C.I.T.,MUMBAI vs. M/S.WALFORT SHARE & STOCK BROKERS P.LTD

Bench: S.H. KAPADIA SWATANTER KUMAR

purchase the entire price paid would be in the nature of capital outlay and no part of it can be set off as expenditure against income accruing on those securities. The real objection of the Department appears to be that the assessee is getting tax-free dividend; that at the same time it is claiming loss on the sale

A.P. HOUSING BOARD vs. MOHAMMED SADATULLAH

bogus co-operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in large scale and unprecedented and fraudulent sales of lands belonging to the Government, local authority, religious or charitable institutions or endowments including a wakf or private persons, through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of the people resulting in large accumulation

BIKRAM CHATTERJI vs. UNION OF INDIA

section 8 of the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act, 2016 (for short, ‘the RERA’) and also in view of the provisions contained in sections 13 and 14 of the U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 (for short, ‘the Industrial Development Act’), the lease deeds granted by Noida and Greater Noida authorities were ordered to be cancelled. In the lease

STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) vs. NAVJOT SANDHU @ AFSAN GURU

Bench: P. VENKATARAMA REDDI P.P. NAOLEKAR

Section 30 of the Evidence Act and therefore such a confession cannot be used against the co-accused even under Section 30 of the Evidence Act. While on the subject of confession made to a police officer under sub- section (1) of Section 32 of POTA, it would be apposite to refer in brief to the decision of this Court

SUSME BUILDERS PVT. LTD vs. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY AND ORS

Bench: Us Graphic Photographs Showing The Sordid Conditions In Which These Slum Dwellers Continue To Reside Despite Having Entered Into An Agreement With The Appellant More Than 30 Years Back To Develop The Slums & Rehabilitate The Slum Dwellers In Proper Accommodation.

purchase additional area of 60 or 110 sq. ft. by paying for the extra area at the rate of Rs. 350 per sq. ft.. The project was to be completed within a period of 5 years. Consequent to the agreement, the 5 Society executed a power of attorney in favour of the nominee of Susme on 07.04.1986 virtually empowering

AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORPORATION vs. MAC LABORATORIES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR

Bench: MADON D.P.

section (1) have been complied with to his satisfaction, the Registrar shall forward the application together with his report and all the relevant documents to the Central Government. 303 (3) On receipt of an application under sub-section (2), The Central Government, having regard to all the circumstances of the case and to the interests of the general public

JUST RIGHTS FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE vs. S. HARISH

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA

Section 15 of the POCSO is in three parts. The legislature by virtue of the 2019 Amendment Act has now made three different forms of storage or possession of child pornography a punishable offence under the said provision, unlike the erstwhile provision, which had criminalized only one form of storage of child pornography. 77. Section 15 sub-section

JUSTICE K.S.PUTTASWAMY(RETD) vs. UNION OF INDIA

Appeal is allowed accordingly

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

Section 4 of Aadhaar lays down the properties of an Writ Petition (Civil) No. 494 of 2012 & c onnected matters Page 73 of 567 Aadhaar number. Sub-section (3) of Section 4 reads as under: “(3) An Aadhaar number, in physical or electronic form subject to authentication and other conditions, as may be specified by regulations, may be accepted

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (CBI) vs. THOMMANDRU HANNAH VIJAYALAKSHMI @ T.H. VIJAYALAKSHMI

The appeal is allowed and the impugned judgment of the Single Judge of the

Bench: Registering An Fir D.1 Precedents Of This Court D.2 Cbi Manual D.3 Analysis E Whether The Fir Should Be Quashed E.1 Scope Of Review Before The High Court E.2 Whether The Fir Is Liable To Be Quashed In The Present Case F Conclusion

263 PART C 12 10 Mr Siddharth Luthra and Mr Siddharth Dave, Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents opposed the submissions and urged that: (i) The Telangana High Court had jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition since: a. No assets of the respondents are located in the State of Tamil Nadu, while many of the properties are located

ZAKIA AHSAN JAFRI vs. THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR

Section 2(h) of the Code. The expression “investigation” also means finding out footprint of the statement/allegation, which is to undertake the meaningful investigation in respect of every singular aspect. The SIT has not maintained the purity in investigation and failed to investigate crucial aspects warranting further investigation. (qq) The officers, who collaborated in the conspiracy, were eventually rehabilitated