BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “depreciation”+ Section 115J(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai141Delhi134Kolkata46Ahmedabad14Bangalore12Jaipur9Surat8SC7Chennai6Nagpur4Guwahati4Rajkot4Telangana3Karnataka2Indore1Hyderabad1Gauhati1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Cuttack1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 115J19Section 1157Depreciation5Section 115J(1)4Section 804Section 158B3Section 80V3Section 260A2Section 3552Deduction

MALAYALA MANORAMA CO LTD. vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX, TRIVANDRUM

The appeals are allowed and the

C.A. No.-005420-005423 - 2002Supreme Court10 Apr 2008
For Respondent: Commissioner of Income Tax,Trivandrum
Section 115JSection 33Section 80Section 80V

115J and since this is a legislation by incorporation, the said provision of the Companies Act, 1956 has to be applied as indicated by that provision in the Companies Act. It was also pointed out that in section 205 of the Companies Act, it has been provided that for the purposes of calculating depreciation under section 205(1

M/S KARNATAKA SMALL S.INDT.DEV.COR.LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,BANGALORE

C.A. No.-000823-000823 - 2000
2
Supreme Court
03 Dec 2002
For Respondent: Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore
Section 115Section 115JSection 115J(1)Section 256(1)Section 28Section 32Section 72Section 73Section 74Section 74A

depreciation which would have been allowed on such assets in the regular method of assessment in accordance with the provisions of Section 28 to 43 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without applying the provisions of Section 115J(1

M/S. DYNAMIC ORTHOPEDICS PVT. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN

C.A. No.-008419-008419 - 2003Supreme Court16 Feb 2010
Section 115JSection 205Section 349Section 350Section 355Section 80V

1) In computing for the purpose of section 348, the net profits of a company in any financial year-- [a] xxxx xxxx xxxx [b] the sums specified in sub-section (4) shall be deducted, and those specified in sub-section (5) shall not be deducted. xxxx xxxx xxxx [4] In making the computation aforesaid, the following sums shall be deducted

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S. A.R. ENTERPRISES

C.A. No.-002688-002688 - 2006Supreme Court14 Jan 2013
Section 132Section 158BSection 260A

depreciation under sub- section (2) of section 32; (b) of a firm, or its partners, the method of computation of undisclosed income and its allocation to the partners shall be in accordance with the method adopted for determining the as- 21 Page 22 JUDGMENT sessed income or returned income for each of the previous years falling within the block period

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL vs. DY.COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX & ANR.ETC.ETC

Appeals are allowed accordingly

C.A. No.-002039-002041 - 1996Supreme Court17 Jan 1996
For Respondent: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME-TAX (ASSTS) III, HYDERABAD
Section 115

1) proviso (b) of the Companies Act whether depreciation include loss? (3) If an assessee had not incurred losses in previous years but only had unabsorbed depreciation claim, the claim for deduction under section 115J

SREE AYYANAR SPINNING & WEAVING M.LTD. vs. COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX

Accordingly, the Civil Appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed with no order

C.A. No.-003246-003246 - 2008Supreme Court01 May 2008
For Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 254(2)

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3246 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 10576 of 2007) SREE AYYANAR SPINNING & WEAVING M.LTD. ...APPELLANT (S) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ...RESPONDENT(S) ORDER Leave granted. In this Civil Appeal filed by the assessee - appellant, we are required to deci de the scope of Section

COMMR.OF INCOME TAX-IV,DELHI vs. M/S HCL COMNET SYSTEMS & SERVICES LD

Accordingly the same is dismissed with no order as

C.A. No.-005800-005800 - 2008Supreme Court23 Sept 2008
Section 115JSection 210

1 of 1956), which is different from the previous year under the Act, the method and rates for calculation of depreciation shall correspond to the method and rates which have been adopted for calculating the depreciation for such financial year or part of such financial year falling within the relevant previous year. Explanation.-For the purposes of this section, "book