Search: capital gains

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 234Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 26329 Section 54F7 Section 143(3)4 Section 234A3 Section 254(1)2 Section 55A2 Survey u/s 133A2 Deduction2 Addition to Income2

LATE MANISHBHAI NAGINDAS GAJJAR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(3),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for in ITA

ITA 1335/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Dec 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.1335/Ahd/2016 िनधा"रण वष"/A.Y.:2011-12 Late Manishbhai Nagindas Gajjar Vs. Income Tax Officer, Through L/H Illaben Manishbhai Ward- 6(3) Surat Gajjar, 316Kh Luhar Mohhallo , Palgam, Chaurasi Surat 359009 Pan: Aovpg 1860K अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 143Section 55A

capital gains under section 54G of the Act. Therefore, on same analogy, the amount utilized for investment in land would be eligible for deduction under L/h Late Manishbhai Gajjar Smt.Ilaben Manishbhai v. ITO-WD-6(3) Surat /I.T.A. No.1335 & 1336/Ahd/2016/A.Y:11-12 Page 15 of 17 section 54B of the Act. Further, the Co-ordinate Bench of Pune Tribunal

DHANSUKHLAL RAMANBHAI MALI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD2(3)(1), SURAT

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only

LATE MANISHBHAI NAGINDAS GAJJAR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(3),, SURAT

DHANSUKHLAL RAMANBHAI MALI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD2(3)(1), SURAT

LATE MANISHBHAI NAGINDAS GAJJAR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(3),, SURAT

DHANSUKHLAL RAMANBHAI MALI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD2(3)(1), SURAT

SHUSHILABEN PRATAPBHAI THAKOR,NA vs. ARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 5, NAVSARI

HOTEL ROYAL GARDEN,,DAMAN AND DIU (UT) vs. THE PCIT, VALSAD, VALSAD

MR. RAMANLAL RAGHABHI PATEL ,DAMAN vs. THE PCIT, VALSAD, VALSAD