Search: capital gains

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 234Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai239 Delhi204 Bangalore148 Ahmedabad70 Kolkata31 Jaipur28 Hyderabad26 Chandigarh20 Chennai19 Raipur17 Guwahati10 Pune9 Cochin8 Indore7 Rajkot7 Karnataka4 Surat4 Telangana3 Jodhpur3 Cuttack3 Nagpur2 Ranchi1 Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 26329 Section 54F8 Section 143(3)5 Section 545 Section 254(1)2 Section 234A2 Survey u/s 133A2 Deduction2

SMT. MINAXIBEN HARSHADBHAI MAVANI,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(3),, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2604/AHD/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat14 Sept 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) Smt. Minaxiben Harshadbhai The Income Tax Officer, Mavani, Ward-1(3)(3), Surat. Vs. 204, Malhar Complex, Icchanath, Surat – 395 007. Pan: Agjpm 8034 B Applicant Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 254(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 54Section 54F

capital gain be taxed in the year in which period of 3 years to sale is completed. It be so held now. 6. Levy of interest u/s 234A/234B/234C & 234D of the Act is not justified. 7. Initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is not justified.” 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee

SMT. MINAXIBEN HARSHADBHAI MAVANI,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(3),, SURAT

SMT. MINAXIBEN HARSHADBHAI MAVANI,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(3),, SURAT

SHUSHILABEN PRATAPBHAI THAKOR,NA vs. ARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 5, NAVSARI

HOTEL ROYAL GARDEN,,DAMAN AND DIU (UT) vs. THE PCIT, VALSAD, VALSAD

MR. RAMANLAL RAGHABHI PATEL ,DAMAN vs. THE PCIT, VALSAD, VALSAD