Search: TDS | BharatTax

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 271C(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 201(1)13 Section 271C11 Section 2(22)(e)8 Section 271(1)(c)8 Section 1946 TDS6 Penalty4 Section 10(5)3 Section 250(6)2 Section 201

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3, VALSAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 146/SRT/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Dr. A. L. Sainiआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.146/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Virtual Hearing) Raj Kishore Prasad, Vs. The Ito, 201, 2Nd Floor, Devashish Complex, Ward-3, Nr. Regenta Central Antarim Hotel, Valsad Off Cg Road, Ahmedabad "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aitpp0535A (Assessee) (Respondent)

Section 10(5)Section 144Section 147Section 271(1)(c)

271C, for failure to deduct tax at source (TDS), has been deleted by the Tribunal, in respect of ITA Nos. 1661/Ahd/2017, 1662/Ahd/2017, 1664/Ahd/2017 and 2113/Ahd/2013. Since the penalty levied on State Bank of India (employer) in respect of the same LTC has been deleted by the Tribunal, therefore in the hands of the assessee, the penalty under section 271(1

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3, VALSAD

SHILPRAJ DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS- 2,, SURAT

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3, VALSAD

SHILPRAJ DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS- 2,, SURAT

SHILPRAJ DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE JCIT, T.D.S. RANGE,, SURAT

RAHUL COAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,SURAT vs. ITO TDS-2, SURAT

DINESHKUMAR UJABHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS 3, , AHMEDABAD

DINESHKUMAR UJABHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS 3, , AHMEDABAD