RAJ PAL SINGH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX HARYANA
In the result, this appeal fails and is, therefore, dismissed
C.A. No.-002416-002416 - 2010Supreme Court25 Aug 2020
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI
Section 256(1)Section 4Section 45Section 6
house property was
accepted and the addition made by AO in that regard was deleted but, on
examination of the award dated 29.09.1970, the CIT(A) found that the
assessee was paid Rs.62,550/- as compensation and Rs.9,532/- as
solatium and yet, capital gains on this account were not taxed by the
9 For short