Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 90clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

DILIP N. SHROFF vs. JOINT COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI &ANR

The appeal is allowed

C.A. No.-002746-002746 - 2007Supreme Court18 May 2007

For Respondent: Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai & Anr

U/s 271(1)(c) immediately as desired by the assessee, since I am leaving the country for good and intend to prefer an appeal against the order of Penalty if passed." 11. The First Respondent, however, in his order dated 23.08.2000 purported to be in exercise of its power under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, held : "\005The assessee

K. KRISHNAMURTHY vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeal is disposed of with

C.A. No.-002411-002411 - 2025Supreme Court13 Feb 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA

Section 132Section 139(1)

DILIP N. SHROFF vs. JOINT COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI &ANR

K. KRISHNAMURTHY vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

DILIP N. SHROFF vs. JOINT COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI &ANR

K. KRISHNAMURTHY vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) 2 vs. M/S MAHAGUN REALTORS (P) LTD