BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai50Delhi19Raipur13Rajkot10Bangalore10Hyderabad10Kolkata7Jaipur6Indore3Lucknow3Visakhapatnam3Chennai2Chandigarh2Surat2Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 254(1)2Section 1472Section 1482Addition to Income2Limitation/Time-bar2Condonation of Delay2

OM SAI STONE LIMITED,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 2(1)(4), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 666/SRT/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)

bogus entry. The assessee submitted that the share issued to Aditi Exports and Vrajendra Thakkar are incorrect. The assessee also demanded satisfactory note issued by Pr.CIT. The ld. AR of the assessee further submits that the Assessing Officer without disposing of the objection of assessee, proceeded for reassessment. The Assessing Officer recorded that objection of assessee dated 11/10/2018 was disposed

OM SAI STONE LIMITED,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(1)(4), SURAT

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 667/SRT/2023[2012-13]Status: Disposed
ITAT Surat
27 Dec 2023
AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

Section 147Section 148Section 254(1)

bogus entry. The assessee submitted that the share issued to Aditi Exports and Vrajendra Thakkar are incorrect. The assessee also demanded satisfactory note issued by Pr.CIT. The ld. AR of the assessee further submits that the Assessing Officer without disposing of the objection of assessee, proceeded for reassessment. The Assessing Officer recorded that objection of assessee dated 11/10/2018 was disposed