Search: capital gains

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 43Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka51 Mumbai48 Ahmedabad37 Delhi26 Bangalore15 Hyderabad8 Chennai7 Kolkata6 Cochin4 SC4 Jaipur3 Cuttack2 Visakhapatnam2 Surat2 Pune2 Jodhpur1 Indore1 Patna1 Rajkot1 Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 44A4 Section 403 Section 143(3)2 Section 194A2 Deduction2

SHRI BIPINCHANDRA HIRALAL THAKKAR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(6),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2126/AHD/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Oct 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.2126/Ahd/2016 ("नधा"रणवष" / Ay.: (2013-14) Shri Bipinchandra Hiralal Thakkar, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Plot No.60/61, Hari Ichha Society, Ward-1(2)6, Surat. Udhna Bhestan Road, Surat-394210. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aawpt1432D (Assessee) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah- CAFor Respondent: Miss Anupama Singla – Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 194ASection 40Section 44A

gains of business or profession". It only means that the deduction allowable u/s 28 to 43C is deemed to have been already granted to the assessee. This is because the said provision u/s 28 to 43C are provision relating to the computation of business income of the assessee. However, a perusal of the provision of sec. 40(a)(ia) shows

SHRI BIPINCHANDRA HIRALAL THAKKAR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(6),, SURAT

SHRI BIPINCHANDRA HIRALAL THAKKAR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(6),, SURAT

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXAMPTION) WARD, SURAT vs. SHREE SAIBABA SATSANG MANDAL, SURAT