Search: TDS | BharatTax

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 206clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 206C8 Section 271C7 Section 201(1)4 Section 2(22)(e)4 Disallowance3 Addition to Income3 Section 254(1)2 Section 36(1)(va)2 Section 2(24)(x)2 Section 201

THE ITO, WARD-1,, NA vs. ARIVS.SHRI ANILKUMAR AMRUTLAL CHAHWALA, NAVSARI

In the result, this ground of appeal is rejected

ITA 1003/AHD/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Surat14 Jun 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble(Virtual Hearing) आ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.2078/Ahd/2010 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2006-07 आ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.1003/Ahd/2011 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2007-08 The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Shri Anil Kumar Amrutlal Chahwala, Ward-(1), Navsari. 102, Trimurti Complex, Vijalpore, Navsari. [Pan: Abnpc 6308 F] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""थ"/Respondent

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)

206/- under section 40(a)(ia), as the A.O. has made addition of entire labour expenses in the assessment order, so he has not made separately disallowed the amount under section 40(a)(ia). The Assessing Officer disallowed the payment to labour contractor exceeding Rs.50,000/- without remitting TDS

SHREE MAHUVA PRADESH SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD.,,MAHUVA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER.TDS-4,, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

THE ITO, WARD-1,, NA vs. ARIVS.SHRI ANILKUMAR AMRUTLAL CHAHWALA, NAVSARI

SHREE MAHUVA PRADESH SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD.,,MAHUVA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER.TDS-4,, SURAT

THE ITO, WARD-1,, NA vs. ARIVS.SHRI ANILKUMAR AMRUTLAL CHAHWALA, NAVSARI

SHREE MAHUVA PRADESH SAHAKARI KHAND UDYOG MANDLI LTD.,,MAHUVA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER.TDS-4,, SURAT

RAHUL COAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,SURAT vs. ITO TDS-2, SURAT

SHREE DURGA SYNTEX PRIVATE LIMITED,SURAT vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4, SURAT

DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(2), SURAT vs. M/S. SHREE DURGA SYNTEX PVT. LTD, SURAT