BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

336 results for “TDS”+ Section 6clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,907Delhi5,750Bangalore2,773Chennai2,445Kolkata1,698Pune1,546Ahmedabad1,245Hyderabad1,027Cochin798Indore756Jaipur715Patna557Chandigarh551Raipur494Nagpur398Karnataka390Visakhapatnam380Cuttack342Surat336Rajkot265Lucknow206Amritsar179Jabalpur148Jodhpur129Dehradun123Ranchi120Agra85Panaji81Guwahati79Telangana68Allahabad67SC24Varanasi23Calcutta19Kerala17Rajasthan9Himachal Pradesh8Punjab & Haryana5Orissa4Uttarakhand3J&K3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1Bombay1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)75Addition to Income74TDS59Section 26352Section 254(1)32Disallowance30Section 14826Section 6825Section 14424Section 40

AKSHAR GEMS,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR.3(2), SURAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 24/SRT/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Jan 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.24/Srt/2022 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: (2016-17) (Virtual Court Hearing) Akshar Gems, Assistant Commissioner Of 3Rd Floor, Shreeji Diamond Apartment, Vs. Income-Tax, Circle-3(2), Nandu Doshi Ni Wadi, Vastadevdi Road, Aaykar Bhavan Nr.Majura Katargam, Surat – 395004 Gate, Opp. New Civil Hospital, Surat-395001 (Appellant) (Respondent) "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aarfa3697A Assessee By Shri Mehul Shah, Ca Respondent By Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 27/12/2022 Date Of Pronouncement 30/01/2023

Section 195Section 195(6)Section 271Section 274

TDS as per the provisions of the Act. It is worthwhile to mention that Section 195(6) has been amended

SHRI DINESHBHAI VITTALBHAI PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,, SURAT

Showing 1–20 of 336 · Page 1 of 17

...
21
Deduction21
Section 15420

In the result, the appeal of the assessee partly allowed

ITA 970/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat03 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.970/Ahd/2016 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2009-10 Shri Dineshbhai Vittalbhai Income Tax Officer, Patel, Ward- 2(3)(7), Surat 6/1261, Bhut Sheri, Mahidharpura Surat Pan: Aatwpp 3597J अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 10(37)Section 143Section 148Section 77

section 77 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian of the said acquired property. The appellant has referred the letter no.TBT/OUT/4089/22 dated. 23.09.2014 by which the Dineshbhai Vittalbhai Patel v. ITO-WD-2(3)(7) Surat / I.T.A.No.970/AHD/2016/A.Y.09-10 Page 6

DHANSUKHBHAI PARAGJIBHAI PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(3),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee partly allowed

ITA 1021/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat03 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.1021/Ahd/2016 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2009-10 Shri Dhansukhbhai Deputy Commissioner Of Paragjibhai Patel, Income-Tax, 143, Brahaman Faliya, Circle - 2(3) Surat Dindoli Udhna 394210 Pan: Avdpp7007 L अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 10(37)Section 143Section 148Section 77

section 77 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian of the said acquired property. The appellant has referred the letter no.TBT/OUT/4089/22 dated. 23.09.2014 by which the Dhansukhbhai Paragjibhai Patel v. DCIT-2(3) Surat / I.T.A.No1021/AHD/2016/A.Y.09-10 Page 6 of 16 land

SHRI PRADIPKUMAR A. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1572/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian

SHRI NAVNITBHAI M. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1570/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian

SHRI MOHANBHAI M. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1571/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian

VASANTBHAI MOHANBHAI BHANDHARI,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(4),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1690/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian

SHRI PRAVINKUMAR M. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(2),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1565/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian

SHRI DINESHCHANDRA C. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(1),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1563/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian

SHRI SATISHBHAI M. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1566/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian

SHRI SAMEERKUMAR J. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1568/AHD/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian

SHRI AMBUBHAI C. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1567/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian

SHRI BABUBHAI J. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(3),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1569/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian

NARESH M. BHANDARI,,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-2(3),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1692/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian

SHRI AMRATLAL MAGANLAL DESAI,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(1),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 448/AHD/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian

PREMILABEN M. BHANDARI,,SURAT vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-2(3),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1691/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian

SHRI ISHWARBHAI ZINABHAI PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(2),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1445/AHD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian

SHRI BALWANTRAY M. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(1),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 453/AHD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian

SHRI ISHWARBHAI M. PATEL,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(2),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1562/AHD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian

SMT. CHANCHALBEN MOHANBHAI BHANDAR,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3)(5),, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 476/AHD/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meena, Accoutant Member Sn

Section 10(37)

6. Being, aggrieved the assessee filed this appeal before the Tribunal. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the agricultural land was compulsory acquired by the SMC under section 77 Page 7 of 15 of BPMC Act and who had full power and authority given by the Central Government for acquisition of immovable property and was declared trustee & custodian