DCIT, CIRCLE-3(3), SURAT vs. SHRI RAVJIBHAI BECHARBHAI DHAMELIYA,, SURAT

In the result, assessee`s appeal for both the assessment years, that is,

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Hearing) Sl.

bogus purchases amounting to Rs.29,78,10,891/-, from various dummy concerns of Shri Rajendra Sohanlal Jain and Shri Surendra Jain and their Group was issued on 13.07.2017 and the assessee was requested to submit explanation with necessary supporting evidences on 25.07.2017. In response to which, the assessee vide letter dated 24.07.2017, requested to treat the return of income filed

SHRI RAVJIBHAI BECHARBHAI DHAMELIYA,,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(1(1), SURAT

In the result, assessee`s appeal for both the assessment years, that is,

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Hearing) Sl.

bogus purchases amounting to Rs.29,78,10,891/-, from various dummy concerns of Shri Rajendra Sohanlal Jain and Shri Surendra Jain and their Group was issued on 13.07.2017 and the assessee was requested to submit explanation with necessary supporting evidences on 25.07.2017. In response to which, the assessee vide letter dated 24.07.2017, requested to treat the return of income filed

ACIT, CIRCLE-3(3), SURAT vs. SHRI RAVJIBHAI BECHARBHAI DHAMELIYA, SURAT

In the result, assessee`s appeal for both the assessment years, that is,

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. A. L. Saini, Hon'Ble(Physical Hearing) Sl.

bogus purchases amounting to Rs.29,78,10,891/-, from various dummy concerns of Shri Rajendra Sohanlal Jain and Shri Surendra Jain and their Group was issued on 13.07.2017 and the assessee was requested to submit explanation with necessary supporting evidences on 25.07.2017. In response to which, the assessee vide letter dated 24.07.2017, requested to treat the return of income filed

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(7), SURAT vs. KAMAL KISHORE SONI, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.31 & 125/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surt [Pan: Aakps3474Q] Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.32 & 126/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] The Income Tax Officer, Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Vs. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat. [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.33 & 127/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] The Income Tax Officer, Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Vs. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

bogus purchase to many persons including the appellant. Based on this report, the ld. assessing officer had “reason to believe” that income was escaped the assessment. In the facts and circumstances, I am convinced that the re-opening in this case is justified. Further, in his submission and verbal arguments, the AR contested that the assessment is not made

KAMAL KISHORE SONI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(7), SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.31 & 125/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surt [Pan: Aakps3474Q] Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.32 & 126/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] The Income Tax Officer, Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Vs. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat. [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.33 & 127/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] The Income Tax Officer, Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Vs. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

bogus purchase to many persons including the appellant. Based on this report, the ld. assessing officer had “reason to believe” that income was escaped the assessment. In the facts and circumstances, I am convinced that the re-opening in this case is justified. Further, in his submission and verbal arguments, the AR contested that the assessment is not made

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(7), SURAT vs. KAMAL KISHORE SONI, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.31 & 125/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surt [Pan: Aakps3474Q] Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.32 & 126/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] The Income Tax Officer, Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Vs. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat. [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.33 & 127/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] The Income Tax Officer, Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Vs. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

bogus purchase to many persons including the appellant. Based on this report, the ld. assessing officer had “reason to believe” that income was escaped the assessment. In the facts and circumstances, I am convinced that the re-opening in this case is justified. Further, in his submission and verbal arguments, the AR contested that the assessment is not made

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(7), SURAT vs. KAMAL KISHORE SONI, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.31 & 125/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surt [Pan: Aakps3474Q] Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.32 & 126/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] The Income Tax Officer, Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Vs. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat. [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.33 & 127/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] The Income Tax Officer, Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Vs. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

bogus purchase to many persons including the appellant. Based on this report, the ld. assessing officer had “reason to believe” that income was escaped the assessment. In the facts and circumstances, I am convinced that the re-opening in this case is justified. Further, in his submission and verbal arguments, the AR contested that the assessment is not made

KAMAL KISHORE SONI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(7), SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.31 & 125/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surt [Pan: Aakps3474Q] Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.32 & 126/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] The Income Tax Officer, Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Vs. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat. [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.33 & 127/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] The Income Tax Officer, Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Vs. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

bogus purchase to many persons including the appellant. Based on this report, the ld. assessing officer had “reason to believe” that income was escaped the assessment. In the facts and circumstances, I am convinced that the re-opening in this case is justified. Further, in his submission and verbal arguments, the AR contested that the assessment is not made

KAMAL KISHORE SONI,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(7), SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.31 & 125/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2008-09 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surt [Pan: Aakps3474Q] Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.32 & 126/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2013-14 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] The Income Tax Officer, Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Vs. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat. [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.33 & 127/Srt/2019 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 Kamal Kishore Soni Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] The Income Tax Officer, Kamal Kishore Soni 311, Tulsi Appartment, 3Rd Floor, Ward-2(3)(7), Surat Vs. Somnath Mahadeo Ni Sheri, Mahidarpura, Surat [Pan: Aakps3474Q] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

bogus purchase to many persons including the appellant. Based on this report, the ld. assessing officer had “reason to believe” that income was escaped the assessment. In the facts and circumstances, I am convinced that the re-opening in this case is justified. Further, in his submission and verbal arguments, the AR contested that the assessment is not made

ARVINDKUMAR SONI,SURAT vs. ITO, WD-2(3)(7), SURAT, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.460/Srt/2019 Assessment Year: (2009-10) (Physical Court Hearing) The Ito, Ward-2(3)(7), Vs. Arvind Soni, Surat. Prop. Of M/S. Balajee Diamond, B-3, 701, Nakshara Platinum, Opp. Mathura Nagari, Palanpur Gam, Surat - 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bfmps0796F (Revenue)/(Appellant) (Assessee)/(Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.165/Srt/2021 Assessment Year: (2009-10) (Physical Court Hearing) Arvindkumar Soni, Vs. The Ito, Ward-2(3)(7), B-3, 701, Nakshara Platinum, Surat. Opp. Mathura Nagari, Planpur Gam, Surat-395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bfmps0796F (Appellant) (Respondent) Cross Objection. No.14/Srt/2021 [Arising Out Of Ita No. 460/Srt/2019 Assessment Year: (2009-10) (Physical Court Hearing) The Ito, Ward-2(3)(7), Vs. Arvind Soni, Surat. Prop. Of M/S. Balajee Diamond, B-3, 701, Nakshara Platinum, Opp. Mathura Nagari, Palanpur Gam, Surat - 395003 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bfmps0796F (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Prakash G. Jhunjhunwala, Ca With Assessee By Shri Anand R. Chourasia, Ca Respondent By Shri H. P. Meena, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 01/07/2022 25/07/2022 Date Of Pronouncement

bogus purchase, from Kotons Impex and Jalaram Enterprise was added to the total income of the assessee. 6. Aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the ld. CIT(A) who has dismissed the appeal of the assessee holding the reassessment proceedings as valid. Aggrieved by the order

ITO, WARD-2(3)(7), SURAT vs. ARVIND SONI, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.460/Srt/2019 Assessment Year: (2009-10) (Physical Court Hearing) The Ito, Ward-2(3)(7), Vs. Arvind Soni, Surat. Prop. Of M/S. Balajee Diamond, B-3, 701, Nakshara Platinum, Opp. Mathura Nagari, Palanpur Gam, Surat - 395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bfmps0796F (Revenue)/(Appellant) (Assessee)/(Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.165/Srt/2021 Assessment Year: (2009-10) (Physical Court Hearing) Arvindkumar Soni, Vs. The Ito, Ward-2(3)(7), B-3, 701, Nakshara Platinum, Surat. Opp. Mathura Nagari, Planpur Gam, Surat-395003. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bfmps0796F (Appellant) (Respondent) Cross Objection. No.14/Srt/2021 [Arising Out Of Ita No. 460/Srt/2019 Assessment Year: (2009-10) (Physical Court Hearing) The Ito, Ward-2(3)(7), Vs. Arvind Soni, Surat. Prop. Of M/S. Balajee Diamond, B-3, 701, Nakshara Platinum, Opp. Mathura Nagari, Palanpur Gam, Surat - 395003 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Bfmps0796F (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Prakash G. Jhunjhunwala, Ca With Assessee By Shri Anand R. Chourasia, Ca Respondent By Shri H. P. Meena, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 01/07/2022 25/07/2022 Date Of Pronouncement

bogus purchase, from Kotons Impex and Jalaram Enterprise was added to the total income of the assessee. 6. Aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the ld. CIT(A) who has dismissed the appeal of the assessee holding the reassessment proceedings as valid. Aggrieved by the order

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(3),, SURAT vs. SHRI RAVJIBHAI BECHARBHAI DHAMELIYA,, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.1239 To 1241/Ahd/2017 & Ita Nos.1523, 1524 & 1525/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2013-14 (Virtual Court Hearing) Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Prop. M/S. Amrut Exports, Circle-3(3), Surat Vrajshila, Nr. Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat. [Pan: Accpd5423C] Vs. Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Prop. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax M/S. Amrut Exports, Vrajshila, Nr. Circle-3(3), Surat Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat [Pan: Accpd5423C] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.A. राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By Shri H.P. Meena, Cit/ Dr & Ms. Anupama Singla, Sr. Dr. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing: 21.10.2021 उ"घोषणा क" तार"ख/Pronouncement On: 06.01.2022

bogus purchase of Rs.8,47,62,961/- as per decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case TK Proteins Pvt. Ltd. 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, It is therefore, prayed that the order of the Ld. CIT(A) Surat may be set aside and either the ratio of M/s Mayak Diamond

SHRI RAVJIBHAI B. DHAMELIYA,,SURAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(3),, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.1239 To 1241/Ahd/2017 & Ita Nos.1523, 1524 & 1525/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2013-14 (Virtual Court Hearing) Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Prop. M/S. Amrut Exports, Circle-3(3), Surat Vrajshila, Nr. Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat. [Pan: Accpd5423C] Vs. Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Prop. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax M/S. Amrut Exports, Vrajshila, Nr. Circle-3(3), Surat Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat [Pan: Accpd5423C] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.A. राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By Shri H.P. Meena, Cit/ Dr & Ms. Anupama Singla, Sr. Dr. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing: 21.10.2021 उ"घोषणा क" तार"ख/Pronouncement On: 06.01.2022

bogus purchase of Rs.8,47,62,961/- as per decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case TK Proteins Pvt. Ltd. 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, It is therefore, prayed that the order of the Ld. CIT(A) Surat may be set aside and either the ratio of M/s Mayak Diamond

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(3),, SURAT vs. SHRI RAVJIBHAI BECHARBHAI DHAMELIYA,, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.1239 To 1241/Ahd/2017 & Ita Nos.1523, 1524 & 1525/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2013-14 (Virtual Court Hearing) Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Prop. M/S. Amrut Exports, Circle-3(3), Surat Vrajshila, Nr. Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat. [Pan: Accpd5423C] Vs. Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Prop. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax M/S. Amrut Exports, Vrajshila, Nr. Circle-3(3), Surat Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat [Pan: Accpd5423C] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.A. राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By Shri H.P. Meena, Cit/ Dr & Ms. Anupama Singla, Sr. Dr. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing: 21.10.2021 उ"घोषणा क" तार"ख/Pronouncement On: 06.01.2022

bogus purchase of Rs.8,47,62,961/- as per decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case TK Proteins Pvt. Ltd. 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, It is therefore, prayed that the order of the Ld. CIT(A) Surat may be set aside and either the ratio of M/s Mayak Diamond

SHRI RAVJIBHAI B. DHAMELIYA,,SURAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(3),, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.1239 To 1241/Ahd/2017 & Ita Nos.1523, 1524 & 1525/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2013-14 (Virtual Court Hearing) Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Prop. M/S. Amrut Exports, Circle-3(3), Surat Vrajshila, Nr. Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat. [Pan: Accpd5423C] Vs. Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Prop. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax M/S. Amrut Exports, Vrajshila, Nr. Circle-3(3), Surat Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat [Pan: Accpd5423C] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.A. राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By Shri H.P. Meena, Cit/ Dr & Ms. Anupama Singla, Sr. Dr. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing: 21.10.2021 उ"घोषणा क" तार"ख/Pronouncement On: 06.01.2022

bogus purchase of Rs.8,47,62,961/- as per decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case TK Proteins Pvt. Ltd. 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, It is therefore, prayed that the order of the Ld. CIT(A) Surat may be set aside and either the ratio of M/s Mayak Diamond

SHRI RAVJIBHAI B. DHAMELIYA,,SURAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(3),, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.1239 To 1241/Ahd/2017 & Ita Nos.1523, 1524 & 1525/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2013-14 (Virtual Court Hearing) Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Prop. M/S. Amrut Exports, Circle-3(3), Surat Vrajshila, Nr. Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat. [Pan: Accpd5423C] Vs. Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Prop. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax M/S. Amrut Exports, Vrajshila, Nr. Circle-3(3), Surat Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat [Pan: Accpd5423C] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.A. राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By Shri H.P. Meena, Cit/ Dr & Ms. Anupama Singla, Sr. Dr. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing: 21.10.2021 उ"घोषणा क" तार"ख/Pronouncement On: 06.01.2022

bogus purchase of Rs.8,47,62,961/- as per decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case TK Proteins Pvt. Ltd. 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, It is therefore, prayed that the order of the Ld. CIT(A) Surat may be set aside and either the ratio of M/s Mayak Diamond

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(3),, SURAT vs. SHRI RAVJIBHAI BECHARBHAI DHAMELIYA,, SURAT

In the result the ground No

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Bleआ.अ.सं./I.T.A Nos.1239 To 1241/Ahd/2017 & Ita Nos.1523, 1524 & 1525/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2013-14 (Virtual Court Hearing) Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Prop. M/S. Amrut Exports, Circle-3(3), Surat Vrajshila, Nr. Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat. [Pan: Accpd5423C] Vs. Shrik Ravjibhai B Dhameliya Prop. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax M/S. Amrut Exports, Vrajshila, Nr. Circle-3(3), Surat Gajjar Petrol Pump, Kapodara Char Rasta, Varachha Road, Surat [Pan: Accpd5423C] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri Sapnesh Sheth, C.A. राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By Shri H.P. Meena, Cit/ Dr & Ms. Anupama Singla, Sr. Dr. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing: 21.10.2021 उ"घोषणा क" तार"ख/Pronouncement On: 06.01.2022

bogus purchase of Rs.8,47,62,961/- as per decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in case TK Proteins Pvt. Ltd. 6. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, It is therefore, prayed that the order of the Ld. CIT(A) Surat may be set aside and either the ratio of M/s Mayak Diamond

BALMUKUND M VAISHNAV,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(7), SURAT

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.204/Srt/2019 Assessment Year: (2013-14) (Physical Hearing) The Ito, Ward-2(3)(7), Vs. Balmukund M. Vaishnav, Surat. 5B/1054, Ramnanth Mahadev Ni Sheri, Haripura, Surat – 395009. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aokpv5065Q (Appellant) (Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.205/Srt/2019 Assessment Year: (2013-14) Balmukund M. Vaishnav, Vs. The Ito, Ward-2(3)(7), 5B/1054, Ramnanth Mahadev Ni Surat. Sheri, Haripura, Surat – 395009. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aokpv5065Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

bogus purchases, should also be deleted. 15. We note that assessee has raised additional ground of appeal on jurisdictional issue, which is reproduced below for ready reference: “1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case as well as law on the subject, the learned commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming the action