Search: capital gains

8 results for “capital gains”+ Section 271Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur14 Ahmedabad14 Mumbai12 Amritsar10 Bangalore9 Surat8 Delhi6 Lucknow6 Pune5 Cuttack4 Indore3 Hyderabad2 Chandigarh2 Visakhapatnam1 Jodhpur1 Patna1 Raipur1 Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 14412 Section 14712 Section 271(1)(b)11 Section 25010 Addition to Income8 Section 271(1)(c)7 Section 271F7 Penalty7 Section 1486 Reopening of Assessment

KANTILAL DAYALBHAI RAMBHAI ,SURAT vs. ITO(INT. TAX), SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 928/SRT/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Section 250Section 253(3)Section 45

section 50C of the Act. The AO\nissued show cause notice on 02.03.2022, which is at page 3 to 4 of the\nassessment order. The AO found that the assessee had sold immovable\nproperty (land) along with four co-owners. The assessee has failed to disclose\nthe long-term capital gain (LTCG) income and has not offered any income

KRISTINA NATHABHAI KRICHCHAN,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3), SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 349/SRT/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat

KANTILAL DAYALBHAI RAMBHAI ,SURAT vs. ITO(INT. TAX), SURAT

KRISTINA NATHABHAI KRICHCHAN,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3), SURAT

KANTILAL DAYALBHAI RAMBHAI ,SURAT vs. ITO(INT. TAX), SURAT

KRISTINA NATHABHAI KRICHCHAN,SURAT vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3), SURAT

GAURAVKUMAR MANILAL PATEL,TAPI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2)(7), SURAT

GAURAVKUMAR MANILAL PATEL,TAPI vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(6), SURAT

GAURAVKUMAR MANILAL PATEL,TAPI vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(7), SURAT

GAURAVKUMAR MANILAL PATEL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(7), SURAT

GAURAVKUMAR MANILAL PATEL,TAPI vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(7), SURAT

GAURAVKUMAR MANILAL PATEL,TAPI vs. ITO, WARD 3(2)(6), SURAT