BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment”+ Section 220(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai194Delhi164Chennai125Bangalore72Jaipur67Chandigarh59Ahmedabad59Hyderabad58Raipur41Kolkata39Guwahati27Pune24Patna21Rajkot16Cuttack14Cochin14Indore12Lucknow8Visakhapatnam6SC6Surat6Amritsar5Jodhpur4Ranchi2Allahabad2Nagpur2Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)10Section 143(1)7Section 1447Section 220(2)7Section 1485Section 245D(4)5Section 1474Section 245D4Reassessment2Penalty

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS vs. M/S CANON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

R.P.(C) No.-000400 - 2021Supreme Court07 Nov 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA

Section 6 is the only Section which provides for entrustment of functions of Customs officer on other officers of the Central or the State Government or local authority, it reads as follows:- “6. Entrustment of functions of Board and customs officers on certain other officers. - The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, entrust either conditionally or unconditionally

COMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI vs. M/S DAMANI BROTHERS

The appeal is allowed to the extent indicated above

C.A. No.-007248-007248 - 1999Supreme Court17 Dec 2002
For Respondent: M/s Damani Brothers
Section 220Section 220(2)
2
Section 234
Section 245
Section 245A
Section 245C
Section 245D
Section 245D(1)
Section 245D(4)

220(2) of the Act. In response, learned counsel for the assessee submitted that an artificial distinction is sought to be made between the date of filing of petition under Section 245C and the date of decision to proceed with the petition under Section 245D. With reference to definition of the expression "case" as appearing under Section 245A

MODI INDUSTRIES LIMITED, MODINAGAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, DELHI

The appeals are allowed in the above

C.A. No.-000928-000928 - 1980Supreme Court15 Sept 1995
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI AND ANR. ETC. ETC
Section 143Section 144Section 18Section 18ASection 2Section 207Section 208Section 209Section 211Section 214

2) of Section 143. The assessment under Section 143 or 144 had to be completed within the time limit prescribed by sub- section (1) of Section 153. After completion of the assessment, the Income Tax Officer had to issue a notice of demand, if any sum was payable in consequence of the assessment order or notify to the assessee

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. RAJESH JHAVERI STOCK BROKERS PVT.LTD

The appeal is allowed without

C.A. No.-002830-002830 - 2007Supreme Court23 May 2007
For Respondent: Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd
Section 139Section 142Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(2)

reassessment or recomputation under section 147, the Assessing Officer shall serve on the assessee a notice containing all or any of the requirements which may be included in a notice under sub- section (2) of section 139; and the provisions of this Act shall, so far as may be, apply accordingly as if the notice were a notice issued under

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX vs. HINDUSTAN BULK CARRIERS

The appeals are allowed to the extent indicated above

C.A. No.-007966-007967 - 1996Supreme Court17 Dec 2002
For Respondent: M/s. Hindustan Bulk Carriers
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 2(40)Section 234BSection 245C

reassessment, tax shall be calculated on the aggregate of the total income as assessed in the earlier proceeding for assessment under section 143 or section 144 or section 147 and the income disclosed in the application as if such aggregate were the total income. (1C) The additional amount of income-tax payable in respect of the income disclosed

MAHARAJ KUMAR KAMAL SINGH vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BIHAR & ORISSA

In the result we hold that the Patna High Court was right in coming

- 0Supreme Court01 Oct 1958
For Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BIHAR & ORISSA

section can be invoked. In the Calcutta High Court, conflicting views have been expressed on this point. In Maharaja Bikram Kishore of Tripura v. Province. of Assam (1), Harries C. J. and Mukherjea J. had to deal with the construction of s. 30 of the Assam Agricultural Income-tax Act (Assam IX of 1939) which corresponds