BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 35Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi29Mumbai17Ahmedabad11Pune10Bangalore7Jaipur6SC3Chandigarh2Kolkata2Cuttack2Punjab & Haryana2Jabalpur1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 35B11Deduction2

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, KERALA vs. M/S. TARA AGENCIES

Appeal is allowed and the

C.A. No.-003568-003568 - 2001Supreme Court09 Jul 2007
For Respondent: M/s Tara Agencies
Section 35B

Section 35B (1A) was introduced with effect from 01.04.1978 and the respondent assessee claimed entitlement to weighted deduction being a small scale exporter. The Income Tax Officer disallowed

ARAVINDA PARAMILA WORKS vs. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX

In the result, we uphold the view taken by the

C.A. No.-011366-011366 - 1995Supreme Court31 Mar 1999
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 35B
Section 35B(1)(b)

Section 35B(1)(b)(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The High Courts have taken divergent views. We are concerned with the Assessment Year 1981-82. The assessee manufactured agarbathis. It had exported agarbathis during the year under consideration. It had paid commission to agents outside India who had procured orders. It claimed weighted deduction under the afore-mentioned

M/S MERIDIAN INDUSTRIES LTD. vs. COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE

C.A. No.-004112-004112 - 2007Supreme Court27 Oct 2015
Section 35B

Section 35B of the Act. The Commissioner of Central Excise preferred the appeal as directed by the Central Board of Excise & Customs against his own Order-in-Original No.32/2002-Commr. dated 21.06.2002 before the Tribunal. 5. The Tribunal allowed the appeal preferred by the Commissioner of Central Excise vide its decision dated 17.07.2007. Perusal of the decision indicates following thought process