KHAREL VIBHAG V. V. K.S. M. LIMITED,NA vs. ARIVS.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, NAVSARI
In the result, appeals filed by the assessees (In ITA No
ITA 201/SRT/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat07 Sept 2021AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.173/Srt/2017 & 199/Srt/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2013-14 & 2014-15) (Virtual Court Hearing) M/S.Maroli Bazar Vibhag Vividh Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ks.M.L. Ward-2, Navsari. At & Post – Maroli Bazar, Tal-Jalalpore, Dist-Navsari. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaaam 1095 J (Assessee) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.200/Srt/2018 & 201/Srt/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2013-14 & 2014-15) (Virtual Court Hearing) Kharel Vibhag V.V.K.S.M. Ltd., Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income At & Post – Kharel, Tax, Navsari. Navsari. & The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, Navsari.
For Appellant: Shri Parmil Sinh Parmar - ARFor Respondent: Ms. Anupama Singla – Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)
41. Therefore, in the first instance the income of the assessee under section 28 is required to be computed in accordance with the provisions of section 29 of the Act. Section 29 provides that the income referred to in section 28 shall be computed in accordance with the provisions contained in sections 30 to 43A.
Sections 30 to 36 provide