BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 148A(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai138Delhi56Jaipur42Kolkata38Rajkot32Chandigarh23Hyderabad18Ahmedabad15Raipur11Chennai9Surat8Visakhapatnam8Agra6Pune4Indore2Bangalore2Jabalpur2Nagpur1Patna1Dehradun1Cuttack1Amritsar1Jodhpur1Lucknow1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 148A18Section 14816Section 14715Addition to Income8Section 2504Section 69C3Section 69A3Section 149A2Section 692Penalty

INCOME TAX OFFICER, ANAVIL BUSINESS CENTRE, ADAJAN vs. ABHISHEK NAVNIT DOSHI , MAHIDHARPURA

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed for In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 502/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Assessment Year: 2014-2015 Ito, Abhishek Navnit Doshi, 405, Income Tax Office, Anavil 204/205, 2Nd Floor, 6/1911-12, Business Centre, Hazira Road, Vs. Jin Shanti Bldg. Mahidharpura, Adajan, Surat-395003. Surat-395009. Pan No. Afhpd 0064 M Appellant Respondent

For Respondent: Mr. Sapnesh Sheth, Advocate

148A(d) was passed on 29.07.2022, followed by the issuance of notice under section 148 on 29.07.2022, followed by the issuance of notice under section 148 on 29.07.2022, followed by the issuance of notice under section 148 on the same date. 2.2 During the reassessment proceedings, the assessee furnished During the reassessment proceedings, the assessee furnished During the reassessment proceedings

VIVEK KHABIA,SURAT vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, ground No. 3 is allowed and ground No

2
Business Income2
Bogus Purchases2
ITA 1072/SRT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat05 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 1072/Srt/2024 (Ay 2018-19) (Physical Court Hearing) Vivek Khabia Income Tax Officer, Ward- H.No.1187-90-91, 1089, Office 2(3)(4), Surat, Aaykar Bhavan, बनाम No.411, New Dtc Gheekanta Majura Gate, Surat-395 001 Vs Road, Nr. Bhavani Vad Temple, Haripura, Surat-395 003 [Pan : Avspk 5724 E] अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ" /Respondent

Section 133(6)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151ASection 254(1)Section 28

bogus purchase and sales transaction. The assessee has not declared sales and purchase transactions correctly in the return of income and that not comply with show cause notice under section 148A(b). As notice under section 148A(b) was not complied. The case of assessee was reopened under section 147 of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) concluded that

JAYVADAN RUGHNATHWALA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD-1(2)(1), SURAT

ITA 923/SRT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat29 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth Assessment Year 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Uke, Sr.D.R
Section 115BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 69C

1,11,386/- was made till date even after passage of five years of time an amount of Rs. 13,73,766/- was mentioned outstanding. The Assessing Officer suspected that the full payments has not been made till date even when no regular business is done by the assessee without M/s. S.K. Enterprises and therefore held that these purchases

KALAMANDIR JEWELLERS LIMITED,SURAT vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1(1)(1), SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1012/SRT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Jan 2025AY 2018-19
Section 133ASection 139Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250Section 270A(9)Section 37

d) of the Act\nand copy of submission made before CIT(A). He also submitted that all the\ndocuments were furnished before AO as well as CIT(A). It was submitted that\nassessee had in fact purchased jewellery of Rs.10,87,012/- from M/s Om\nJewellers on 21.02.2018 and same was duly recorded in stock register and the\nbooks

DEEPESH VISHNU AGARWAL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 168/SRT/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Oct 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.168/Srt/2025 Assessment Years: 2019-20 (Hybrid Hearing) Depesh Vishnu Agarwal Income Tax Officer, Ward- बनाम/ A-301, Surya Plaza, U.M. 1(2),(1), Surat (Old Ward- Vs. Road, Surat-395 007 1(2)(6), Surat) Aaykar Bhavan, Majura Gate, Surat- 395 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aispa2948 P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.122/Srt/2025 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Income Tax Officer, Ward- Depesh Vishnu Agarwal बनाम/ 1(2),(1), Surat (Old Ward- A-301, Surya Plaza, U.M. Vs. 1(2)(6), Surat) Aaykar Road, Surat-395 007 Bhavan, Majura Gate, Surat- 395 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aispa 2948 P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri Manish Malpani, Ca राज" की ओर से /Revenue By Shri Ajay Uke, Sr-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 30/07/2025 उद्घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 27/10/2025

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149ASection 250Section 69Section 69C

1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well as in law, the ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi [CIT(A)] has erred in upholding the validity of the notice issued u/s 148A(b) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (the Act); the order passed u/s 148A(d) of the Act and the notice issued

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2)(1), SURAT, SURAT vs. DEEPESH VISHNU AGARWAL, SURAT

In the result, appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 122/SRT/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 Oct 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.168/Srt/2025 Assessment Years: 2019-20 (Hybrid Hearing) Depesh Vishnu Agarwal Income Tax Officer, Ward- बनाम/ A-301, Surya Plaza, U.M. 1(2),(1), Surat (Old Ward- Vs. Road, Surat-395 007 1(2)(6), Surat) Aaykar Bhavan, Majura Gate, Surat- 395 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aispa2948 P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.122/Srt/2025 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Income Tax Officer, Ward- Depesh Vishnu Agarwal बनाम/ 1(2),(1), Surat (Old Ward- A-301, Surya Plaza, U.M. Vs. 1(2)(6), Surat) Aaykar Road, Surat-395 007 Bhavan, Majura Gate, Surat- 395 001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aispa 2948 P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से /Assessee By Shri Manish Malpani, Ca राज" की ओर से /Revenue By Shri Ajay Uke, Sr-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 30/07/2025 उद्घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 27/10/2025

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149ASection 250Section 69Section 69C

1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well as in law, the ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi [CIT(A)] has erred in upholding the validity of the notice issued u/s 148A(b) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (the Act); the order passed u/s 148A(d) of the Act and the notice issued

ARVIND G. VALVI, INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(3),SURAT, SURAT vs. SWEETY GEMS PRIVATE LIMITED, SURAT

ITA 975/SRT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.975/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2014-15) (Physical Hearing) The Ito, Vs. Sweety Gems Pvt. Ltd., Ward -2(1)(3), 101, Nishit Diamond Complex, Gujjar Surat Falia, Haripura, Surat - 395003 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aancs4270N (Appellant) (Respondent) Cross Objection No.29/Srt/2024 (Arising In Ita No.975/Srt/2024) Assessment Year: (2014-15) Sweety Gems Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Ito, 101, Nishit Diamond Complex, Gujjar Ward -2(1)(3), Falia, Haripura, Surat - 395003 Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aancs4270N (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 148Section 148ASection 153ASection 250Section 69A

1)(3), Falia, Haripura, Surat - 395003 Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No: AANCS4270N (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri Ritesh Mishra, CIT-DR Respondent by Shri Rasesh Shah, CA Date of Hearing 10/03/2025 Date of Pronouncement 13/05/2025 आदेश / O R D E R PER BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH, AM: These two cross appeals by the revenue and assessee emanate from the order passed under

BIREN HARISHCHANDRA VAKHARIA ,SURAT vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(3), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assesse is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 485/SRT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha&Shri Bijayananda Pruseth

For Appellant: Shri P M JAGASETH, CAFor Respondent: Shri AJAY UKE, SR. DR
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 270ASection 44A

D E R PER Dr. DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JM: Captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19, is directed against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) vide order dated 04.03.2024, which in turn arises out of an assessment order passed by Income Tax Department / Assessing Officer under section (u/s.) 147 r.w.s