DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1) (1),, SURAT vs. ANUSHREE SAREES PVT. LTD.,, SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue ( In ITA No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1680 To 1682/Ahd/2017 आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.61/Srt/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2011-12 To 2013-14) (Virtual Court Hearing) The Dcit, Circle-1(1)(1), Vs. M/S. Anushree Sarees Pvt. Ltd., Surat. D-5409, Raghukul Textile Market, Ring Road, Surat-395001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aagca5772J (Appellant)/(Revenue) (Respondent)/(Assessee)

Unexplained Share Application Money u/s 68 of the Act 2,20,00,000 2. Bogus Job Work Expenses to concerns of Shri. Navin C. 1,25,53,893 Rangrej 3. Bogus Job Work Expenses to concerns of Rawalwasiya 3,06,530 Group 4. Bogus Purchases from Rawalwasiya Filaments Pvt. Ltd. 2,13,12,685 5. Untraceable Job Work Parties

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1) (1),, SURAT vs. ANUSHREE SAREES PVT. LTD.,, SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue ( In ITA No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1680 To 1682/Ahd/2017 आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.61/Srt/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2011-12 To 2013-14) (Virtual Court Hearing) The Dcit, Circle-1(1)(1), Vs. M/S. Anushree Sarees Pvt. Ltd., Surat. D-5409, Raghukul Textile Market, Ring Road, Surat-395001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aagca5772J (Appellant)/(Revenue) (Respondent)/(Assessee)

Unexplained Share Application Money u/s 68 of the Act 2,20,00,000 2. Bogus Job Work Expenses to concerns of Shri. Navin C. 1,25,53,893 Rangrej 3. Bogus Job Work Expenses to concerns of Rawalwasiya 3,06,530 Group 4. Bogus Purchases from Rawalwasiya Filaments Pvt. Ltd. 2,13,12,685 5. Untraceable Job Work Parties

DY. C.I.T.CIR., 1(1)(1), SURAT vs. M/S ANUSHREE SAREES PVT.LTD.,, SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue ( In ITA No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.1680 To 1682/Ahd/2017 आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.61/Srt/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2011-12 To 2013-14) (Virtual Court Hearing) The Dcit, Circle-1(1)(1), Vs. M/S. Anushree Sarees Pvt. Ltd., Surat. D-5409, Raghukul Textile Market, Ring Road, Surat-395001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aagca5772J (Appellant)/(Revenue) (Respondent)/(Assessee)

Unexplained Share Application Money u/s 68 of the Act 2,20,00,000 2. Bogus Job Work Expenses to concerns of Shri. Navin C. 1,25,53,893 Rangrej 3. Bogus Job Work Expenses to concerns of Rawalwasiya 3,06,530 Group 4. Bogus Purchases from Rawalwasiya Filaments Pvt. Ltd. 2,13,12,685 5. Untraceable Job Work Parties

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(3)(6), SURAT vs. SHRI ABHISHEK NAVNITKUMAR DOSHI, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 21/Srt/2022 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Physical Court Hearing) Abhishek Navnitkumar Doshi, Vs. The Ito, Ward-2(3)(7), 204/205, 2Nd Floor, 6/1911-12, Surat. Jin Shanti Building, Jada Khadi, Mahidharpura – 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Afhpd0064M (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.38/Srt/2022 Assessment Year: (2012-13) The Ito, Ward-2(3)(6), Vs. Abhishek Navnitkumar Doshi, 204/205, 2Nd Floor, 6/1911-12, Surat. Jin Shanti Building, Jada Khadi, Mahidharpura – 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Afhpd0064M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Sapnesh Sheth, Ca Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 28/12/2022 09/01/2023 Date Of Pronouncement

unexplained peak credit in respect of bogus purchases. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and various judicial precedents on the issue involved, I direct the AO to restrict the disallowance to 25% of the total purchase value of Rs.2,50,25,283/-. The appellant gets partial relief on this account. The ground no. 2 raised

ABHISHEK NAVNITKUMAR DOSHI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WD. 2(3)(7), SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 21/Srt/2022 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Physical Court Hearing) Abhishek Navnitkumar Doshi, Vs. The Ito, Ward-2(3)(7), 204/205, 2Nd Floor, 6/1911-12, Surat. Jin Shanti Building, Jada Khadi, Mahidharpura – 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Afhpd0064M (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.38/Srt/2022 Assessment Year: (2012-13) The Ito, Ward-2(3)(6), Vs. Abhishek Navnitkumar Doshi, 204/205, 2Nd Floor, 6/1911-12, Surat. Jin Shanti Building, Jada Khadi, Mahidharpura – 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Afhpd0064M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Sapnesh Sheth, Ca Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 28/12/2022 09/01/2023 Date Of Pronouncement

unexplained peak credit in respect of bogus purchases. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and various judicial precedents on the issue involved, I direct the AO to restrict the disallowance to 25% of the total purchase value of Rs.2,50,25,283/-. The appellant gets partial relief on this account. The ground no. 2 raised

DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), SURAT vs. DIVA DIAMONDS PVT. LTD, SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shripawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.128/Srt/2020 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2014-15) (Virtual Court Hearing) Deputy Commissioner Of Diva Diamonds Pvt.Ltd., Income-Tax, Circle-1(1)(1), 302, Gokul Building, Vs. Mahidharpura, Pipla Sherry, 1St Room No.108, Floor, Surat-395007 Aayakar Bhavan, Majura Gate, Surat-395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadcd 1389 H (Appellant) (Respondent) Cross Objection No.13/Srt/2020 [Arising In Ita No.128/Srt/2020] ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2014-15) Diva Diamonds Pvt.Ltd., Deputy Commissioner Of 302, Gokul Building, Income-Tax, Circle-1(1)(1), Vs. Mahidharpura, Pipla Sherry, 1St Room No.108, Floor, Surat-395007 Aayakar Bhavan, Majura Gate, Surat-395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadcd 1389 H (Applicant) (Respondent) आयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.313/Srt/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2014-15) Diva Diamonds Pvt. Ltd., Principal Cit-1,Surat 1St 302, Gokul Building, Room No.123, Floor, Vs. Mahidharpura, Pipla Sherry, Aayakar Bhavan, Majura Surat-395007 Gate, Surat-395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadcd 1389 H (Appellant) (Respondent)

Investments Pvt. Ltd. TTANO. 1297 OF 2015 (Bombay High Court) 5 ShilpiJewellers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India &Ors. WRIT PETITION NO. 3540 OF 2018 (Bombay High Court) 6 CIT in Vs. Mohmed Juned Dadani 355 ITR 172 (Gujarat) 7 Micro Inks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT [2017] 79 taxmann.com 153 (Gujarat) 8 Shakti Karnawat Vs. ITO - 2(3)(8), Surat

DIVA DIAMONDS PVT. LTD,SURAT vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shripawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.128/Srt/2020 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2014-15) (Virtual Court Hearing) Deputy Commissioner Of Diva Diamonds Pvt.Ltd., Income-Tax, Circle-1(1)(1), 302, Gokul Building, Vs. Mahidharpura, Pipla Sherry, 1St Room No.108, Floor, Surat-395007 Aayakar Bhavan, Majura Gate, Surat-395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadcd 1389 H (Appellant) (Respondent) Cross Objection No.13/Srt/2020 [Arising In Ita No.128/Srt/2020] ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2014-15) Diva Diamonds Pvt.Ltd., Deputy Commissioner Of 302, Gokul Building, Income-Tax, Circle-1(1)(1), Vs. Mahidharpura, Pipla Sherry, 1St Room No.108, Floor, Surat-395007 Aayakar Bhavan, Majura Gate, Surat-395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadcd 1389 H (Applicant) (Respondent) आयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.313/Srt/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2014-15) Diva Diamonds Pvt. Ltd., Principal Cit-1,Surat 1St 302, Gokul Building, Room No.123, Floor, Vs. Mahidharpura, Pipla Sherry, Aayakar Bhavan, Majura Surat-395007 Gate, Surat-395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadcd 1389 H (Appellant) (Respondent)

Investments Pvt. Ltd. TTANO. 1297 OF 2015 (Bombay High Court) 5 ShilpiJewellers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India &Ors. WRIT PETITION NO. 3540 OF 2018 (Bombay High Court) 6 CIT in Vs. Mohmed Juned Dadani 355 ITR 172 (Gujarat) 7 Micro Inks Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT [2017] 79 taxmann.com 153 (Gujarat) 8 Shakti Karnawat Vs. ITO - 2(3)(8), Surat

LATE SHRI BHIMSEN DARBARILAL ARORA,,SURAT vs. THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5,, SURAT

In the result, ground no.4 raised by assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1706/Ahd/2016 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2010-11) (Physical Court Hearing) Bhimsen Darbarilal Arora Through, Vs. The Acit, Circle-5, L/H. Rajat Bhimsen Arora, Surat. Smt. Mamta Bhimsen Arora, A-201, Madhulika Apartment, Bhatar Road, Surat. (Appellant) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Acaps9230L

investment made in stock. 8. It is also important to note here that copy of general stock register was furnished with written submission dated 10.12.2012. This submission was made without taking into consideration of inventory of stock and statement recorded. For variation of value in inventory/statement and general stock register a show cause notice was issued on 04.03.2013. When assessee

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR.-2,, SURAT vs. SHRI RAMESHBHAI RAGHAVBHAI BHADANI, SURAT

In the result, summarized and concise ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./It(Ss)A Nos.25 &31/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Virtual Court Hearing) Deputy Commissioner Of Rameshbhai Raghavbhai Bhadani, Prop. Of M/S Rangeela Fashion, 14, Income-Tax, Central Circle-2, Room No. 505, 5Th Floor, Nirman Industrial Estate, A.K. Road, Fulpada, Surat Aaykar Bhawan, Majura Gate, Vs. Surat-395001. Deputy Commissioner Of Income- Rameshbai Raghavhai Bhadani Plot No.14-16, Nirman Tax, Central Circle-2, Room No.505, 5Th Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, Majura Industrial Estate, A./K. Road, Surat-395008 Gate, Surat-395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Adkpb 0556 F (Assessee) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.45/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2014-15) Deputy Commissioner Of Shri Rameshbhai Raghavbhai Income-Tax, Circle-3, Room No. Bhadani, Prop. Of M/S Rangeela Vs. 505, 5Th Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, Fashion, 14, Nirman Industrial Majura Gate, Surat-395001. Estate, A.K. Road, Fulpada, Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Adkpb 0556 F (Assessee) (Respondent)

investment in land at Naginawadi, Katargam as made by the Assessing officer in the hands of the appellant was deleted by ld CIT(A). We have gone through the above findings of ld CIT(A) and noted that there is no infirmity in the order of ld CIT(A), therefore, we confirm the findings

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, SURAT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, MAJURA GATE, SURAT vs. ROYAL DEVELOPERS, NR. IP MISSION SCHOOL, MUGLISA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

UNEXPLAINED INVESTMENT in PROPERTY. She had disregarded the submission of the assessee regarding purchase of the property in earlier years i.e. 2010 to 2013. The recital in the documents registered as above with regard to the payments received and the possession has also been brushed aside by her. The Ld Assessing Officer had at the end of para 6 (Bold

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(2),, SURAT vs. SHANTAI EXIM LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, ITA.No.436/SRT/2018 of the Department is dismissed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Meena

unexplained purchases. The assessee company filed return of income of Rs.97,09,650/-. During the year under consideration, the assessee company was engaged in the business of Trading, Manufacturing and Export of Fabrics. A survey under section 133A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 was conducted on the assessee company on 11th July, 2011 at business premises of the assessee

SHANTAI EXIM LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(2),, SURAT

In the result, ITA.No.436/SRT/2018 of the Department is dismissed

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Meena

unexplained purchases. The assessee company filed return of income of Rs.97,09,650/-. During the year under consideration, the assessee company was engaged in the business of Trading, Manufacturing and Export of Fabrics. A survey under section 133A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 was conducted on the assessee company on 11th July, 2011 at business premises of the assessee

SHRI SUDEEP MAHENDRABHAI SHAH,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD1(3)(5),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meena

investment made from the funding of such companies, which are bogus, the AO has rightly assumed the jurisdiction of initiating the reassessment proceedings. AO, on the basis of information subsequently having come to his knowledge, recognized untruthfulness of the facts furnished earlier. In the present case, since both the necessary conditions to reopen the assessment have been duly fulfilled, sufficiency

DINESH T GUPTA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-2(3)(7), SURAT

In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.440/Srt/2019 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2008-09) (Virtual Court Hearing) Dinesh T Gupta Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(7), Room No. 620, No.6/2037, Papadwala Building Vs. Aaykar Bhawan, Majura Gate, Surat- Bhojabhai Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, 395001 Surat-395003 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Airpg 8408 P (Appellant ) (Respondent)

unexplained purchases. During the year under consideration, the assessee has shown income from trading of diamond in the name & style of M/s Max India Diamond, Prop: Shri Dinesh T Gupta and various proceedings sheet entries have furnished and relevant details which were verified and kept on record. The assessee has furnished details of parties from whom diamonds have been purchased

ITO, WARD-2(3)(7), SURAT vs. DINESH T GUPTA, SURAT

In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.440/Srt/2019 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2008-09) (Virtual Court Hearing) Dinesh T Gupta Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(7), Room No. 620, No.6/2037, Papadwala Building Vs. Aaykar Bhawan, Majura Gate, Surat- Bhojabhai Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, 395001 Surat-395003 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Airpg 8408 P (Appellant ) (Respondent)

unexplained purchases. During the year under consideration, the assessee has shown income from trading of diamond in the name & style of M/s Max India Diamond, Prop: Shri Dinesh T Gupta and various proceedings sheet entries have furnished and relevant details which were verified and kept on record. The assessee has furnished details of parties from whom diamonds have been purchased

DINESH T GUPTA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-2(3)(7), SURAT

In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.440/Srt/2019 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2008-09) (Virtual Court Hearing) Dinesh T Gupta Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(3)(7), Room No. 620, No.6/2037, Papadwala Building Vs. Aaykar Bhawan, Majura Gate, Surat- Bhojabhai Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, 395001 Surat-395003 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Airpg 8408 P (Appellant ) (Respondent)

unexplained purchases. During the year under consideration, the assessee has shown income from trading of diamond in the name & style of M/s Max India Diamond, Prop: Shri Dinesh T Gupta and various proceedings sheet entries have furnished and relevant details which were verified and kept on record. The assessee has furnished details of parties from whom diamonds have been purchased

CHANDULAL A.SHAH(HUF),SURAT vs. THE ITO, WARD-3(3)(1),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee, Ind for A

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं././././I.T.A Nos.83 & 84/Srt/2017 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2000-01 & 2004-05 1.Chandulal Amrutlal Shah (Huf), V. Income Tax Officer, Bunglow No.74, Saifee Society, Ward-3(3)(1), Surat. L.H. Road, Surat-395 006. [Pan: Aaahc 8116 R] 2.Chandulal Amrutlal Shah, V. Income Tax Officer, Bunglow No.74, Saifee Society, Ward-3(3)(1), Surat. L.H. Road, Surat-395 006. [Pan: Adaps 5844 F] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""थ"/Respondent

bogus capital entry and assets, without any actual transaction has taken place. Therefore, the addition, if any, can be made any respective of one balance sheet for the same period, therefore, the addition of Rs.64,806/- is confirmed and the other addition on amount of Rs.67,535/- is deleted. This ground of appeal is partly allowed. 14. Ground No.2 relates

SMT. HEMANGINIBEN B. PATEL,SURAT vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in in ITA No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.576/Srt/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2014-15) (Virtual Court Hearing) Smt.Hemanginiben B Patel, V The Deputy Commissioner Of 28, Sangam Society, Parle Point, Surat. Income Tax, Circle-3, Surat. S. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Afipp 2238 Q (Assessee) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.577/Srt/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2014-15) Smt. Bhavnaben Arvindbhai Patel, V The Deputy Commissioner Of 27, Adarshnagar Society, Ambatalawadi S. Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Katargam, Surat – 395004. Surat. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Ablpp 4358 M (Assessee) (Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.578/Srt/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2014-15) Smt. Ritaben Niravbhai Patel, V The Deputy Commissioner Of 1003-1004, Santvan Heights, S. Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Laxmikant Ashram Road, Katargam, Surat. Surat – 395004. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Alxpp 0357 M (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Vartik Choksi - Ca Respondent By : Ms.Anupama Singla – Sr.Dr सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 07/07/2021 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30/07/2021 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A. L. Saini: Captioned Three Appeals Filed By Different Assessees, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2014-15, Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [Ld. Cit(A)], Which In Turn Arise Out Of Separate Penalty Order & Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Under

unexplained investment. Therefore, the addition of Rs. 3,48,771/- sustained by the CIT (A) is therefore, directed to be deleted. Thus, sole grounds of appeal is allowed.” 6. It is abundantly clear from the above order of the Tribunal that quantum addition of Rs.3,48,771/- has been deleted, therefore, the penalty relating to said quantum addition, being investment