BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “depreciation”+ Section 11Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai31Delhi21Kolkata11Bangalore11Lucknow8SC7Indore6Karnataka4Chennai4Cuttack3Pune3Visakhapatnam2Hyderabad1Chandigarh1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 8018Section 11A5Section 23Section 323Section 43Section 113Deduction3Depreciation3Penalty3Section 35L

PLASTIBLENDS INDIA LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR vs. ADDL.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE 8(2) MUMBAI

C.A. No.-000238-000238 - 2012Supreme Court09 Oct 2017

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Section 143(1)(a)Section 32Section 80

depreciation? The Full Bench went on to answer this question with the observations that it was no longer res integra as the Apex Court had reflected thereupon in the case of Liberty India and quoted the following passage from the said judgment in support of its aforesaid 16 remarks: “13. Before analyzing section 80-IB, as a prefatory note

M/S. O.K. PLAY (INDIA) LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI

C.A. No.-000275-000276 - 2001Supreme Court04 Feb 2005
For Respondent: Commissioner of Central Excise-II, New Delhi
2
Limitation/Time-bar2
Section 11ASection 2Section 35L

11A of the 1944 Act. By the aforestated orders the Commissioner (Adjudication) upheld the invocation of extended period of limitation under show-cause notice dated 4.11.1997. The Commissioner (Adjudication) also found from Form-IV register that the assessee has been buying the moulding powder at times from the market. By the impugned judgment, the Tribunal has upheld the orders

THE TATA IRON AND STEEL CO.LTD., BIHAR vs. THE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE,PATNA

The appeals are disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs

C.A. No.-005421-005421 - 1999Supreme Court02 Mar 2005
For Respondent: Collector of Central Excise, Patna
Section 11Section 35L

depreciation is admissible under the provisions of Section 10(2)(vi) and Section 10(2) (via) of the Act in respect of diesel oil engines fitted to the motor vehicles in replacement of the existing engines. It was held that the expression ‘installed’ did not necessarily means fix in position but was also used in the sense of inducted

COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, TAMIL NADU vs. M/S. SOUTHERN STRUCTURALS LTD

C.A. No.-000180-000180 - 2003Supreme Court06 Aug 2008
Section 11ASection 4

11A of the Act and ordered that the said amount paid subsequently be appropriated against this duty liability. The Commissioner also imposed the penalty of Rs.20 Lac under Rule 173Q and Rs.34,18,250/- under Section 11AC of the Act. 4. Aggrieved against the said order-in-original passed by the Commissioner, the respondent preferred an appeal before the C.A.No

M/S LIBERTY INDIA vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,KARNAL

C.A. No.-005891-005891 - 2009Supreme Court31 Aug 2009
Section 260ASection 80

11A) (such business being hereinafter referred to as the eligible business), there shall, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, be allowed, in computing the total income of the assessee, a deduction from such profits and gains of an amount equal to such percentage and for such number of assessment years as specified in this section

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,PUNE vs. HINDUSTAN NATIONAL GLASS & INDS. LTD

In the result, the appeal is allowed, the order passed

C.A. No.-001829-001829 - 2008Supreme Court14 Jan 2016
Section 11ASection 11A(1)

11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short Page 3 JUDGMENT 3 “the Act”) being the duty payable on the additional consideration received by the assessee from the customers in the form of notional interest accrued on advance payments and also imposed penalty for the same amount under Section 11AC of the Act. Apart from that, the adjudicating

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 11 (1) BANGALORE vs. M/S ACE MULTI AXES SYSTEMS LTD

Appeals are disposed of in the same terms

C.A. No.-020854-020854 - 2017Supreme Court05 Dec 2017

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

Section 263Section 33BSection 80

11A) and (11B) (such business being hereinafter referred to as the eligible business), there shall, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, be allowed, in computing the total income of the assessee, a deduction from such profits and gains of an amount equal to such percentage and for such number of assessment years as specified