Search: TDS | BharatTax

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 271Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271C9 Section 271(1)(c)6 TDS4 Section 10(5)3 Section 201(1)3 Section 250(6)2 Penalty2 Natural Justice2 Limitation/Time-bar2 Condonation of Delay

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3, VALSAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 146/SRT/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat04 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Dr. A. L. Sainiआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.146/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Virtual Hearing) Raj Kishore Prasad, Vs. The Ito, 201, 2Nd Floor, Devashish Complex, Ward-3, Nr. Regenta Central Antarim Hotel, Valsad Off Cg Road, Ahmedabad "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aitpp0535A (Assessee) (Respondent)

Section 10(5)Section 144Section 147Section 271(1)(c)

section 271C, for failure to deduct tax at source (TDS), has been deleted by the Tribunal, in respect of ITA Nos. 1661/Ahd/2017

RAHUL COAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,SURAT vs. ITO TDS-2, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3, VALSAD

RAHUL COAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,SURAT vs. ITO TDS-2, SURAT

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3, VALSAD

RAHUL COAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,SURAT vs. ITO TDS-2, SURAT

DINESHKUMAR UJABHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS 3, , AHMEDABAD

DINESHKUMAR UJABHAI PATEL,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS 3, , AHMEDABAD