BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Section 397clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi386Karnataka357Mumbai197Bangalore138Hyderabad95Jaipur93Chennai81Kolkata41Chandigarh32Ahmedabad30Telangana30Indore29Raipur24Cochin16Calcutta16Agra14Surat11Pune10Cuttack10Dehradun8Lucknow7Guwahati7Nagpur6Rajkot6Rajasthan5Visakhapatnam4SC3Amritsar3Orissa2Jodhpur2Patna1Andhra Pradesh1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 80P(4)5Section 80P(2)(a)3Section 143(2)3Section 80P2Section 922

THE MAVILAYI SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CALICUT

C.A. No.-007343-007350 - 2019Supreme Court12 Jan 2021

Bench: Us, The Assessing Officer Denied Their Claims For Deduction, Relying Upon Section 80P(4) Of The It Act, Holding That As Per The Audited Receipt & 2

Section 147Section 19Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

397 ITR 1] the law laid down by the Division Bench in Perinthalmanna [363 ITR 268] has to be affirmed and we do. 36. In view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Ace Multi Axes Systems' case (supra), since each assessment year is a separate unit, the intention of the legislature is in no manner defeated

AKBAR BADRUDDIN JIWANI vs. THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

C.A. No.-003655-003655 - 1989
Supreme Court
14 Feb 1990
For Respondent: COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, BOMBAY

houses, buildings, or works which would otherwise have been unnecessarily enumerated." It has been secondly submitted on behalf of the appel- lant that the general principle of interpretation of tariff entries occurring in a tax statute is that of commercial nomenclature or understanding in the trade. It is also a settled legal position that the said doctrine of commercial nomenclature

VODAFONE IDEA LTD(EARLIER KNOWN AS VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 26 (2)

C.A. No.-002377-002377 - 2020Supreme Court29 Apr 2020

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 143(2)Section 244ASection 92

397 and subsequently, the income determined by the Assessing Officer was Rs.546,64,25,250/-. … … … 21. Counsel for the Revenue contended that for the relevant period under consideration, the Assessing Officer has already issued notice under sub-section (2) of Section 143 within time. As per the then prevailing provision, it was thereafter not necessary CIVIL APPEAL