BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 234clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi554Mumbai378Bangalore156Karnataka109Chennai98Ahmedabad98Pune73Kolkata65Jaipur63Cochin45Hyderabad38Chandigarh35Cuttack20Visakhapatnam17Amritsar16Rajkot16Indore15Nagpur11Dehradun9Allahabad7Guwahati7Lucknow6Varanasi4Surat3Kerala3SC3Raipur3Telangana3Ranchi2Patna2Calcutta1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 2636Addition to Income3Section 254(1)2Section 143(2)2Section 682Disallowance2

HASUMATIBEN JAGDISHBHAI PATEL, ,SURAT vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VALSAD

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 322/SRT/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat22 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr Arjun Lal Sainiआ.अ.सं./Ita No.322/Srt/2023 (Ay 2018-19) (Hearing In Physical Court) Hasumatiben Jagdishbhai Principal Commissioner Of Patel Income-Tax, Valsad, 301, Vs 80 Shree Ram Estate, Opp. 3Rd Floor, Income Tax Pandesara Petrol Pump Office, Palak Arcade, Shanti Bhedwad, Surat-394220 Nagar, Tithal Road, Pan : Aaopp 1698 K Valsad-396001 अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 254(1)Section 263

TDS or that such issues were not verified. The Ld. PCIT gave his observation / findings without giving any opportunity of such additional issue. The Ld. AR for the assessee submits that without giving any opportunity on the issue which was not subject-matter of show cause, the order passed by Ld.PCIT under section 263 to that extent is absolutely illegal

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3,, SURAT vs. M/S. JARIWALA ENTERPRISE,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby ordered to be dismissed

ITA 202/AHD/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Surat30 Sept 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm & Shri O.P.Meena, Am Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, M/S. Jariwala Enterprises, Circle-3, Surat 120-121, Abhikram, Opp. Bhulka Bhavan School, Adajan, Surat-395010. Pan/Gir No.Aacfj0019L Appellant) .. Respondent) Revenue By Shri B. P. K. Panda (Sr. Dr) Assessee By Shri Mehul R. Shah

Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 145(2)Section 145(3)Section 44A

TDS. The A.O. after analysis of the agreement between HCL and the assessee held that the relation between the two was of principal and agent and the payments of sales incentive/promotions/price drops were in the nature of turnover commission. On the basis of this inference he further held that the relation between the assessee and his customers (retailers) which

ARJUNSINH HARISINH THAKOR,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BARDOLI

In the result, grounds No

ITA 245/SRT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat15 Jun 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) Arjunsinh Harisinh Thakor, I.T.O., 1 Thakor Niwas, Zanda Chowk, Ward-1, Vs. Tarasadi Road, Kosamba, Bardoli. Surat-394120. Pan No. Aabpt 1270 G Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 115BSection 254(1)Section 68

234 ITR 571 (Bom) (2) Lakshmi Rice Mills Vs CIT (1974) 97 ITR 258 (Pat) (3) Gur Prasad Hari Das Vs CIT (1963) 47 ITR 634 (All) (4) Kanpur Steel Co. Ltd. Vs CIT (1957) 32 ITR 56 (All) (5) Sri Sri Nilkantha Narayan Singh Vs CIT (1951) 20 ITR 8 (Pat) (6) CIT Vs Kulvant