FORTUNE DREAM CON PVT. LTD,VAPI vs. ITO, WARD-2, VAPI, VAPI
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed
ITA 321/SRT/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Surat10 May 2022AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Jm & Dr. A. L. Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.321/Srt/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2014-15) (Physical Court Hearing) Vs. The Ito, Ward-2, 3Rd Floor, Fortune Dream Con Pvt. Ltd., Plot No. 165/C/3, Opp. Fortune Pakak Arcade, Aayakar Bhavan, Mall, Gidc, Vapi. Shantinagar Tithal Road, Valsad "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aabcf 4561 F (Assessee) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Suresh K. Kabra, Ca Revenue By : Shri Deependra Kumar, Sr. Dr सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 29/04/2022 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 10/05/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A. L. Saini: Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year (Ay) 2014-15, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Valsad [In Short “The Ld. Cit(A)”] In Appeal No. Cit(A)/Vls/115/17-18 Dated 14.05.2019 Which In Turn Arises Out Of Penalty Order Passed By Assessing Officer Under Section 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”] Dated 30.06.2017. 2. Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are As Follows: “1. The Ld Cit(A) Had Erred On The Facts Of The Case In Upholding The Levy Of Penalty U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Act.”
For Appellant: Shri Suresh K. Kabra, CAFor Respondent: Shri Deependra Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)
TDS to the tune of Rs.1,54,112/-. During assessment proceedings, Assessing Officer added the interest income of Rs.15,41,117/- in the income of the assessee and initiated penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The assessing officer also noticed that assessee did not file any appeal against the said addition made by the assessing officer, before
