DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(2), SURAT vs. M/S. SHREE DURGA SYNTEX PVT. LTD, SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Physical Court) D.C.I.T. M/S Shree Durga Syntex Pvt. Ltd., Circle-2(1)(2), Block No. 129 & 175, Plot No. Z&E, R.S. Vs. Room No. 205, Aayakar No. 120, Tal: Jolva-394305, Dist- Surat. Bhavan, Majura Gate, Pan: Aabcd 8894 P Surat. Appellant Respondednt M/S Shree Durga Syntex Pvt. Ltd., A.C.I.T. Block No. 129 & 175, Plot No. Circle-4, Vs. Z&E, Jolva Rs No. 120 & 120/1, Surat. Surat-394305. Pan: Aabcd 8894 P Appellant Respondednt

Section 133(6) of the Act. The Assessing Officer alleged that Sonic Biochem Extractions Ltd. was in the business of pharmaceuticals ingredients. However, he failed to appreciate that it was not the real criteria to judge and determine the exact business of the company from broad projection displayed on any website. The website itself suggesting large area of business operations

ANJANI INFRA,SURAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, SURAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court) Anjani Infra Dy. Commissioner Of Block No. 142, Fp No.47, T.P. Income Tax, Vs Scheme No. 27, Shangrila Central Circle-2, Heights, Moje Villge, Kosad, Surat-395001 Pan : Aawfa 0376 M Assessee / Appellant Revenue /Respondent

section 68 and disallowed the professional fees. On further appeal before the Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] the action of Assessing Officer was upheld. Thus, further aggrieved the assessee has filed present appeal before us. 3. We have heard the submission of Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) represent assessee and Ld. Departmental Representative (DR) for the 2 Anjar

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR - 4, SURAT vs. NARESHKUMAR B. AGARWAL, SURAT

TDS for Rs.\n1,15,000/- in page 73 of A-23.\nxiii) The Respondent strongly relies on decision of PCIT V. Shri Kuberji Developers\n(IT (SS) A. No. 7 / SRT / 2024) (Paper book page No. 41 to 50) and DCIT V.\nHiteshkumar Laljibhai Patel (IT (SS) A. No. 114 / SRT / 2023) wherein addition\nwas made on the base

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR - 4, SURAT vs. NARESHKUMAR B. AGARWAL, SURAT

TDS for Rs.\n1,15,000/- in page 73 of A-23.\nxiii) The Respondent strongly relies on decision of PCIT V. Shri Kuberji Developers\n(IT (SS) A. No. 7 / SRT / 2024) (Paper book page No. 41 to 50) and DCIT V.\nHiteshkumar Laljibhai Patel (IT (SS) A. No. 114 / SRT / 2023) wherein addition\nwas made on the base

NARESHKUMAR B. AGARWAL,SURAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIR - 4, SURAT

TDS for Rs.\n1,15,000/- in page 73 of A-23.\nxiii) The Respondent strongly relies on decision of PCIT V. Shri Kuberji Developers\n(IT (SS) A. No. 7 / SRT / 2024) (Paper book page No. 41 to 50) and DCIT V.\nHiteshkumar Laljibhai Patel (IT (SS) A. No. 114 / SRT / 2023) wherein addition\nwas made on the base