Search: TDS | BharatTax

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 14Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14A15 Section 80P(2)(a)8 Section 80P(2)(c)8 Section 143(3)7 Addition to Income7 Deduction5 Section 80P(2)(A)4 Section 234B4 Section 251(1)(a)4 Section 36(1)(va)

KIRTIKUMAR NAGINDAS SHAH,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(6), SURAT

In the result, ground No.2 raised by the assessee is allowed

ITA 535/SRT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat12 Oct 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Dr. A. L. Sainiआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.535/Srt/2023 Assessment Year: (2014-15) (Physical Hearing) Kiritkumar Nagindas Shah, Vs. The Ito, A-1103, Regent Residency, Near Ward – 2(3)(6), Saurabh Society, Pal, Surat Surat – 395009, Gujarat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Anjps9031P (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 145Section 14ASection 40

section 14 of the I.T. Act attracts in your case. Therefore, you are asked to furnish explanation as to why expenditure incurred of Rs.7,56,965/- for earning exempt income should not be disallowed u/s 14A of the I.T. Act as worked out of Rs.7,56,965/- as per rule 8D of the income tax. Further, it is noticed that

KIRTIKUMAR NAGINDAS SHAH,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(6), SURAT

KIRTIKUMAR NAGINDAS SHAH,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(3)(6), SURAT

SACH ELECTRO MECH PVT. LTD.,,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(2),, SURAT

GANDEVI TALUKA KHEDUT SAHAKARI SANGH LTD.,,NA vs. ARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, NAVSARI

GANDEVI TALUKA KHEDUT SAHAKARI SANGH LTD.,,NA vs. ARIVS.INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, NAVSARI

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, NA vs. ARIVS.GANDEVI TALUKA KHEDUT SAHAKARI SANGH LTD.,, NAVSARI

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, NA vs. ARIVS.GANDEVI TALUKA KHEDUT SAHAKARI SANGH LTD.,, NAVSARI

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, SURAT, SURAT vs. J.B. AND BROTHERS PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI