BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “reassessment”+ Section 234Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi347Mumbai307Bangalore184Jaipur110Hyderabad80Ahmedabad78Pune38Chennai36Kolkata26Agra24Cochin23Rajkot20Indore20Visakhapatnam19Dehradun15Nagpur15Ranchi15Lucknow13Chandigarh12Amritsar11Allahabad11Jodhpur10Patna9Guwahati9Karnataka4Raipur4SC4Surat4K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Panaji1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 139(1)3Section 2762Section 1542Section 234B2Section 1432Section 1442Section 1392Section 1422

MANSAROVAR COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI

C.A. No.-005769-005769 - 2022Supreme Court10 Apr 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Section 26Section 6(3)

234A is mandatory and there is no discretion with the AO and therefore there is no question of non-compliance of principles of natural justice. It is submitted that so far as the penalty leviable under section 271 of the Act is CA 5769/2022 Etc. Page 32 of 67 concerned, the same is discretionary, however the interest is not discretionary

BRIJ LAL vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

C.A. No.-000516-000527 - 2004Supreme Court21 Oct 2010
Section 139Section 142Section 143
Section 144
Section 148
Section 154
Section 234B
Section 245D(1)
Section 245D(4)
Section 5

234A. (1) Where the return of income for any assessment year under sub-section (1) or sub-section (4) of section 139, or in response to a notice under sub-section (1) of section 142, is furnished after the due date, or is not furnished, the assessee shall be liable to pay simple interest at the rate

SASI ENTERPRISES vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Crl.A. No.-000061-000061 - 2007Supreme Court30 Jan 2014

Bench: The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Egmore), Chennai, For The Willful & Deliberate Failure To File Returns For The Assessment Years 1991-92, 1992-93 & Hence Committing Offences Punishable Under Section 276 Cc Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (For Short “The Act”). Complaints Were Filed On 21.8.1997 After Getting The Sanction From The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Ii, Chennai Under Section 279(1) Of The Income Tax Act. Appellants Filed Two Discharge Petitions Under Section 245(2) Cr.P.C., Which Were Dismissed By The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vide Order Dated 14.6.2006. Appellants Preferred Crl. R.C. Nos.781 To 786 Of 2006 Before The High Court Of Madras Which Were Dismissed By The High Court Vide Its Common Order Dated 2.12.2006, Which Are The Subject Matters Of These Appeals.

Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 245(2)Section 276Section 279(1)

234A of the Act was introduced. But, legislature has never waived or relaxed its prosecuting provisions under Section 276CC of the Act for the infraction or non-furnishing of return of income. 18. Section 139 of the Act, as it stood at the relevant time, reads as under: “139. (1) Every person, if his total income or the total income

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX vs. HINDUSTAN BULK CARRIERS

The appeals are disposed of accordingly

C.A. No.-007966-007967 - 1996Supreme Court17 Dec 2000
For Respondent: M/s Hindustan bulk Carriers
Section 245

reassessment for any years and at any stage in original, appellate or revisional proceeding. The definition of ’case’ excludes appeals or revisions which have not been formally admitted by the concerned authorities. This definition clause (b) of Section 245 A indicates that the Settlement Commission can take up for settlement a ’case’ as defined which is pending at any stage