BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “depreciation”+ Section 211(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai372Delhi352Bangalore216Chennai88Ahmedabad82Kolkata79Raipur42Hyderabad35Cochin32Jaipur21Indore20Pune19Lucknow13Chandigarh13Visakhapatnam13Surat12Karnataka11Ranchi9SC8Kerala6Dehradun5Cuttack4Agra3Jodhpur3Panaji2Patna2Rajkot2Calcutta2Nagpur1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Allahabad1Rajasthan1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 805Section 36(1)(vii)4Section 80J4Section 115J4Section 32A3Section 158B3Deduction3Section 37(1)2Section 80V2Depreciation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. AHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

C.A. No.-021762-021762 - 2017Supreme Court19 Oct 2022

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Section 12AA(1) of the IT Act, on 18.05.1979 and is engaged in the activity of promotion of the export of all kind of ready-made garments, knitwear, and garments made of leather, jute and hemp. It does not per se engage in any activity for profit, and its mandate is to ensure that Indian apparel manufacturers, are given forums

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. A.R. ENTERPRISES

C.A. No.-002688-002688 - 2006Supreme Court14 Jan 2013
Section 132Section 158BSection 260A

depreciation under sub- section (2) of section 32; (b) of a firm, or its partners, the method of computation of undisclosed income and its allocation to the partners shall be in accordance with the method adopted for determining the as- 21 Page 22 JUDGMENT sessed income or returned income for each of the previous years falling within the block period

2

MALAYALA MANORAMA CO LTD. vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX, TRIVANDRUM

The appeals are allowed and the

C.A. No.-005420-005423 - 2002Supreme Court10 Apr 2008
For Respondent: Commissioner of Income Tax,Trivandrum
Section 115JSection 33Section 80Section 80V

depreciation at the rates prescribed by the Income-tax Rules, 1962. This has been the consistent practice of the assessee throughout. Section 211(2

M/S. SOUTHERN TECHNOLOGIES LTD. vs. JOINT COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, COIMBATORE

C.A. No.-001337-001337 - 2003Supreme Court11 Jan 2010
Section 145Section 2(24)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 37Section 37(1)

Section 211 of the Companies Act, 1956 like any other company. Schedule VI Part I of the Companies Act, 1956 specifically provides that Provision for doubtful debts should be reduced from the gross amount of debtors and advances. NBFCs were following the same practice of disclosure in their audited financial statements as done by the Company. Therefore, vide Para

THE INDIAN HOTELS COMPANY LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,CIRCLE 1, BOMBAY

In the result, Transferred Cases No

T.C.(C) No.-000020-000024 - 1989Supreme Court08 Aug 2000
For Respondent: THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, MUMBAI & OTHERS
Section 256(2)Section 32ASection 80Section 80JSection 80J(1)Section 80J(4)(iii)Section 80J(6)

depreciation or otherwise) in computing the income chargeable under the head Profits and gains of business or profession of any one previous year. (2) The ship or aircraft or machinery or plant referred to in sub-section (1) shall be the following, namely: (a) a new ship or new aircraft acquired after the 31st day of March

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VI vs. VIRTUAL SOFT SYSTEMS LTD

The appeal is hereby dismissed leaving parties to bear their own cost

C.A. No.-004358-004358 - 2018Supreme Court24 Apr 2018

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL

2) This batch of appeals has been filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 07.02.2012 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in ITA Nos. 216, 398, 403, 404 and 680 of 2011 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short ‘the Tribunal’) dated

COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS (GENERAL), N. DELHI vs. GUJARAT PERSTORP ELECTRONICS LTD

The appeals are allowed

C.A. No.-008568-008569 - 2001Supreme Court05 Aug 2005
For Respondent: M/s. Gujarat Perstorp Electronics Ltd
Section 28(1)

2) Bound picture books (other than children’s picture books of heading 49.03). (3) A collection of printed reproductions of works of art, drawings, etc. with a relative text (for example, a biography of the artist), put up with numbered pages and forming a whole suitable for binding. (4) A pictorial supplement accompanying and subsidiary to a bound volume containing

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, TRIVANDRUM vs. M/S TRANVANCORE TITANIUM PRODUCTS LTD

C.A. No.-003825-003825 - 1999Supreme Court07 Dec 2000
For Respondent: M/S. TRANVANCORE TITANIUM PRODUCTS LTD
Section 18Section 256(1)

section, be in the form set out in Pt. I of Sch. VI, or near thereto as circumstances admit or in such other form as may be approved by the Central Govt. either generally or in any particular case, while s. 211 (2) provides that every profit and loss account of a company shall give a true and fair view