BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 548clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai158Delhi127Bangalore38Chennai36Ahmedabad34Surat26Jaipur21Indore20Chandigarh17Pune13Kolkata13Raipur12Nagpur8Hyderabad6SC3Jodhpur2Amritsar2Rajkot2Visakhapatnam1Cochin1Cuttack1Dehradun1Guwahati1Karnataka1Telangana1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 807Section 323Reassessment2

M/S. MANGALAM PUBLICATIONS, KOTTAYAM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM

C.A. No.-008580-008582 - 2011Supreme Court23 Jan 2024

Bench: This Court & On Leave Being Granted, Civil Appeals Have Been Registered. 3.

Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 260A

Section 147 of the Act. However, on receipt of representations from the companies against omission of the words “reason to believe”, Parliament reintroduced the said expression and deleted the word “opinion” on the ground that it would vest arbitrary powers in the assessing officer. 36. Elaborating further on the expression “change of opinion”, this Court in Techspan India Private Limited

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS vs. M/S CANON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

R.P.(C) No.-000400 - 2021Supreme Court07 Nov 2024

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA

Bench:

548 OF 2022 W.P.(C) No. 575 OF 2022 W.P.(C) No. 566 OF 2022 W.P.(C) No. 568 OF

PLASTIBLENDS INDIA LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR vs. ADDL.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE 8(2) MUMBAI

C.A. No.-000238-000238 - 2012Supreme Court09 Oct 2017

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Section 143(1)(a)Section 32Section 80

548 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 539 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 550 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 549 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 551 OF 2012 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 12755 OF 2017 A N D CIVIL APPEAL NO. 12980 OF 2017 J U D G M E N T A.K. SIKRI, J. The singular issue which needs