BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai643Delhi409Bangalore259Kolkata201Chennai168Karnataka56Hyderabad41Jaipur26Ahmedabad20Cochin15Indore15Pune14Chandigarh13Telangana11Panaji10Amritsar10Jabalpur8Patna8Raipur8Rajkot7Surat7Dehradun6Cuttack6Agra5Jodhpur4Calcutta4Lucknow4Visakhapatnam3SC3Nagpur2Varanasi2Ranchi1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 26312Section 201(1)6Addition to Income6TDS5Section 143(3)4Section 1484Section 404Section 2014Section 44A3Section 194J

ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL CO. PVT LTD,SURAT vs. PCIT-1, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 541/SRT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat19 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.541/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Physical Hearing) Engineering Professional Co. Pvt. Ltd., Vs. The Pcit -1, 444, Royal Arcade, Opp. Sarthana Zoo, Surat Varachha Road, Near Sarthana Jakatnaka, Surat – 395006, Gujarat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aabce0313Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri P. M. Jagasheth, Ca Respondent By Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 13/02/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 19/02/2025

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263

194J and 192 of the Act respectively. Non-deduction of TDS attracts provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act and 30% of Rs.31

3
Natural Justice3
Deduction3

THE UDHNA CITIZEN CO OPP. BANK LIMITED ,NOW MERGE WITH KALUPUR COMMERCIAL CO.OP. BANK LTD,AHMEDABAD vs. I.T.O TDS -2 , SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 512/SRT/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat20 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Gargshri Narendra Prasad Sinha

For Appellant: Ms Urvashi Shodhan, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 194ISection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)Section 250Section 40

TDS was made thereon. She further submitted that the entire amount was already disallowed under the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, therefore, no addition u/s. 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act was called for. 6. Per Contra Shri Ajay Uke, Ld. Sr. DR submitted that as per the provisions of section 194I and 194J

SHREE ABHISHEK BIPINBHAI NAIK,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, the ground No

ITA 12/SRT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat31 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Virtual Hearing) Abhishek Bipinbhai Naik I.T.O., (Prop. Of M/S Shivbhole Services), Ward 1(2)(1), Vs. House No. 1, Desai Faliyu, At Po Surat. Vaktana, Tal, Choryasi Via Sachin, Surat-394230. Pan No. Agppn 5994 H Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 254(1)Section 271ASection 69A

TDS was deducted under Section 194J of the Act and the copy of such TDS were furnished. The Assessing Officer

N R CORPORATION,SURAT vs. PCIT-1, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 526/SRT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.526/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: 2018-19 (Physical Hearing) N. R. Corporation, Vs. The Pcit - 1, B-202, Capital Status, Opp – Hariom Surat Nagar, Near Atman Park, L. P. Savani Road, Adajan, Surat - 395009 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aamfn9368A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Suresh K. Kabra, Ca Respondent By Shri Ritesh Mishra, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 13/03/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 28/05/2025

Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263Section 40

section 194C and 194J of the Act are applicable to these expenses. However, the AO has not examined the same and not disallowed any amount u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. Since the assessee failed to deduct tax on such expenditure, the AO should have disallowed an amount of Rs.48,04,045/-, being 30% of total expenses of Rs.1

M/S. R.WADIWALA SECURITIES PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(1), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1566/AHD/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Surat12 Feb 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.1566/Ahd/2013 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 M/S. R. Wadiwala Securities Pvt. Ltd., V. Income Tax Officer, 9/2003-04, Limda Chowk Main Road, Ward-4(1), Surat. Surat-395 003. [Pan: Aajpt 4629 F] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""थ"/Respondent

Section 143(3)

TDS on such payments would, therefore, be deductible under Section 194J of the Act. In view of above conclusions, it will

SUAJKISHAN DEOKISHAN THANVI,SILVASSA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD2, VAPI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed in above terms

ITA 145/SRT/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 Apr 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.145/Srt/2021 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2010-11) (Virtual Court Hearing) Suajkishan Deokishan Income Tax Officer Thanvi, B/204, Mayuri Ward-2, Vapi (Camp At Silvassa), Vs. Apartment, Amli Road, First Floor, Vee Bee Mall, Nr. Civil Silvassa-396230 Court, Tokarkhada, Silvassa-396230 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Acypj 7355 D (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) िनधा"रती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Satyadev Purohit, C.A & Shri Rajendra Joshi, Ar राज"व क" ओर से /Respondent By: Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr-D.R

For Appellant: Shri Satyadev Purohit, C.A &For Respondent: Shri Vinod Kumar, Sr-D.R
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 194J

194J of the Act to the tune of Rs.6,34,765/- on which Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) has already been deducted and Assessing Officer did not give benefit of TDS deducted on the professional receipts and benefit of chapter VIA deductions. Therefore, the Ld. Counsel contended that assessee should be given benefit of TDS deducted on his professional receipts

S M CONSTRUCTION,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(3)(1), SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 539/SRT/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Surat29 Jan 2026AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kambleassessment Year 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Viral Marfatia, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Jayshree Thakur, Sr. D.R
Section 133(6)Section 143Section 148Section 194JSection 44A

section addition was made. (4) That, the Assessing officer failed to appreciate the facts of the case in the right perspective and order is issued without considering the reply of appellant, without issuing speaking order. Order issued was against the natural justice and need to be deleted. (5) That, without prejudice to above, an addition of Rs.275,378 being