BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

135 results for “transfer pricing”

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,868Mumbai5,735Bangalore2,320Chennai1,313Kolkata1,109Pune911Hyderabad872Ahmedabad857Karnataka807Jaipur495Chandigarh337Surat333Indore294Cochin258Visakhapatnam162Rajkot145SC135Telangana114Lucknow94Cuttack93Nagpur92Calcutta76Raipur73Amritsar63Jodhpur39Guwahati39Agra39Dehradun38Jabalpur18A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN17Ranchi17Kerala15Rajasthan14Panaji13Varanasi13Allahabad12Patna11Orissa9Punjab & Haryana4Andhra Pradesh2S.B. SINHA MARKANDEY KATJU1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1ANIL R. DAVE DIPAK MISRA1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1DIPAK MISRA V. GOPALA GOWDA1

Key Topics

Addition to Income25Section 11A23Penalty23Section 419Section 80H18Exemption18Deduction15Section 35A13Section 1112Section 41(2)

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 MUMBAI vs. M/S S.G. ASIA HOLDINGS (INDIA) PVT. LTD

The Appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent

C.A. No.-006144-006144 - 2019Supreme Court13 Aug 2019

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 143(3)Section 92

PRICE UNDER SECTION 92 – GUIDELINES TO TRANSFER PRICING OFFICERS AND ASSESSING OFFICERS TO OPERATIONALISE TRANSFER PRICING PROVISIONS AND TO HAVE

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHELF DRILLING RON TAPPMEYER LIMITED

The appeals are allowed

C.A. No.-010586-010589 - 2025Supreme Court08 Aug 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

Section 144C

Showing 1–20 of 135 · Page 1 of 7

10
Section 2699
Limitation/Time-bar9
Section 153
Section 153(1)
Section 44B

Transfer Pricing Officer, within two months from the end of the month in which such order of the Transfer Pricing

ASSTT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX I NEW DELHI vs. M/S E FUNDS IT SOLUTION INC

C.A. No.-006082-006082 - 2015Supreme Court24 Oct 2017

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

pricing adjudication by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO, for short) and the Assessing Officer (AO, for short) in the returns

SAP LABS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER CIRCLE 6 (1) (1) BANGALORE

Appeals are allowed

C.A. No.-008463-008463 - 2022Supreme Court19 Apr 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

transfer pricing, the arm’s length price is to be determined taking into consideration the guidelines stipulated under the aforesaid

COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS vs. M/S. FERODO INDIA PVT. LTD

C.A. No.-008426-008426 - 2002Supreme Court21 Feb 2008
For Respondent: M/s Ferodo India Pvt. Ltd
Section 14

price method and cost plus method under the transfer pricing in the Income-tax Act, 1961. Role of Interpretative Notes

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JINDAL STEEL THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

Appeals are hereby dismissed

C.A. No.-013771-013771 - 2015Supreme Court06 Dec 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

Section 260ASection 80

transferred to any other business carried on by the assessee, the price charged for such transfer should correspond to the market

M/S. D.J. MALPANI vs. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NASHIK

C.A. No.-005282-005282 - 2005Supreme Court09 Apr 2019

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 11ASection 173QSection 4

price was paid by the customers as ‘consideration’ for these goods i.e. transfer of property of the goods to the customers

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED

C.A. No.-005409-005409 - 2019Supreme Court25 Jul 2019

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 260ASection 92C

Transfer Pricing Officer8 passed an order under Section 92CA (3) determining the Arm’s Length Price of royalty at 3 per cent

M/S.SONY INDIA LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

C.A. No.-004964-004964 - 2000Supreme Court05 May 2004
For Respondent: Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi
Section 11Section 4

price once the goods are cleared in packed condition as per requirement of Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976. It was admitted that it was only stock transfer

COMMNR.,INCOME TAX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. K. RAVINDRANATHAN NAIR

C.A. No.-005173-005173 - 2007Supreme Court13 Nov 2007
For Respondent: K. Ravindranathan Nair
Section 28Section 80H

price or an item incidental to the transfer of the goods dealt with by the assessee. According to High Court

VODAFONE IDEA LTD(EARLIER KNOWN AS VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 26 (2)

C.A. No.-002377-002377 - 2020Supreme Court29 Apr 2020

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 143(2)Section 244ASection 92

Transfer Pricing Adjustment, Capitalization of Licence Fees, 3G Spectrum Fees, Asset Restoration Cost Obligation including the effect of amalgamation of group

M/S.MUTHOOT LEASING AND FINANCE LTD. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-010201-010202 - 2010Supreme Court03 Jan 2023

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 2Section 3Section 4Section 46Section 51

price for the transfer of the vehicle since the entire amount was paid as hire. This contention was not accepted

M/S. ASSOCIATED CEMENT COMPANIES LTD. vs. COMNR. OF CUSTOMS

Appeals are dismissed but in

C.A. No.-000821-000821 - 2000Supreme Court25 Jan 2001
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

price of developing. Contract for architectural services was stated to be like a contract by a solicitor to give a legal opinion or for a doctor to give a medical diagnosis since the essence of the contract is the experts skill. The learned counsel contended that the transaction between the appellants and their respective foreign collaborators was one for transfer

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX 4 BENGALURU 2 vs. M/S JUPITER CAPITAL PRIVATE LIMITED

SLP(C) No.-000063-000063 - 2025Supreme Court02 Jan 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA

Section 2(47)

transfer. The company paid the price for the redemption of the shares out of its fund to the assessee and the transaction

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX vs. M/S SUZLON ENERGY LTD

Appeals stand disposed of in terms of

C.A. No.-011400-011401 - 2018Supreme Court10 Apr 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Section 65Section 65(105)(zzzzd)Section 73Section 75Section 76Section 85

transfer of goods for a price cannot be subject to service tax. 4.7 It is submitted that it is true

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NAGPUR-I vs. M/S. INDORAMA SYNTHETICS (I) LTD

C.A. No.-001834-001834 - 2006Supreme Court21 Aug 2015
Section 4

price being paid for the goods, i.e. transfer of advance import licence in favour of the seller by the buyer

VATSALA SHENOY vs. JT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-001234-001234 - 2012Supreme Court18 Oct 2016
Section 260Section 583(4)(a)

transferred as a going concern for slump sale price, in the absence of evidence on record as to how the slump

COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX vs. M/S ELEGANT DEVELOPERS

C.A. No.-011744-011745 - 2025Supreme Court10 Nov 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

Section 35LSection 65(105)(v)Section 65(88)Section 69Section 70Section 73(1)Section 75Section 76Section 77Section 78

price settled in the MoUs. For this purpose, the respondent would be required to negotiate with the original landowners and facilitate the transfer

M/S. MODIPON FIBRE COMPANY vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUT

C.A. No.-008529-008531 - 2001Supreme Court25 Oct 2007
For Respondent: Commissioner of Central Excise,Meerut
Section 35LSection 4

price declaration under Rule 173-C in regard to the goods transferred to its depot in Surat for sale therefrom

THE BANK OF RAJASTHAN LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeals are dismissed

C.A. No.-003291-003294 - 2009Supreme Court16 Oct 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA

Section 18Section 19Section 20Section 21

price or face value. In many cases, Banks hold the same as investments.  Whether the Bank has held   HMT   security   as   investment   or   stock­in­trade   will depend on the facts of each case.  HTM Securities can be said to be held as an investment (i) if the securities are actually held till maturity and are not transferred