BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

191 results for “transfer pricing”

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,536Delhi2,411Chennai558Hyderabad503Bangalore456Ahmedabad348Kolkata271Jaipur256Chandigarh198Pune198SC191Indore146Cochin134Rajkot111Surat105Visakhapatnam79Nagpur67Lucknow50Raipur48Cuttack39Amritsar36Jodhpur30Guwahati28Agra26Dehradun25A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN17Jabalpur11Patna10Panaji7Varanasi7Ranchi6Allahabad5DIPAK MISRA V. GOPALA GOWDA1S.B. SINHA MARKANDEY KATJU1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1ANIL R. DAVE DIPAK MISRA1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Addition to Income26Section 11A21Penalty18Deduction16Section 415Exemption15Section 1113Section 109Depreciation9Section 2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4 MUMBAI vs. M/S S.G. ASIA HOLDINGS (INDIA) PVT. LTD

The Appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent

C.A. No.-006144-006144 - 2019Supreme Court13 Aug 2019

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 143(3)Section 92

PRICE UNDER SECTION 92 – GUIDELINES TO TRANSFER PRICING OFFICERS AND ASSESSING OFFICERS TO OPERATIONALISE TRANSFER PRICING PROVISIONS AND TO HAVE

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHELF DRILLING RON TAPPMEYER LIMITED

The appeals are allowed

C.A. No.-010586-010589 - 2025Supreme Court08 Aug 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

Section 144C

Showing 1–20 of 191 · Page 1 of 10

...
8
Section 80H8
Section 37
Section 153
Section 153(1)
Section 44B

Transfer Pricing Officer, within two months from the end of the month in which such order of the Transfer Pricing

ASSTT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX I NEW DELHI vs. M/S E FUNDS IT SOLUTION INC

C.A. No.-006082-006082 - 2015Supreme Court24 Oct 2017

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

pricing adjudication by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO, for short) and the Assessing Officer (AO, for short) in the returns

SAP LABS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER CIRCLE 6 (1) (1) BANGALORE

Appeals are allowed

C.A. No.-008463-008463 - 2022Supreme Court19 Apr 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

transfer pricing, the arm’s length price is to be determined taking into consideration the guidelines stipulated under the aforesaid

COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS vs. M/S. FERODO INDIA PVT. LTD

C.A. No.-008426-008426 - 2002Supreme Court21 Feb 2008
For Respondent: M/s Ferodo India Pvt. Ltd
Section 14

price method and cost plus method under the transfer pricing in the Income-tax Act, 1961. Role of Interpretative Notes

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S JINDAL STEEL THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

Appeals are hereby dismissed

C.A. No.-013771-013771 - 2015Supreme Court06 Dec 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

Section 260ASection 80

transferred to any other business carried on by the assessee, the price charged for such transfer should correspond to the market

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADHYA PRADESH vs. DEWAS CINE CORPORATION

- 0Supreme Court08 Nov 1967
For Respondent: DEWAS CINE CORPORATION

transfer of property for a price. and adjustment of the rights of the partners in a dissolved firm is not a transfer

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KERALA, ERNAKULAM vs. TRAVANCORE SUGAR & CHEMICALS LTD

- 0Supreme Court27 Oct 1972
For Respondent: TRAVANCORE SUGAR & CHEMICALS LTD
Section 10Section 10(1)Section 10(2)Section 10(2)(xv)Section 2

transfer of assets notwithstanding the fact that the Company paid a price fixed for the transfer of assets. Under the contract

M/S. D.J. MALPANI vs. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NASHIK

C.A. No.-005282-005282 - 2005Supreme Court09 Apr 2019

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 11ASection 173QSection 4

price was paid by the customers as ‘consideration’ for these goods i.e. transfer of property of the goods to the customers

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED

C.A. No.-005409-005409 - 2019Supreme Court25 Jul 2019

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 260ASection 92C

Transfer Pricing Officer8 passed an order under Section 92CA (3) determining the Arm’s Length Price of royalty at 3 per cent

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS vs. M/S. MADURAI MILLS CO. LIMITED

- 0Supreme Court09 Mar 1973
For Respondent: M/S. MADURAI MILLS CO. LIMITED
Section 12B

price but only a distribution of the assets of the companies which had gone into voluntary liquidation. Such a transaction does not amount to sale, exchange, relinquishment or transfer

NEW ERA AGENCIES (PVT.) LTD., BOMBAY vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY CITY 1,BOMBAY

- 0Supreme Court28 Nov 1967
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY CITY 1,BOMBAY

price was paid for the controlling interest which was being transferred along with the shares. HELD : The appeal must be dismissed

RAGHUNATH PRASAD PODDAR ETC. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALCUTTA

In the result we allow these appeals, vacate the answers

- 0Supreme Court25 Apr 1973
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALCUTTA
Section 24(1)

price of the goods mentioned therein and transferred those P.D.Os to his buyers after receiving the price fixed 93 for the sale

M/S.SONY INDIA LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

C.A. No.-004964-004964 - 2000Supreme Court05 May 2004
For Respondent: Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi
Section 11Section 4

price once the goods are cleared in packed condition as per requirement of Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976. It was admitted that it was only stock transfer

COMMNR.,INCOME TAX, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM vs. K. RAVINDRANATHAN NAIR

C.A. No.-005173-005173 - 2007Supreme Court13 Nov 2007
For Respondent: K. Ravindranathan Nair
Section 28Section 80H

price or an item incidental to the transfer of the goods dealt with by the assessee. According to High Court

DAVENPORT & CO. PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, WEST BENGAL

- 0Supreme Court31 Jul 1975
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, WEST BENGAL
Section 2(2)Section 24Section 24(1)Section 30

price of the goods covered by the delivery orders and transferred those P.D.Os. to buyers after receiving the price fixed

VODAFONE IDEA LTD(EARLIER KNOWN AS VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 26 (2)

C.A. No.-002377-002377 - 2020Supreme Court29 Apr 2020

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 143(2)Section 244ASection 92

Transfer Pricing Adjustment, Capitalization of Licence Fees, 3G Spectrum Fees, Asset Restoration Cost Obligation including the effect of amalgamation of group

M/S.MUTHOOT LEASING AND FINANCE LTD. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-010201-010202 - 2010Supreme Court03 Jan 2023

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 2Section 3Section 4Section 46Section 51

price for the transfer of the vehicle since the entire amount was paid as hire. This contention was not accepted

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,HYDERABAD-DECCAN vs. MESSRS. VAZIR SULTAN & SONS

The appeal is dismissed with costs throughout

- 0Supreme Court20 Mar 1959
For Respondent: MESSRS. VAZIR SULTAN & SONS

transfer for a price from one party to another of something that formed part of the enduring asset of one of them

M/S. ASSOCIATED CEMENT COMPANIES LTD. vs. COMNR. OF CUSTOMS

Appeals are dismissed but in

C.A. No.-000821-000821 - 2000Supreme Court25 Jan 2001
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

price of developing. Contract for architectural services was stated to be like a contract by a solicitor to give a legal opinion or for a doctor to give a medical diagnosis since the essence of the contract is the experts skill. The learned counsel contended that the transaction between the appellants and their respective foreign collaborators was one for transfer