BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 20clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,306Mumbai2,214Bangalore708Chennai650Kolkata470Ahmedabad423Jaipur410Hyderabad367Chandigarh212Pune201Raipur173Surat173Rajkot167Indore127Amritsar110Lucknow71Nagpur70Visakhapatnam59Patna58Guwahati56Cuttack49Jodhpur43Agra40Allahabad35Cochin32Telangana31Karnataka29Dehradun21Panaji7SC5Orissa4Ranchi4Kerala3Jabalpur3Varanasi3Gauhati2Himachal Pradesh2Calcutta1Uttarakhand1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 143(2)3Addition to Income3Section 115Q2Deduction2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL 3 vs. ABHISAR BUILDWELL P. LTD

C.A. No.-006580-006580 - 2021Supreme Court24 Apr 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Section 153ASection 2(45)Section 4Section 5

u/s 153A(1) of the Act. (viii) It is submitted that the expression “assessment” or “reassessment” appearing in the second proviso and the expressions “assess or reassess the total income” appearing in Section 153A (1)(b) have been employed carefully by the Parliament to convey clear and distinct intentions. It is submitted that the expression “assessment” or “reassessment” appearing

NEW DELHI TELEVISION LTD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-001008-001008 - 2020Supreme Court03 Apr 2020

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO

Bench:
Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(2)Section 148

reassessments were not satisfied. The re­assessments were made with reference to clause (b) of Section 147 of the Act, and apparently the Income Tax Officer proceeded on the basis that in consequence of information in his   possession   he   had   reason   to   believe   that   income chargeable   to   tax   had   escaped   assessment   for   the   two assessment years. From the material before

GENPACT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-008945-008945 - 2019Supreme Court22 Nov 2019

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 115QSection 143(2)Section 77A

u/s 46A in the hands of shareholders. However, taking the benefit of Article 13 of India-Mauritius DTAA, which provides for capital gain arising on transfer of shares of Mauritius resident taxable in that country and under Mauritius tax laws capital gain is totally exempt, entire transaction used to escape the tax net. Thus to plug this loop hole

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,SIMLA vs. M/S GREEN WORLD CORPORATION

Appeals are disposed of with the aforementioned directions

C.A. No.-003312-003312 - 2009Supreme Court06 May 2009
Section 133Section 133ASection 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 80I

20 workers throughout or through the substantial part of the year, and that the declared profits were reasonably high and exorbitant and non genuine also.” On the aforementioned finding, it was held: 27 “16.3 Under the circumstances, I am left with no alternative but to decide the proceedings on the basis of material on record. In the assessment year under

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) CIRCLE 1(2) vs. M/S M.R. SHAH LOGISTICS PVT. LTD

Appeal is allowed in these terms, without order on costs

C.A. No.-002453-002453 - 2022Supreme Court28 Mar 2022

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(1)Section 147

20,00,000/- 6. The reasons supplied by the AO further noted that he had completed the assessment in the case of Pradeep Birewar group and that a search took place in respect of that group along with various individuals who had obtained accommodation entries of long term capital gains (LTCG) in the shares of Ganesh Spinners Ltd. from Shirish