BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 253(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai260Delhi227Jaipur41Chennai32Chandigarh30Bangalore22Pune19Kolkata16Ahmedabad14SC11Lucknow10Indore9Rajkot9Dehradun8Cochin6Varanasi5Amritsar4Surat4Hyderabad3Allahabad3Cuttack2Jodhpur1Raipur1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 144C6Section 806Section 6(1)3Section 23Deduction3Section 6(2)2Section 62Section 112Section 1532Capital Gains

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHELF DRILLING RON TAPPMEYER LIMITED

The appeals are allowed

C.A. No.-010586-010589 - 2025Supreme Court08 Aug 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

Section 144CSection 153Section 153(1)Section 44B

253(1)(d), an order passed by an Assessing Officer under sub-section (3) of Section 143 or Section 147 or Section 153A or Section 153C in pursuance of the directions issued by the DRP, or an order passed under Section 154 in respect of such order can be appealed directly to the tribunal. Page 41 of 112 Material relied

RAJ PAL SINGH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX HARYANA

In the result, this appeal fails and is, therefore, dismissed

2
Exemption2
C.A. No.-002416-002416 - 2010Supreme Court25 Aug 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

Section 256(1)Section 4Section 45Section 6

price of the land fixed by the Collector to the land owners. From the copy of the jamabandi attached with this file, khasra Nos. 361 and 364 measuring 5 kanals and 7 marlas were not on the lease with the college. But the Management is claiming compensation for this land also. In these circumstances, the college management cannot be awarded

THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX) vs. TIGER GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL II HOLDINGS

C.A. No.-000262-000262 - 2026Supreme Court15 Jan 2026

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

transfer of the CGP share and not by virtue of various clauses of SPA. In a case like the present one, where the structure has existed for a considerable length of time generating taxable revenues right from 1994 and where the court is satisfied that the transaction satisfies all the parameters of “participation in 66 investment” then in such

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. AHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

C.A. No.-021762-021762 - 2017Supreme Court19 Oct 2022

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 12AA(1) of the IT Act, on 18.05.1979 and is engaged in the activity of promotion of the export of all kind of ready-made garments, knitwear, and garments made of leather, jute and hemp. It does not per se engage in any activity for profit, and its mandate is to ensure that Indian apparel manufacturers, are given forums

INCOME TAX OFFICER AND ANR. vs. V.MOHAN AND ANR

C.A. No.-008592-008593 - 2010Supreme Court14 Dec 2021

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

Section 2Section 2(2)(c)Section 6Section 6(1)Section 6(2)

253  (1999) 8 SCC 266 19 23. It is then contended that on account of inordinate and undue delay, the proceedings suffer from the vice of arbitrariness and irrationality.  In that, the convict was convicted on 23.11.1969 for an   offence   punishable   under   the   1962   Act.     The   properties   in question belonging to the respondents were acquired between 1959 till   1980.     Whereas

DY.COMMR.OF INCOME TAX vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS

- 0Supreme Court03 Dec 2008
Section 11

price can be taken and not the entire amount. 253 Unexplained Stocks Consent decrees passed by the Supreme Court were not challenged by the appellant. 101 Unexplained money/ Deposits in Banks For an amount of Rs. 18.75 crores decree of Special Court in favour of SBI, w.r.t 64.94 and 17.77 crores Bank filing affidavit stating that the amount never transferred

RAMNATH AND CO. vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-002506-002509 - 2020Supreme Court05 Jun 2020

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

Section 80

5 RC-CN” shall also do everything that is required to ensure highest standards of quality hygiene and freshness of products including supervision at various stages. Article 4: HOKO pays to RC-CN 0.7% of the invoice amount on the C & F basis and US$ 2,000.00 per month as commission. When the quality of goods is found

THE LIQUIDATORS OF PURSA LIMITED vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BIHAR

Appeal is allowed and the

- 0Supreme Court09 Feb 1954
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BIHAR
Section 10Section 66Section 66(1)

253 1954 SCR 767 CITATOR INFO : E 1954 SC 470 (65) D 1961 SC 398 (7,10,12,16) R 1965 SC 33 (6) F 1965 SC1358 (11,23) RF 1969 SC 869 (5) R 1971 SC 794 (12) ACT: Income-tax Act (XI of 1922) s. 10(2) (vii) proviso 2--Any such machinery or plant must have been

PINGLE INDUSTRIES LTD., SECUNDERABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal fails, and will be dismissed with

- 0Supreme Court26 Apr 1960
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYDERABAD

section reads as follows: " 12 (1). The tax shall be payable by an assessee under the head profits and gains of business, profession or vocation in respect of the profits and gains of any business, profession or vocation carried or by him. (2) Such profits or gains shall be computed after making the following allowances, namely:- ...................................................... (XV) Any expenditure

MISS DHUN DADABHOY KAPADIA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY

- 0Supreme Court31 Oct 1966
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY
Section 12BSection 66A(2)

transfer the right, and the amount which she lost in the form of depreciation of her original shares in order to acquire that right. [5 A-E] 2 C.I.T,. Bihar v. Dalmia Investment Co. Ltd. [1964] 7 S.C.R. 210 followed. JUDGMENT: CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 757 of 1965. Appeal from the judgment and order dated August 24/25

M.J.EXPORTS LTD. vs. CUSTOMS,EX.&GOLD(CONTROL)APP.TRI

C.A. No.-004105-004105 - 1991Supreme Court14 May 1992
For Respondent: CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND GOLD (CONTROL) APPELLATETRIBUNAL, BOMBAY
Section 113Section 114Section 25

5. The goods in question, being the photographic films (colour), fall under App.7, List 8, Part II, Serial No.41 of the Import and Export Policy, 1988- 91, and their import is allowed by all persons for actual use/stock and sale. The contention of Mr. aggarwal is that since the goods were imported for stock 319 and sale, these could