BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Unexplained Investmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai475Delhi320Chennai133Bangalore120Jaipur114Kolkata77Ahmedabad72Hyderabad53Chandigarh34Pune33Indore28Raipur27Cochin24Lucknow18Nagpur17Surat17Visakhapatnam14Rajkot12Guwahati12Ranchi8Varanasi7Amritsar7Jodhpur6Agra6Telangana5Cuttack5Allahabad5SC3Karnataka3Dehradun2Patna2Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 260A2Section 1472Reassessment2

M/S D. N. SINGH THROUGH PARTNER DUDHESHWAR NATH SINGH vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

C.A. No.-003738-003739 - 2023Supreme Court16 May 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

Section 260A

unexplained money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable articles. Section 69A was inserted by Amending Act 5 of 1964 and it came into effect w.e.f. 01.04.1964. Both Sections require that the subject matter of the provisions, viz., investments in the case of Section 69 and money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable articles in the case of Section 69A are not recorded

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) CIRCLE 1(2) vs. M/S M.R. SHAH LOGISTICS PVT. LTD

Appeal is allowed in these terms, without order on costs

C.A. No.-002453-002453 - 2022Supreme Court28 Mar 2022

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 132
Section 132(4)
Section 143(1)
Section 147

unexplained. Besides, in the case of Trinetra Commerce & Trade(P) Ltd in [2016]75 taxmann.com 70(Calcutta) it was seen that assessee- company had received share capital from persons/entities whose identity, creditworthiness etc were not established. Addition u/s 68 was made been made in hands of assessee-company. Subsequent, one person K disclosed such amount before Settlement Commission

M/S. MANGALAM PUBLICATIONS, KOTTAYAM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTTAYAM

C.A. No.-008580-008582 - 2011Supreme Court23 Jan 2024

Bench: This Court & On Leave Being Granted, Civil Appeals Have Been Registered. 3.

Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 260A

unexplained profits and gains of the partners. It was thereafter that reassessment proceedings were initiated. First appellate authority i.e. CIT(A) not only affirmed the reassessment orders of the assessing officer but also enhanced the quantum of escaped income which was restored by the High Court after setting aside the reversal order of the Tribunal. 22.5. Learned counsel