee, which has resulted in passing the ex- ITA Nos.149 to 151/Srt/2025 Vinodchandra Madhabhai Lavri

VINODCHANDRA MADHABHAI LAVRI,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(3)(4), SURAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

Section 143(2) calling for details in respect of computation of Long Term Capital Gain on sale of immovable property. Since the assessee has not replied to the notices, a final show-cause notice was issued that was also not replied by the assessee, which has resulted in passing the ex- ITA Nos.149 to 151/Srt/2025 Vinodchandra Madhabhai Lavri

SANJAYBHAI ARJUNBHAI PATEL,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, SURAT

gain on\nfluctuation in price/ value. Thus, the assessee earned income from referral,\ninterest income from lending of coins and from staking. DKD cons were operated\nin pseudonymous ownership without any physical address. It functioned as\nscheme with lending and escrows. All such details were found from the personal\nLaptop of assessee \"Snjay_hp_laptop_320_gb-“, which was seized

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1, SURAT vs. SHRI SANJAYBHAI ARJUNBHAI PATEL, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and the cross appeal of\nthe assessee is partly allowed

gain on\nfluctuation in price/ value. Thus, the assessee earned income from referral,\ninterest income from lending of coins and from staking. DKD cons were operated\nin pseudonymous ownership without any physical address. It functioned as\nscheme with lending and escrows. All such details were found from the personal\nLaptop of assessee \"Snjay_hp_laptop_320_gb\", which was seized