BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “house property”+ Section 144Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai229Delhi193Bangalore50Kolkata20Chennai18Ahmedabad17Hyderabad17Jaipur13Indore8Pune5Chandigarh5Surat4Cochin3SC2Visakhapatnam1Jodhpur1Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 144C6Section 143(2)3Section 1532Section 153(1)2Section 922

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SHELF DRILLING RON TAPPMEYER LIMITED

The appeals are allowed

C.A. No.-010586-010589 - 2025Supreme Court08 Aug 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

Section 144CSection 153Section 153(1)Section 44B

section in case of a conflict with what is contained in the non obstante clause as stated above. 83. Further, a non obstante clause has to be distinguished from the expression “subject to” where the latter would convey the idea of a provision yielding place to another provision or other provisions to which it is made subject to. Also

VODAFONE IDEA LTD(EARLIER KNOWN AS VODAFONE MOBILE SERVICES LIMITED vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 26 (2)

C.A. No.-002377-002377 - 2020Supreme Court
29 Apr 2020

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 143(2)Section 244ASection 92

144C Final Assess -ment Order u/s. 143(3) Order u/s.143 (1D) 2014-15 30.9.2014 (Refund: Rs.1532 Cr Approx.) 31.8.2015 31.3.2016 22.2.2017 27.12.2018 20.9.2019 31.10.2019 (Refund: Rs.733Cr. Approx.) 23.7.2017 2015-16 1.11.2015 (Refund: Rs.135 5 Cr Approx.) 16.3.2016 25.11.2016 31.12.2018 20.9.2019 31.10.2019 (Demand: Rs.582 Cr. Approx.) 23.7.2018 2016-17 30.11.2016 (Refund: Rs.1128 Cr. Approx.) 3.7.2017 23.7.2018 2017-18 25.11.2017 (Refund: Rs.745