Search: capital gains

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 271D(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur15 Hyderabad14 Visakhapatnam12 Delhi8 Chennai7 Kolkata6 Ahmedabad5 Bangalore5 Indore4 Agra3 Nagpur2 Surat2 Pune2 Rajkot1 Cuttack1 Chandigarh1 Mumbai1 Patna1

Key Topics

Section 271D10 Section 69C4 Section 254(1)2 Section 143(3)2 Section 692 Section 271(1)(c)2 Section 269S2 Unexplained Investment2 Penalty2 Addition to Income

PRAVINBHAI KESHAVBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE 1(3), SURAT, SURAT

In the result, ground of appeal raised by the assessee is allowed

ITA 301/SRT/2022[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Surat03 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Virtual Hearing) Shri Pravinbhai Keshavbhai Patel, Addl.C.I.T.,Range-1(3), A/2, Golden Park Society, Surat Vs. Opp. Prime Arcade, Aanand Mahal Road, Adajan, Surat. Pan No. Adgpp 4549 L Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Smt. Pravinaben Pravinbhai Patel, Addl.C.I.T.,Range-1(3), A/2, Golden Park Society, Surat Vs. Opp. Prime Arcade, Aanand Mahal Road, Adajan, Surat. Pan No. Cdopp 3300 D Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 269SSection 271(1)(c)Section 271DSection 69Section 69C

2,51,190/-. The case was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed under Section 143(3) of the Act on 29/11/2017. The Assessing Officer during the assessment noted that the assessee has purchased agricultural land for a consideration of Rs. 1.29 crore with other nine persons (co-owners). The assessee has paid an amount

PRAVINBHAI KESHAVBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE 1(3), SURAT, SURAT

PRAVINBHAI KESHAVBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. ADDL. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE 1(3), SURAT, SURAT

PRAVINABEN PRAVINBHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. ADD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE 1(3), SURAT, SURAT